Evolution of Human

[FearGod]

Your beliefs (once again) are not supported by any evidence.

Did i talk about my belief, i was only showing how stupid is yours

BTW: the genus name is Capitalized and the species name is lower case. Thus is should be Home sapiens, unless you want to appear to be a dump.

1986: Molecular Biology of Homo Sapiens, Vol. LI

Organizer: James Watson

Molecular Biology of Homo Sapiens, Vol. LI

Are we discussing English here, how silly is your efforts as to try to win any point while failing to gain any point for our main topic.

Children need to be taught to speak, at least by example. Children who are not spoken to at all have severe communication problems.

Yes the child will grow as speechless and will stay speechless if not learned, So how the first adult humans spoke.

Birds are born with their basic songs encoded into their DNA, they do not need to learn them, though they can learn to modify them. It is an entirely different process and is not akin to human speech.

And ours isn't a DNA issue, so where ours came from , doesn't it due to mutations and natural selection or you have a different view.

There is not such thing as "animal language," at least in the sense that we use the work "language" to describe human speech.

Animals don't speak, i think your fellow atheists have to keep silent and to agree with you,but when i said in one thread that science found out that ants do speak their own language as mentioned in the scripture then atheists replied that all animals have their own languages and we have our own so what.:sarcastic

Good try, but still wrong. It's Homo sapiens ... see? Capitalize the initial letter of the Genus and everything else lower case. Got it now?

It is normal that you try to find any silly point to win while you are failing for the main topic, good luck

 

[Sapiens]

It is not a silly point, it is a friendly attempt to help you look less like a life sciences ignoramus.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

Yes the child will grow as speechless and will stay speechless if not learned, So how the first adult humans spoke.

That's like asking "Without computers, we wouldn't have the technology to build more sophisticated computers, so how did humans build the first computers?"

It's really quite simple. Language developed slowly over time. It wasn't overnight. Early humans found some means to express ideas and communicate, and these means were slowly popularized within their communities and picked up through osmosis in their young. Language started out primitive and then became more complex over time as human beings found different ways of expressing or communicating through action or sound. It took a very long time for these means of conveying information to become anything resembling a language as we understand them today - as it should, considering that languages are vastly more sophisticated and complicated.

And ours isn't a DNA issue, so where ours came from , doesn't it due to mutations and natural selection or you have a different view.

It is through evolution that we developed voice boxes that gave us the capacity to make a wider variety of noises that convey different ideas. Language, on the other hand, is something completely different. The ability to use or understand a language does not immediately translate into ability to form an entire language instantly. Again, these abilities were put to simple use at first, and got more complex and sophisticated as time went on.

Animals don't speak, i think your fellow atheists have to keep silent and to agree with you,but when i said in one thread that science found out that ants do speak their own language as mentioned in the scripture then atheists replied that all animals have their own languages and we have our own so what.

They were very obviously not using the word literally.

It is normal that you try to find any silly point to win while you are failing for the main topic, good luck

Since you cannot understand basic concepts like "language and farming take a long time to develop", you are in no position to patronize anyone in this thread.

 

[ScuzManiac]

Did i talk about my belief, i was only showing how stupid is yours

1986: Molecular Biology of Homo Sapiens, Vol. LI

Organizer: James Watson

Molecular Biology of Homo Sapiens, Vol. LI

Are we discussing English here, how silly is your efforts as to try to win any point while failing to gain any point for our main topic.






Yes the child will grow as speechless and will stay speechless if not learned, So how the first adult humans spoke.




And ours isn't a DNA issue, so where ours came from , doesn't it due to mutations and natural selection or you have a different view.



Animals don't speak, i think your fellow atheists have to keep silent and to agree with you,but when i said in one thread that science found out that ants do speak their own language as mentioned in the scripture then atheists replied that all animals have their own languages and we have our own so what.:sarcastic



It is normal that you try to find any silly point to win while you are failing for the main topic, good luck

First of all, why are you citing a 20+ year old book as a source?

Second of all, that's the title of a book and it's written correctly.

Your usage of the word wasn't. See the source below...

And feel free to ignore it because you're wrong like you did the last one I posted.

Homo sapiens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note: We're not trying to find silly points to win. We just want you to learn HOW to properly communicate before we debate with you.
You're speaking as if you came from a gene pool that never progressed since its inception a few hundred thousand years ago (no offense).

