Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
It does if you don't have the basic training to understand what the basis for the expert advice is and how to evaluate it effectively.
How much microbiology have you had? How well do you understand vaccine technology? How much epidemiology have you had? How much training in infectious disease? How much statistics have you had? Did you know what R0 meant previous to two years ago?
Unless you have actually read textbooks on these topics, you are unlikely to really understand what is going on, even if you have all the relevant data.
Experts are experts for a reason: they have the experience, knowledge, and background to evaluate things in their specialty better than even a relatively educated lay person can.
Most people are probably not experts in these fields so pro/anti vaxxers make decisions based on what they are given. Trying to differentiate what's fact and what's not I guess has more to do with trusting what facts you are given.
I don't even trust my personal doctors 100%. When we make decisions about my health we work things out together. Very different than CDC. It would be logical in and of itself to go to your doctor before taking anything but unlike medicines, I'm sure vaccines in and of themselves are near harmless. I'm at least glad CDC is reporting these highly possible side affects to the vaccines if not anything else.