I think what they are challenging is why do they have faith in the specific things they have faith in. A valid challenge.Isn't it about time that some people stopped challenging a person's faith by applying the principle of "proof"?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think what they are challenging is why do they have faith in the specific things they have faith in. A valid challenge.Isn't it about time that some people stopped challenging a person's faith by applying the principle of "proof"?
So clearly you don't understand what faith really is. Faith is being sure of what you hope for...Assurance needs evidence, otherwise it is a paper promise
Then you don't believe in "God’s will be done" for no man can know, without question, what His plan is. Or even what He is! And if you are being certain of what YOU hope for, and certain of what YOU do not see, you have not relinquished the physical world.No, you are wrong. Faith is being sure of what you hope for and certain of what you do not see.
I agree, but not in a material sense.Assurance needs evidence, otherwise it is a paper promise
If you have faith that the opposite direction coming driver will follow the same rules, you would have been long time dead by now.That's not what im saying at all. That's what you're saying. You have nothing but faith that the person driving at you from the opposite direction is going to follow the same rules as you.
I KNOW that most of what Christians believe is not the truth, and I don't need faith to know that, all I need is a Bible.Those of us who have faith KNOW it to be the truth.
Even if you have faith in yourself , it is not enough.If you have faith that the opposite direction coming driver will follow the same rules, you would have been long time dead by now.
I cannot speak for anyone else, but I do not denigrate any Christians because they have faith.These comments could just as easily been directed at some of the "experts" on this forum who denigrate Christians and our faith!
but most Christian beliefs are based on hope, especially the belief that Jesus is "coming back."Hebrews 11:1 It most definitely is not based on hope.
I KNOW that most of what Christians believe is not the truth, and I don't need faith to know that, all I need is a Bible.
Read Hebrews 11!Then you don't believe in "God’s will be done" for no man can know, without question, what His plan is. Or even what He is! And if you are being certain of what YOU hope for, and certain of what YOU do not see, you have not relinquished the physical world.
Faith is living with the humility that we know nothing, but it will still be alright, for HE knows all and will provide.
I will - but give me something from Jesus rather than Paul, please.Read Hebrews 11!
a) There is no evidence of who wrote the letter to the Hebrews. Some people think Paul wrote it, but many people disagree.I will - but give me something from Jesus rather than Paul, please.
True, but it is also believed the writer used the accumulated letters of Paul to base his "message and style."a) There is no evidence of who wrote the letter to the Hebrews. Some people think Paul wrote it, but many people disagree.
You make the assumption I'm Christian.b) The entire Bible is the Word of God. Jesus spoke almost exclusively to the Jews (before His resurrection), so in many cases His words are not applicable to Christians.
Good luck with that. Nothing in the Bible is "from Jesus" since Jesus did not write anything.I will - but give me something from Jesus rather than Paul, please.
True, but his teachings, his life, and his death are what the Christian faith is supposedly based on, so what is credited to him as his teaching should overrule the tenets of a later Apostle fosterling. As the author of 2 Peter stated: "...brother Paul wrote to you...There are some things in them hard to understand...", Paul and his follower's tenets always should be weighed against those of Christ, or one is actually following Paulinity rather than Christianity.Good luck with that. Nothing in the Bible is "from Jesus" since Jesus did not write anything.
I agree, but I do not necessarily believe that the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are an accurate depiction of his teachings, life and death.True, but his teachings, his life, and his death are what the Christian faith is supposedly based on, so what is credited to him as his teaching should overrule the tenets of a later Apostle fosterling.
Unfortunately, Paulinity is Christianity, for all intents and purposes.As the author of 2 Peter stated: "...brother Paul wrote to you...There are some things in them hard to understand...", Paul and his follower's tenets always should be weighed against those of Christ, or one is actually following Paulinity rather than Christianity.
It's not the same thing.Just feeling sure doesn't mean that your feeling is well-placed.
If you have faith that you're going to win the lottery next week, should you max out your credit card today?
Not sure what you mean by that when you said you find what Jesus wanted to express to the Jews moire relevant to you r beliefs than Paul and his followers.I am Omnist with Christian background but stronger leanings towards Judaism than Christianity. IOW, I find what Jesus wanted to express to the Jews more relevant to my beliefs than Paul and his followers messages to Gentiles.