Fate of the Earth

[muhammad_isa]

I see so you can’t discuss you just insult.

I can discuss.
..but whose suffering are you talking about?
Rich people who are becoming poorer .. or poor people who are starving/dying?

If you look at my profile, you will see I'm from the UK.
We have a new prime Minister.
She has said that energy costs will be capped for 2 years. Very reassuring to those of us who are relatively poor.

I imagine your Republican friends wouldn't be in favour of such policies.
..and that is from a Conservativee PM .. not Labour.
I know these issues are serious.

 

[InChrist]

But would you purposely trash your house if you knew that someday (just not when) it would be destroyed?

Ecclesiastes 3:19. We all share one breath.

I wouldn’t trash my house or anyone’s. There’s a verse in Revelation that seems pretty clear that those who destroy the earth will be destroyed. I have further thoughts about that, but I won’t get into those now.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

we have had the Nuke option for a long time. It’s been all but killed in the US and not by the party beholden to the oil companies.

I am not opposed to nuclear power per se, especially as technology increases the safety of these plants.

But it's another party that has stunted the growth of climate change responses that could have made our transitions away from fossil fuels easier.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

So you trust data sets (which are easy to fake) Over people acting in their own best interest and survival?

Nope, not what I stated.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

If we know the cause, but we have a theory and a lot of data that does not fit the theory.

Could you elaborate?

 

[Truth in love]

I am not opposed to nuclear power per se, especially as technology increases the safety of these plants.

But it's another party that has stunted the growth of climate change responses that could have made our transitions away from fossil fuels easier.

The party that says you can do what you want we just are not going to force tax payers to pay for it?

 

[Truth in love]

Could you elaborate?

“Man made climate change” (more or less) is almost entirely blamed on CO2.
CO2 is so powerful that it melted the ice caps on mars.

It’s melting ours also even through we had some of the biggest sea ice growth a few years back.

Mae have unprecedented levels of CO2, but we keep seeing that the temperatures are within historical levels.

This “science theory” does not follow the facts.

 

[metis]

We see what happens when some put more faith in their politically motivated media than what the climate scientists are rather clearly aware of.

 

[rational experiences]

Theists tell you what they already understand. As storytelling is first not maths. To theory.

As humans know they don't own any space law or control of natural creation.

They only own machines that do destructive reactions.

As Theists lie or tell the truth.

A lying theist doesn't talk about destructive earth mass changes owned by space and time light as laws. When humans destroy what space had owned. Earths created present mass.

Converting he says.

Pretend they arent doing anything bad.

Yet invention plus machines dont exist in cosmic law. Nature of.

Other theists believe that humans can actually alter space and time. Then try to explain how and why.

That status is awareness.

And the theme is still actually just about human built machines and mass reaction. Humans science.

Therefore we do know.

Humans therefore are predicting an earth mass space time shift. As we do not own cosmic causes. It's not science it's just humans awareness.

Mass removed opens more space. Changes all pressures. Earths mass in space then shifts.

We expected a natural space void vacuum moment 2012. It hasn't occurred yet as new nuclear mass removal is adding into the large event.

Weve had small responses demonstrated by experiment. Man had already legally promised to never practice nuclear science again.

As you've been waiting for the ancient science caused event yourselves.

A very big earth event.

You already knew how life threatening it would be as no man is God. Earth planetary is naturally reactive bodily in its nature without science adding into larger causes.

 

[Audie]

I saw yet another “climate change will ruin everything” post. I also just finished some Bible reading with the family

Isa 13:
10 For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.

13 Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the Lord of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger.



So this is coming why would I worry about the little stuff?


Thoughts?

It isn't coming

 

[rational experiences]

Men of science lied.
So did men summarising science by looking back after changes as a medical religion lie. About science.

Science says religious deceit using fake science terminology is very dangerous.

Contradiction right and wrong anything men chose.

As we are only meant as family to live balanced on earth with its naturally reactive earth conditions. No human controls. Reactions stop theirself.

So science is very concerned with new old fake thesis. As Jesus men terms want eternal. Man was the Lord of trade with rich man king brother who made the mistake nuclear technology.

Messed with their heads.

Life did get horrifically Sacrificed by man's science choice and those terms are not fake.

Men says eternal hell is frozen. So his eternal terms states two terms. It doesn't own two terms in natural law.

Eternal hell man stated only as a he thinker got his machine. Hot melt cooled melt. Reaction just from hell.

Eternal hell first it's own mass highest law status only in created creation terms.

He says I want a non stop resource as he's greedy.

That living position to be greedy is fake in life's natural law. Very dangerous. By design civilisation status only greed became human expressed and fake.

He says if only a machines reaction could heal like humans to have energy mass put back not be sick. Like humans. We don't get energy we just survive in bio chemistry status. Minerals in water. We eat drink survive we put in and put back ourselves.

About our life. Lying. As the law machine reaction doesn't do it. Get sick survive then exist as you did before.

So he fakes laws and fakes stories. It's his confession I lied. As he did.

His new machine got sick falsely it overheated. Vacuum void law stopped it blowing up. Pretty basic.

He makes holes in reactions inside his eternal hell machine as nothing spaces ...so it doesn't fill back up with energy. It's very hot. Frozen would be instantly gone. Law space.

So then he changes his story fake already. Says eternal I now claim is infinite. As space is the only body that remains itself in law yet replaced itself and becomes greater as a nothing body no losses just increased.

Space opens by energies removal into greater amassed space. Nothingness not eternal either.

Is the human who wants us all destroyed. Who writes the documents about how his human practiced nuclear sciences get you destroyed.

