• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

For all Trump Supporters

BSM1

BSM1

What? Me worry?
columbus said:
Take the white rural "affirmative action" of the Electoral College away and Clinton would have won in a landslide.

But Trump supporters don't believe in democracy. They believe in something else.
Tom
Click to expand...


I think you've missed the point. Hillary only won the majority in one or two states. If she were our Potus then should have been elected by only winning two or three states. This is not representation, The electoral college keeps us from suffering this type of lopsided election.
 
BSM1

BSM1

What? Me worry?
metis said:
Take away the low-information voters and Trump wouldn't have won a single state. :p
Click to expand...

Now your are paraphrasing Rush Limbaugh (which is probably flattering to Rush) while insulting over half of the population of this country.
 
BSM1

BSM1

What? Me worry?
columbus said:
No wonder you're a Trump supporter.
Tom
Click to expand...

I supported a person who, IMHO, had the best interests of Americans at heart, was not in it for power only, and who's first lady would have been easier to look at for four years.
 
BSM1

BSM1

What? Me worry?
columbus said:
Just like you believe that Clinton only won in 1 or 2 states.
The ability of Trump supporters to believe in their "alternative facts" world is staggering.
Tom
Click to expand...

This is not speculation nor wishful thinking. Check the map; Clinton won very, very few states.
 
Evangelicalhumanist

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Wait until Trump's latest attack on financial regulations starts bringing back the financial crisis of 2008 - and this will come to pass. These new rules are 110% friendly to his big business pals, and -10% friendly to the base that elected him. Trump wouldn't care about ordinary people, even if he did recognize who and what they were (which he doesn't).

The buyers remorse in the US is going to be "yuuuuge!"

Spoken by somebody with an analytical -- rather than partisan -- bent. But I'll bet everything that I'm right.
 
Scuba Pete

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
Evangelicalhumanist said:
Wait until Trump's latest attack on financial regulations
Click to expand...
The last time the Republicans controlled The House, The Senate and the Presidency was the year prior to the Great Depression. Imagine that. Bush will no longer be regarded as the worst president in history.
 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
columbus said:
The "American

The "American public" voted for Clinton by a margin of millions. But this isn't a democracy so that doesn't matter to the outcome.
But don't say things like that when they are demonstrably false, OK?
Tom
Click to expand...
Most eligible voters chose to vote for neither, about half just staying home.
Hillary can hardly claim that a plurality of the popular vote is approval of her.
metis said:
Take away the low-information voters and Trump wouldn't have won a single state. :p
Click to expand...
You guys (Hilda fans) keep attacking us "deplorables" for electing the least worst of the two. It appears you believe it should be obvious that Hillary was God's own choice to lead us to the promised land. Yet we stoically endure, without personally attacking you for voting for the Hildabeast. Unlike you, we tolerate difference. We understand that you have different values, & that it's reasonable for you to prefer the one who favors war, taxes, regulation, corruption & incompetence.
Why the asymmetry?
It's not that we're better than you are. Tis just that you're overly sensitive
snowflakes, anguished by dashed dreams of your anointed one ruling us all.
OK....maybe we are better.
 
Last edited:
esmith

esmith

Veteran Member
Revoltingest said:
Most eligible voters chose to vote for neither, about half just staying home.
Hillary can hardly claim that a plurality of the popular vote is approval of her.

You guys (Hilda fans) keep attacking us "deplorables" for electing the least worst of the two. It appears you believe it should be obvious that Hillary was God's own choice to lead us to the promised land. Yet we stoically endure, without personally attacking you voting for the Hildabeast. Unlike you, we tolerate difference. We understand that you have different values, & that it's reasonable for you to prefer the one who favors war, taxes, regulation, corruption & incompetence.
Why the asymmetry?
It's not that we're better than you are. Tis just that you're overly sensitive
snowflakes, anguished by dashed dreams of your anointed ruling us all.
OK....maybe we are better.
Click to expand...
upload_2017-2-4_8-1-55.jpeg
 
idav

idav

Being
Premium Member
Revoltingest said:
It's not that we're better than you are. Tis just that you're overly sensitive
snowflakes, anguished by dashed dreams of your anointed one ruling us all.
OK....maybe we are better.
Click to expand...
If by anointed one you mean "not Trump" yes they had quite a following.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top