EVOLUTION, what a lie.

[LittleNipper]

Sigh . . . .

Evolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And how long did it take life on a dead planet to originate? After that, how long did it take that life to become you? That equals approximately how many changes a year to accomplish that feat? (Note my sense of humor) One must assume that math is a more exact science than biology, perhaps?

 

[LittleNipper]

YouTube - Foreigner-I Want to Know What Love Is

Is love marriage? Is love sex? Is sex marriage? Do two outlets form a complete circuit?

 

[doppelganger]

And how long did it take life on a dead planet to originate?

There are at least half a dozen category errors underlying your questions. And no, I'm not going to bother explaining them to you, so don't ask.

 

[doppelganger]

Is love marriage? Is love sex? Is sex marriage? Do two outlets form a complete circuit?

Ask Lou Gramm . . . no wait . . . he want you to show him . . . :flirt:

 

[LittleNipper]

There are at least half a dozen category errors underlying your questions. And no, I'm not going to bother explaining them to you, so don't ask.

Questions do not have category errors. Those without an explanation use such as an excuse not to be painted into an obvious corner of their own design.

 

[doppelganger]

Questions do not have category errors.

True. Lousy questions can be based on them though.

 

[LittleNipper]

True. Lousy questions can be based on them though.

No such thing as a lousy question, only lame excuses for bad choices.

 

[doppelganger]

No such thing as a lousy question, only lame excuses for bad choices.

Sounds like you need confession, LittleNipper. Rhetorical questions are frequently lousy . . . as were yours. Go forth and sin no more, my child.

 

[The Voice of Reason]

Go forth and sin no more, my child.

Don't let him tell you what to do, Little Nipper.

Most of us would settle for it if you would just "go forth".

 

[Autodidact]

What are you specifically referring to when you say evolution? Evolution of what exactly? You tell me that and I will not be confused.

I am referring to a theory, a specific theory in the scientific field of Biology, the Theory of Evolution. Are you familiar with it? Do you know what it explains and how?

 

[Autodidact]

I'm against science being placed in a secular box and called "being Constitutional."

You don't have any idea what you're talking about. Science takes no position on the existence of God. There is no science, Biological or otherwise, that asserts there is no God. There is no scientific theory that God does not exist. The existence of God is compatible with every scientific theory, including ToE. What the constitution requires is that we don't take religion and call it science. Do you have a problem with that?

 

[Autodidact]

Perhaps you could tell me what marriage is?

Perhaps, if you could tell me how it's relevant to this thread.

 

[Autodidact]

And how long did it take life on a dead planet to originate?

Start a thread; it's irrelevant to this one.

After that, how long did it take that life to become you?

Around 3.56 billion years, or so they tell me.

That equals approximately how many changes a year to accomplish that feat? (Note my sense of humor) One must assume that math is a more exact science than biology, perhaps?

No, I don't see the humor. I'm not a biologist, but in fact scientists did this exact math a hundred years ago and figured out it would need at least a billion years. Then it turned out that's what we have. Do you think they're stupid?

 

[doppelganger]

What the constitution requires is that we don't take religion and call it science.

Or at least that we don't do so using public money . . .

 

[Autodidact]

I think I know what your problem is, LIttleNipper--you've been reading Creationists, haven't you? What you need to know is that Creationists, and by that I mean true Young Earth Creationists (YEC) like Ken Hamm only have two kinds of statements, gibberish and lies. If you read them, you will become progressively more confused and ignorant, which is what I think has happened in your case.

btw, don't take my word for it. Point me to any Creationist website you like, and I'll find gibberish and lies on the first page with content on it.

Do you realize how stupid you sound, rejecting a theory when you don't even know what it is?

How old are you?

 

[themadhair]

How old are you?

Why do people ask this?

 

[tumbleweed41]

Why do people ask this?

Sometimes posts indicate immaturity. So clarification is required.

 

[Autodidact]

Why do people ask this?

Well, I'm trying to give the poor child an excuse for his combination of ignorance and arrogance.

 

[MysticPhD]

Is it possible that God exists? Yes.
Is it rational to attack science because it doesn't account for the supernatural? No. Mankind has established science to deal only with the natural world we live in.

Why must God be supernatural . . . some silly definitions or absurd descriptions by religionists? Who says you should NOT be dealing with the natural world?

 

[themadhair]

Why must God be supernatural . . . some silly definitions or absurd descriptions by religionists? Who says you should NOT dealing with the natural world?

Why bother to define your god? Why allow yourself to be constrained by making it possible to understand what you are advocating?