He was stopped. He predicted he would begin again around 1900 to early 2000 where new human sickness life's destruction by heavens change phenomena again....all the same reasons.

Men and technology lying. Lying and coercing about anyone anything if they can seat public control. Coercing their game always was.

So science knows it's wrong about trying to remove religious medical human brain entrainment by meditative sound voice therapy vibration. Sounds to soothe.

A place to be healed attended potents of remedies. Smells like frankincense sticks myrrh...used for cancer treatments. To be family loved. Nurtured to feel safe in ceremony.

Yet the scientific statements are wrong.

I know men say I don't believe in spirit creation. Who cares scientist you're just theist thinkers egotists. Science your occult branch proved it had come from a spirit place by conjured presence.

The eternal in its real form does exist our parents came out of it. Recording in our side life as a state in heavens recorded it. I saw the vision of our mother.

They weren't Jesus. They came out of the eternal left it. Once only origin life. Jesus the story of Rock changed by men who lived already as a human inside heavens was human king lord of science.

The baby man who caused the sacrifice of human life. Looked back said sex was evil. As the old was in review as new experiences....Bare naked earth covered up by the garden life his personal thesis a beginning of my life oxygenated supported.

Looking back after conscious brain prickled burnt...false Theist advices only. As Theism was evil themes against life on earth.

Why Jesus wasn't eternal. Just natural atmospheric cooling. The cooling above saved us. His imagery changed was the advice. AI history the visionary imaged stories heavens caused changed.

Mythical themes in fact.

Yet the term how image dies returns image by heated upper causes interacts with us as bio family assistance. Via waters oxygen replaced living after microbes of life were carbon burnt....cooled replaced Is real.

Is why science said religious belief fake as science and is dangerous. As they consciously know by innate awareness.

Yet some of the laws taught are pertinent truths.

The real eternal does still exist itself. Owns no argument about it as it's not science. It's the actual term man of science tried to theory upon as where and how did created creation and space emerge.

Just a thought. Not a reality. As men's ego thinking is proven very dangerous in natural life. The history of your choices proves it is.

Bad behaviour like bad children...yet the evil choices of that badness is innate cruelty. It has to stop by telling our truth.

 

[Muffled]

hopefully things will work out

I believe that God may be in judgment mode and things will get worse.

 

[Muffled]

Why are so many self-proclaim "conservatives" being so willing to ignore reality and let myriads of people suffer and die even though they may claim to be "Christian"? According to very recent studies, global warming is accelerating at a faster rate that even projected only a few years ago.

I believe the reality is that no-one is doing anything that will make a difference.

 

[metis]

I believe the reality is that no-one is doing anything that will make a difference.

If that's the case, then why are you here?

 

[Hockeycowboy]

I saw yet another “climate change will ruin everything” post. I also just finished some Bible reading with the family

Isa 13:
10 For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.

13 Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the Lord of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger.



So this is coming why would I worry about the little stuff?


Thoughts?

Earth can mean people as in Genesis 11:1.
Not necessarily the planet.

 

[Hockeycowboy]

Keep in mind Revelation 11:18, last sentence.
IMO, God will step in before it’s totally ruined.

I mean, the Scripture is actually telling us that men would be ruining the Earth, in the Last Days!
IMO.

 

[Truth in love]

Earth can mean people as in Genesis 11:1.
Not necessarily the planet.

It can, but many statements about the earth that align with this, don't fit it being about people..

• desert shall rejoice, and blossom as the rose, Isa. 35:1.
  
  
• every mountain and hill shall be made low, Isa. 40:4.
  
  
• way in the wilderness, and rivers in the desert, Isa. 43:19.
  
  
• make her wilderness like Eden, and her desert like the garden, Isa. 51:3
  
  
• mountains shall depart, Isa. 54:10
  
  
• Instead of the thorn shall come up the fir tree, Isa. 55:13.
  
  
• create new heavens and a new earth, Isa. 65:17 66:22; 2 Pet. 3:13; Rev. 21:1;

 

[Hockeycowboy]

You’re right about most of these. But are you sure about all of these?
Let’s take this one…

create new heavens and a new earth, Isa. 65:17 66:22; 2 Pet. 3:13; Rev. 21:1;

Look at how Peter worded 2 Peter 3 ….
After stating the worldwide destruction the Flood caused, Peter said “the heavens and the earth that now exist”, or “the present heavens and earth”, etc… IOW, different than the ones that existed before the Deluge, indicating not literal.
Look at BibleHub:
2 Peter 3:7 And by that same word, the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.

Heavens can be used symbolically, too.

Here’s a link to a thread discussing these things:
"New Heavens and New Earth" - Why Destroy the Old?

IMO

 

[Truth in love]

You’re right about most of these. But are you sure about all of these?
Let’s take this one…




Look at how Peter worded 2 Peter 3 ….
After stating the worldwide destruction the Flood caused, Peter said “the heavens and the earth that now exist”, or “the present heavens and earth”, etc… IOW, different than the ones that existed before the Deluge, indicating not literal.
Look at BibleHub:
2 Peter 3:7 And by that same word, the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.

Heavens can be used symbolically, too.

Here’s a link to a thread discussing these things:
"New Heavens and New Earth" - Why Destroy the Old?

IMO

It can be, but I don’t think that is always is. New can mean greatly changed not 100% brand new off the shelf.

 

[Hockeycowboy]

New can mean greatly changed not 100% brand new off the shelf.

Yes I agree. Like at Revelation 21:5…”I am making all things new.” Not ‘all new things.’