• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Evolutionists, where, geographically, did man evolve?

Looncall

Well-Known Member
Absolutely, a pebble would have the same mass whether there was anyone to place it on a balance.

There, however would be no knowledge or experience or existence of the words "mass" or "pebble" if there weren't a conscious, aware observer to name and observe, so one could never know such a thing.

No, I am not.

But the property would be there without an observer, contrary to your original assertion.
 

Akingu

Member
Evolutionists, where, what places, did man evolve separately? Good luck!
Asia, Africa and Europe, seeing as, scientifically, there are three distinct species of human: Caucasiod, Orientalis and Congoloid. Genetically, there is enough difference to separate them as such.
 

David M

Well-Known Member
Asia, Africa and Europe, seeing as, scientifically, there are three distinct species of human: Caucasiod, Orientalis and Congoloid. Genetically, there is enough difference to separate them as such.

No, there isn't enough. All humans are members of a single species.
 
Last edited:

Parsimony

Well-Known Member
Asia, Africa and Europe, seeing as, scientifically, there are three distinct species of human: Caucasiod, Orientalis and Congoloid. Genetically, there is enough difference to separate them as such.
They are all Homo sapiens and interbreed freely with one-another to produce fertile offspring.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Asia, Africa and Europe, seeing as, scientifically, there are three distinct species of human: Caucasiod, Orientalis and Congoloid. Genetically, there is enough difference to separate them as such.
These are not distinct species since they can and often do reproduce together. Also, if one looks at a bunch of skeletons or test various blood types from mixed sources, one simply cannot tell which "race" is which.
 

Monk Of Reason

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Asia, Africa and Europe, seeing as, scientifically, there are three distinct species of human: Caucasiod, Orientalis and Congoloid. Genetically, there is enough difference to separate them as such.
I think you mean races. There hasn't been anywhere near enough evolution for any sort of specialization to occur.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Please show us ONE EXAMPLE of something which is EVOLVING into something else, and please don't talk about MILLIONS OF YEARS.
Pretty much everything is evolving into something else, sometimes quickly, sometimes over millions of years.
Why the problem with millions of years? That's the timeline Nature works on.
If you're seriously interested in observed speciation, here's a site: Observed Instances of Speciation
 

gnostic

The Lost One
V
Please show us ONE EXAMPLE of something which is EVOLVING into something else, and please don't talk about MILLIONS OF YEARS.
Pretty much everything is evolving into something else, sometimes quickly, sometimes over millions of years.
Why the problem with millions of years?

It's called lack of imagination, lack of logic, and lack of education.

For SOME theistic folks (not all theists are like them, mind you), ignorance is bliss.
 

StopS

Member
Please show us ONE EXAMPLE of something which is EVOLVING into something else, and please don't talk about MILLIONS OF YEARS.

This makes it painfully clear that you should rather go and ask the experts on a biology forum, not a religious forum. Evolution is a fact and just because not everyone here is an evolutionary biologist and can adequately explain the process does not invalidate it one bit.
So why not educate yourself and ask the experts?
 
Top