Faith in Christ is Completely Logical

[Bunyip]

You will have to start the conversation again, if you wish to discuss it properly. God is visible everywhere. You just don't see him.

Like the Emperors New Clothes huh?. Ok.

 

[Robert.Evans]

Why would I need to do that? Why would I have to explain something that you can not explain anyway?

Blind and no alternative.. haha

 

[Robert.Evans]

That is a poor ad hominem attack.

no true, yours is the ad hominem attack

 

[Robert.Evans]

Like the Emperors New Clothes huh?. Ok.

blind people can't see, by definition.... that is the way it is. But don't attack those who can eh.

 

[Robert.Evans]

Intelligent design is not a theory - I told you that a few posts ago. there is no theory of intelligent design, not even a testable hypothesis. There is no theory for me to refute.

Why would I need to refute a theory that does not actually exist - other than as an unsubstantiated claim?

That depneds on how you define theory... now you know that, come on!

 

[Robert.Evans]

Intellignet design/creation is not a theory in the scientific use of the word.
This is where it seems that dishonesty is being used.

Now with the number of times the difference between scientific theory and layman theory has been explained, at what point does repeating the same false information becomes flat out lying?

There is nothing wrong with asking what there answer is if they think it is not another.

 

[Robert.Evans]

*
Patriarchy - not men. I like my men just fine.


*

ahhh... so you like mummy's boys, I see.

 

[Robert.Evans]

Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory.
It does not even cut it as a hypothesis.
You have not observed creation, at all, ever.
Alternative?
You mean like Abiogenesis?
You are also fine with a giant gap.
In fact, you love giant gaps simply because it gives you a place to stuff your god.
Until such time as you present something to refute...
I understand you think your ID "theory" is something grand, but it is nothing but you saying "goddidit".

And if goddidnotdoit, then naturaldidit. Or is it with you, I don't know, but you speak as one who knows..hmmm

 

[Robert.Evans]

Are you simply refusing to understand the difference or are you honestly that ignorant of the subject?
Either way, I fail to see how there can be an honest or productive discussion with you on this topic.

Well... goodbye then!

 

[Robert.Evans]

What I find funny is that you cannot accept that you do not know something and so stuff god in the gaps of your knowledge claiming it is not dishonest to do so.

How do ''you'' know it is dishonest when you keep saying 'I don;'t know'?

 

[Bunyip]

blind people can't see, by definition.... that is the way it is. But don't attack those who can eh.

I didn't mate, you are the one doing the attacking.

 

[Bunyip]

That depneds on how you define theory... now you know that, come on!

Youmhave been given the definition of a scientific theory. that has been explained to you a number of times Robert.

 

[Robert.Evans]

No you don't.
You merely over wallow in your shallow pigeon victory.

That's right, we can't refute you as you never say anything do you,... haha. Safe argument that!

 

[Robert.Evans]

Present something to refute.
bold empty claims are not something to refute.

You can't refute what we know as you can not discern what we can. False argument.

 

[Robert.Evans]

Now you are just being rude and dishonest. I'll leave you to it.

he is not... but your arguments are none existent

 

[Robert.Evans]

Are you going to present something or not?

let me help you out.
You should start out with a claim.
Then after the claim you should present support for the claim.

Now please understand that bold empty claims, claims of belief, and wishful thinking are not considered support for a claim.

Care to give it a try?

Now you know the argument better than that, as I have given it you. So why ignore the answer. Just because you don't see the argument, others do.

 

[Robert.Evans]

You are the one whining about others not refuting...

YOU are the one with NO argument adn a lack of spiritual discernment..

 

[Robert.Evans]

Mate, you are being dishonest. It is not slander to point out a fact.

Calling a chicken a banana does not make it a banana.

You need to stop calling people dishonest in a subject you know nothing about, and wish to know nothing about.

 

[Robert.Evans]

Nope. I am saying that your claim that if you call something a theory it is a theory was just silly

There are two kinds of theory

 

[Bunyip]

You need to stop calling people dishonest in a subject you know nothing about, and wish to know nothing about.

I am free to point out when somebody is being dishonest. Please desist with the ad hominem attacks.