Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This is a great one. Recently there have been copyright claims on videos that feature MS Subhalakshmi's voice, so get the last one while it's hot!
Can you tell me in your devotion to God why the Bhagavad Gita is taken as completely dictated by Him even though Chaitanya focused on acintya bhed abheda tatwa as far as I understand it and never brought the Gita in to support his devotion?Nitai! My humble dandavat pranam to the users of this forum. On the request of Ratikala ji, I have started this thread so that we can discuss the theology of Lord Gaur Nitai and the acharyas of Gaudiya Vaishanvism; and its siddhanta of Achintya Bhedabheda. I shall try and post content in a regular manner from the works of our previous Acharayas. If you also have any questions or doubts about our Philosophy, please feel free to ask, and I shall try (with my miniscule knowledge) answer it. There has been alot of ignorance regarding our Sampradaya sadly, and it is my hope that through this thread we can resolve some of the objections put forth. Nitai Gaur Premanande, Hari Hari Bol!
(Below is a photo of the deities of Lord Sri Nityananda Mahaprabhu, Lord Sri Chaitanya (Gauranga) and Lord Adwaita Acharaya. They are presently situated in Sri Ekachakra Dhama, the most merciful of tirthas.)
View attachment 11615
Can you tell me in your devotion to God why the Bhagavad Gita is taken as completely dictated by Him even though Chaitanya focused on acintya bhed abheda tatwa as far as I understand it and never brought the Gita in to support his devotion?
Can you give me the acintya bhed abheda philosophy in 50-100 words, in simple English?Like all Vaishnav schools, Lord Chaitanya's acintya bhedabheda philosophy accepts the Vedas (and its respective branches) as the word of God. Gita is one of these texts. Scripture (Sabda pranam) is the proof that is used to support acintya bhedabheda. Of all the scriptures however, we accept Srimad Bhagavatam as the ultimate conclusion, being the fully ripened fruit of the Vedic tree (nigama kalpa taror amritam phalam). In the discussion of Vedanta between Sarvabhauma Bhattacharya and Lord Chaitanya Mahaprabhu; Lord Chaitanya gives the following instructions to Sarvabhauma:
pramāṇera madhye śruti pramāṇa--pradhāna
śruti ye mukhyārtha kahe, sei se pramāṇa
"Of all standards of proof, scripture holds the ultimate authority. It is only the primary meaning of sruti which forms this proof"
jīvera asthi-viṣṭhā dui--śaṅkha-gomaya
śruti-vākye sei dui mahā-pavitra haya
"Conchshells and cow dung are nothing but the bones and the stool of some living entities, but according to the Vedic version they are both considered very pure"
svataḥ-pramāṇa veda satya yei kaya
'lakṣaṇā' karile svataḥ-prāmāṇya-hāni haya
"The Vedic statements are self-evident. Whatever is stated there must be accepted. If we interpret according to our own imagination, the authority of the Vedas is immediately lost."
yā yā śrutir jalpati nirviśeṣaṁ
sā sābhidhatte sa-viśeṣam eva
vicāra-yoge sati hanta tāsāṁ
prāyo balīyaḥ sa-viśeṣam eva"
"Whatever Vedic mantras describe the Absolute Truth impersonally only prove in the end that the Absolute Truth is a person. The Supreme Lord is understood in two features-impersonal and personal. If one considers the Supreme Personality of Godhead in both features, he can actually understand the Absolute Truth. He knows that the personal understanding is stronger because we see that everything is full of variety. No one can see anything that is not full of variety."
In the remainder of the chapter, the Lord very beautiful elaborates on the philosophy of Acintya Bhedabheda.
Can you give me the acintya bhed abheda philosophy in 50-100 words, in simple English?
I think you repeated this like a 10 times, same content...I think tattvapravah would be good enough to explain this.The soul is both one and different from the absolute truth Sri Krsna. Just like sparks coming from a fire can be called qualitatively one, yet quantitatively different for its source; similarly the soul is a minute particle of the effulgence of Sri Krsna
I think you repeated this like a 10 times, same content...I think tattvapravah would be good enough to explain this.
anyway are you saying soul is a part of Krushna ? both are same entity ? In which sense they are one and which sense they are different ? care to explain ?
Spark and flame are not different, fundamentally. Spark can become an Inferno so can flame.Like a spark from a flame, or the rays of the sun, the jiva is a tiny fragment of the Lord's Brahmajyoti. It can never be God (in quantity) though coming from Him (hence why Jivas are Sat Cid Ananda). Hence acintya bhedabheda (inconceivable oneness and difference)
Dear Nitai!
Spark and flame are not different, fundamentally. Spark can become an Inferno so can flame.
A Query, Are all jivas same or different? What differentiates jivas?
The problem is it never was a spark to begin with, there's just fire everywhere. It only imagined itself to be a spark and then came up with philosophies to justify its imaginations.Then it no-longer remains a spark does it?
The problem is it never was a spark to begin with, there's just fire everywhere. It only imagined itself to be a spark and then came up with philosophies to justify its imaginations.
Hare KrishnaHahahaha, very nice. In the words of Abba "There's a fire within my soul". Hopefully there is fire (even if it is just is a spark) of love for Sri Krsna in mine .
It can never be God (in quantity)
I think it is important here to note the use of the word quantity. Would it then be correct to say that the jiva is of the same QUALITY as Shri Krishna? Like a drop of water is made of exactly the same atoms and bonds adds the ocean but itself can never BE an ocean?
Well, you are thinking of a drop of water and the ocean as two separate things. The fact (for me) is that it is only the ocean, there is no separate drop.
Jai Sri Krishna.
:dance:
Well, you are thinking of a drop of water and the ocean as two separate things. The fact (for me) is that it is only the ocean, there is no separate drop.
Jai Sri Krishna.
:dance: