Mohammad Nur Syamsu
Well-Known Member
Since we can measure anger and observe it is objective fact people have emotions. You fail to link the view on anger with stones or water, non-sequitur. I said good and evil are perspectives so are subjective. I already linked studies proving my point while you have linked nothing. Even what you linked does not even support your views since you do not read your own sources or you are incapable of understanding your sources. Come back with evidence if you are going to complain about sources supporting an opposing view to your own. Otherwise all you are provide is unsubstantiated statements which I can freely dismiss.
It's whatever, what I say about how subjectivity works is correct. Which means you are just providing evidence of rejection of subjectivity, by making emotions an issue of fact. And providing evidence that this rejection of subjectivity is very tenacious, very strong, by insisting on it, even after it has been explained again and again that it does not work.
It is very easy to see how an environment with such social horrors of people telling you as fact what your emotions are could be conducive to depression. It's absolutely evil! It is "hell in the highschool" indeed.
And we can see all the evolutionists supporting this idea, which is because evolution theory destroys all knowledge about how things are chosen.
The support of muslims and supposed creationists for subjectivity is also very weak. One has to really accept as plain scientific fact that freedom is real, while religionists rather tend to "believe" freedom is real, but don't accept it as certain fact also.
The support for the validity of subjectivity is minimal all round. We are just living on God's mercy, doing the absolute minimum in acknowdging each other's emotions, as well as each individual acknowledging their own emotions minimally.