 

[Sapiens]

Because he's used to citing a not quite 2,000 year old book as his only source. Note that both books are wrong, but in this case I can assure you that Watson knew better. One of the attributes of the religionists is their inability to absorb and integrate new information. That's why they make the same old, repeatedly refuted arguments, never recognizing that a given line of argument failed decades ago.

 

[Parsimony]

190000 it takes human to start reading and writing
10000 it takes human to invent the IC.

Yes it make sense. :clap

Kind of got your years screwed up there. It was thousands of years after the invention of reading that humans invented the microchip. So it took way more than 10,000 years for humans to learn how to make the microchip.

 

[FearGod]

First of all, why are you citing a 20+ year old book as a source?

Second of all, that's the title of a book and it's written correctly.

Your usage of the word wasn't. See the source below...

And feel free to ignore it because you're wrong like you did the last one I posted.

Homo sapiens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note: We're not trying to find silly points to win. We just want you to learn HOW to properly communicate before we debate with you.
You're speaking as if you came from a gene pool that never progressed since its inception a few hundred thousand years ago (no offense).

WOW, i have to write small letters and capital letters properly in order to communicate.

Letter case has an effect in your ability to understand, i thought that homo erectus have been extincted.

It is OK if i have grammar errors since English isn't my native language but i wonder how you don't know that homo sapiens have lived since about 200000 years ago.

 

[FearGod]

Kind of got your years screwed up there. It was thousands of years after the invention of reading that humans invented the microchip. So it took way more than 10,000 years for humans to learn how to make the microchip.

Did i say something else ?

190000 years were passed without learning.

 

[Aman777]

Since God didn't author Genesis, I'm afraid it's you who is wrong -- not only about the authorship of Genesis, but also in error of standing in judgment of me and my thinking.

Dear sojourner, God says He did in Scripture but you seem to know better. I won't give the verses, since you would probably view them as myth, allegory, and fiction. Right? Are you a Unitarian? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[ScuzManiac]

WOW, i have to write small letters and capital letters properly in order to communicate.

Letter case has an effect in your ability to understand, i thought that homo erectus have been extincted.

It is OK if i have grammar errors since English isn't my native language but i wonder how you don't know that homo sapiens have lived since about 200000 years ago.

So, after arguing about your grammar over and over....

You start making excuses for WHY your grammar is off?

And you must not be able to read either...

Because I clearly stated that Homo sapiens have been around for about 200K years.

And I already know. A rough estimate is around 200,000 years....

See that?

 

[ScuzManiac]

Dear sojourner, God says He did in Scripture but you seem to know better. I won't give the verses, since you would probably view them as myth, allegory, and fiction. Right? Are you a Unitarian? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

Wow...

Now Aman777 is here.



So, when God wrote Genesis, he spoke in the third person point of view?

 

[Parsimony]

Did i say something else ?

190000 were passed without learning.

You said it took 190,000 years to learn how to read and that it took 10,000 years to learn how to make the microchip. Your statement implied that we figured out how to make microchips sooner than we learned how to read.

 

[ScuzManiac]

You said it took 190,000 years to learn how to read and that it took 10,000 years to learn how to make the microchip. Your statement implied that we figured out how to make microchips sooner than we learned how to read.

190,000 years passed and humans didn't learn a damn thing apparently.

"190000 were passed without learning."

 

[idav]

190,000 years passed and humans didn't learn a damn thing apparently.

"190000 were passed without learning."

I took millions of years for mammals to learn to type.

 

[Aman777]

Originally Posted by FearGod
While 190000 years to start reading.

Where do you get 19,000 years from though?

Hieroglyphics are pretty much the oldest known system in relation to reading...

And humans have been on this planet for AT LEAST 100,000 years.

Dear Scuz, Get your money back for your "education". Fear God didn't say 19,000. Don't you know the difference between 19,000 and 190,000? I ask this since you always seem to be really extreme when criticizing my posts, for the slightest error.

Also, Hieroglyphics is NOT the oldest system in writing. Cuniform is, and it came from Mesopotamia, just as the the OLDEST Human cities did. That's because the FIRST Human to step foot on this Earth was NOAH.

Your THIRD stike comes with believing the Folly of men, the False ToE, which has NO evidence to support it since it is nothing but a Satanic Falsehood. Humans arrived on this Earth some 10,000 years ago and HISTORY agrees. Below is the empirical evidence which YOU nor any other Evol has been able to refute. That's because it reveals that the ToE is the Biggest Falsehood ever told, in the History of Human civilization on this Planet of the descendants of Apes.

Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE

Please correct your errors and remember this post when you are tempted to criticize me for a much smaller error. Wasn't it .1 of 1 percent which you jumped on with both feet? Don't bother to apologize. This post was worth all your past rants, :slap: put together. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[ScuzManiac]

Originally Posted by FearGod
While 190000 years to start reading.



Dear Scuz, Get your money back for your "education". Fear God didn't say 19,000. Don't you know the difference between 19,000 and 190,000? I ask this since you always seem to be really extreme when criticizing my posts, for the slightest error.

Also, Hieroglyphics is NOT the oldest system in writing. Cuniform is, and it came from Mesopotamia, just as the the OLDEST Human cities did. That's because the FIRST Human to step foot on this Earth was NOAH.

Your THIRD stike comes with believing the Folly of men, the False ToE, which has NO evidence to support it since it is nothing but a Satanic Falsehood. Humans arrived on this Earth some 10,000 years ago and HISTORY agrees. Below is the empirical evidence which YOU nor any other Evol has been able to refute. That's because it reveals that the ToE is the Biggest Falsehood ever told, in the History of Human civilization on this Planet of the descendants of Apes.

Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE

Please correct your errors and remember this post when you are tempted to criticize me for a much smaller error. Wasn't it .1 of 1 percent which you jumped on with both feet? Don't bother to apologize. This post was worth all your past rants, :slap: put together. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

That would be cute and all if I hadn't already acknowledged my error TO him...

And moved on pages ago. Thanks for trying though.

I bolded some errors in your post though if you want to play that game.

There's a difference in a typo and poor grammar...

P.S. Why do you always use that SAME source? All you got?

P.S.S. Learn to read: I didn't say hieroglyphics were the oldest form of WRITING....

 

[FearGod]

So, after arguing about your grammar over and over....

You start making excuses for WHY your grammar is off?

And you must not be able to read either...

Because I clearly stated that Homo sapiens have been around for about 200K years.



See that?

See that

Where do you get 19,000 years from though?

Hieroglyphics are pretty much the oldest known system in relation to reading...

And humans have been on this planet for AT LEAST 100,000 years.

Talking about grammar,

You should say "where did you get" and "not where do you get"

Modern humans have been on this planet for 200,000 years and not 100,000 years.

"At least" should be in small letters and not in capital letters , sorry for being off topic here

 

[ScuzManiac]

See that




Talking about grammar,

You should say "where did you get" and "not where do you get"

Modern humans have been on this planet for 200,000 years and not 100,000 years.

"At least" should be in small letters and not in capital letters , sorry for being off topic here

LOL!

You're hilarious. Show me a source where it says that it cannot be "where do you get."

Also, I said AT LEAST (I emphasized it hoping you would understand but you didn't) 100,000 years.

If you look at my other post (when you asked me if I know how long exactly) you will find that I said around 200,000 years is the common belief.

Also, once again, "at least" was in all capitals for emphasis but it went right over your head.

I write for a living (I work from home and get paid very well for my work).

I have two published novels, 1 optioned screenplay, and 1 produced screenplay.

Please don't come on here and tell me how I need to form sentences.

Sorry for being off topic here.

P.S. "Talking about grammar" is an incomplete sentence. Don't play this game any longer, bud.

 

[FearGod]

LOL!

You're hilarious. Show me a source where it says that it cannot be "where do you get."

Also, I said AT LEAST (I emphasized it hoping you would understand but you didn't) 100,000 years.

If you look at my other post (when you asked me if I know how long exactly) you will find that I said around 200,000 years is the common belief.

Also, once again, "at least" was in all capitals for emphasis but it went right over your head.

I write for a living (I work from home and get paid very well for my work).

I have two published novels, 1 optioned screenplay, and 1 produced screenplay.

Please don't come on here and tell me how I need to form sentences.

Sorry for being off topic here.

P.S. "Talking about grammar" is an incomplete sentence. Don't play this game any longer, bud.

I wonder if English is your first language.

Reviews

 

[ScuzManiac]

I wonder if English is your first language.

Reviews

Nice source! It outlines the content of a workbook.

It says nothing about the way I constructed one of my previous sentences.

That makes me wonder if you are delusional.

Also, English IS my first language. What part about published/optioned do you not understand?

I've been "blessed" with the ability to work for a year and take a few years off based on my writing skills (or storytelling abilities).

Can you say the same and back it up? I can.

:yes: