Then my vote is "Absolutely Not".
Satan is the affirmation that man is selfish and doomed to evil. It represents the animal struggle for survival, or jungle law, so Satanists are the ones who fight for their own good, and destroy the good of mankind. [Many of the Founding Fathers were freemasons and they drafted the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. These documents give freedom to citizens; including those who disagree with the Masons. "Equal Protection Under The Law" and "Freedom of Religion" certainly are not freedoms that would be given to all citizens had the Masons been simply "looking out after their own good".]
Satanism is the pursue of greed and money-hunger. That's what I meant when I said that money-hunger is devilish. [Freemasons have many members; some of those members share the value you are describing, others do not. If the organization, itself, were founded on this principle, those who do not share that value would not be admitted.]
Satan is the negation that man can become altruistic, pure and sinless, through renounce and sacrifice. [As freemasons do not allow serious felons into their ranks, as they allow Christians into their ranks, then the organization itself does not promotes this value; if the organization did promote this value, likely they would not allow those who do not share this value into their ranks].
Satan is the negation of Love towards the neighbor, and the affirmation of love toward oneself. [As the Freemasons are known to give generously to not for profit organizations that are striving to feed the hungry, clothe the poor and heal the sick, then I'd say that the freemasons do not meet this definition].
Satan is the soul's death. [I can not adequately respond to this definition as the presence of a "soul" is something I do not believe even exists].