Heh, it's funny that he would be offended to be called an ape, even as we call ourselves apes. My puny little mind, to answer jayhawke, was it? Can comprehend plenty. honestly, i just said that because i was getting annoyed that someone could take some basic logic, and with their god, manage to warp it so completely. Man, some of these religious people would argue that square were circles if they thought it somehow disproved their god, even though it actually has nothing to do with it.
Now, as it's been said before, evolution does not disprove a god. Of course, as an athiest, i figure that if we can explain everything naturally, why do we need a god to explain it? You know how they say that god making stuff is the easiest answer? How so? If we can scientifically prove how something came about, doesn't it just complicate things to add some random supernatural being into the mix? Of course, i think that is just my opinion, and many other athiests. I could be wrong, other athiests may not agree, but it makes sense.
I apologise for my snarky comments. Though, to eselam, the only heat i can't take is the heat made by your big head. Man, i can't stand it when people make assertions they can't even begin to back up. That is why I wont say there is no god, i wont make that statement, because i can't back it up. I see no real evidence for a god, and no real reason to believe there is one. But, i also see no evidence(because all gods have been made so they can not be disproven) that there isn't a god. Thus, agnostic athiest. My belief? No god. My actual knowledge? Dont know, can't disprove it.
Now, i'm not really up on evolution, i have the basic idea. But, isnt natural selection, a part of evolution? Just curious. I mean, i made a case where the changes weren't even noticeably physical, just trait based, and got told that that isn't evolution, because the fish doesn't look different. I'm pretty sure they are misunderstanding evolution, right? or am i? Someone who really knows evolution well, sort me out, will you?
.
