• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Genesis 2

outhouse

Atheistically
This is not proselyting any more than your continuing to promote the theory of evolution,etc.

Nonsense, utter nonsense.


I deal with facts, education and knowledge.


Who do you think you are to discount knowledge that is not only credible, but not even disputed by anyone with any credibility.


You only bring blind faith, without any evidence at all and no credibility what so ever. :facepalm:
 

sincerly

Well-Known Member
False, you only believe the assumptions of mankind written thousands of years ago. All the while ignorant to not only how the book was written but modern science as well.



You are not the judge of who will or will not go into a such a place, if it did exist outside mythology. DO YOU UNDERSTAND, you are no judge here.:facepalm:

You don't have a clue who would or would not be accepted.

If you read correctly, there was no judging, just an informing of the message of the Scriptures. You do know the difference.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
If you read correctly, there was no judging, just an informing of the message of the Scriptures. You do know the difference.

No

You are playing judge and jury, telling people about what will happen if they gamble with a very unique faith only you and a small group of theist hold.

Who do you think you are? Your no divine messenger with a correct version of anything to tell.


Your just the opposite of a divine messenger, your trying to promote thinking that would put us in the dark ages if we let you. You discount known credible knowledge that is not refuted by anyone that has credibility.

YOU only promote those with no credibility at all.
 

sincerly

Well-Known Member
No

You are playing judge and jury, telling people about what will happen if they gamble with a very unique faith only you and a small group of theist hold.

Who do you think you are? Your no divine messenger with a correct version of anything to tell.


Your just the opposite of a divine messenger, your trying to promote thinking that would put us in the dark ages if we let you. You discount known credible knowledge that is not refuted by anyone that has credibility.

YOU only promote those with no credibility at all.

I was revealing the Truths of the Scriptures; but keep repeating that which "seems right unto you".
 

outhouse

Atheistically
I was revealing the Truths of the Scriptures; but keep repeating that which "seems right unto you".


Your no one to even try and reveal anything to do with scripture, let alone the truth. :facepalm:


You have only revealed your unsubstantiated opinion, nothing more :slap:


If you want to deabte, you need more then faith and opinion.
 

sincerly

Well-Known Member
Your no one to even try and reveal anything to do with scripture, let alone the truth. :facepalm:


You have only revealed your unsubstantiated opinion, nothing more :slap:


If you want to deabte, you need more then faith and opinion.

Hi outhouse, I see you are projecting again.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Hi outhouse, I see you are projecting again.

I see you rstill in denial of facts

Young Earth creationism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The scientific consensus, supported by a 2006 statement by 68 national and international science academies, is that it is evidence-based fact derived from observations and experiments in multiple scientific disciplines that the universe has existed for around 13.8 billion years and that the Earth was formed about 4.5 billion years ago, with life first appearing at least 2.5 billion years ago
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
What you read is immaterial. What's actually on the page? Water. Above a rigid dome, upon which are fixed the sun and moon. That's what's on the page. it's WRONG.

I didn't see the word 'dome' as I read it.
Didn't see the sun and moon as fixed either.

What is material is the substance....and Spirit as the Cause.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Are we now moving to a discussion of existence prior to substance?

Are we still using Genesis as the reference and the point of discussion?
(this is not the science portion of the forum.)
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
"Solid" like in what sense?? solid Stone or solid air?

The long-held belief with earlier Jews and Christians, based on the use of the term "firmament", was that when you looked up there was a dome overhead whereas clouds, the sun, the moon, and stars were under the dome, but water, God, and the angels were above it. When it rained, it was water going through holes in the dome controlled by God, and when angels came down, they could go through those holes.

Since people couldn't fly back then, there was no way they could tell the difference. Thus the tower of Babel, and the implication was that going higher than the dome was for not for us mortals as that was God's domain.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Are we now moving to a discussion of existence prior to substance?

Are we still using Genesis as the reference and the point of discussion?
(this is not the science portion of the forum.)

We are dealing with one literalist error after another.

We are not dealing with YOUR personal imagination at the moment.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
air can't be solid. Unless if you are talking about the literal atoms.


The books clearly state the firmament was solid in the sense it was a barrier that kept water off the earth.


It was based on pervious Mesopotamian mythology used in both Gen 1 and Gen 2 finished possibly in Mesopotamia before the return from exile.
 

sincerly

Well-Known Member
The books clearly state the firmament was solid in the sense it was a barrier that kept water off the earth.

It was based on pervious Mesopotamian mythology used in both Gen 1 and Gen 2 finished possibly in Mesopotamia before the return from exile.

Moses was before the 70 years of "exile"/captivity for NOT adhering to the "thus saith the Lord GOD".
What mankind has devised in his imagination and accepted as truth as seen by Eve and the Serpent/as well as the flood---and still today as attested to in/with the "theory of evolution" with its component parts---continues.

Therefore, I do not take Gesenius's lexicon totally. The Scriptures state Gen.1:14-18, that the sun, moon, and stars are "in the "firmament".
Isa.40:12-14, reads,"Who hath measured the waters in the hollow of his hand, and meted out heaven with the span, and comprehended the dust of the earth in a measure, and weighed the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance? Who hath directed the Spirit of the LORD, or being his counsellor hath taught him? With whom took he counsel, and who instructed him, and taught him in the path of judgment, and taught him knowledge, and shewed to him the way of understanding?"
Paul then wrote from that:

Rom.11:33-34, "O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out! For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor? "

And you fault me for not believing the opinions of puny man rather than the Creator GOD??
 

outhouse

Atheistically
And you fault me for not believing the opinions of puny man rather than the Creator GOD??
:biglaugh:

only puny men wrote the bible.


to date no god has ever written a word. :facepalm:



Do I trust scientist and universities over your nonsense?, absolutely I know your factually in error. :slap:
 

sincerly

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by sincerly
And you fault me for not believing the opinions of puny man rather than the Creator GOD??

:biglaugh:

only puny men wrote the bible.

to date no god has ever written a word. :facepalm:

Do I trust scientist and universities over your nonsense?, absolutely I know your factually in error. :slap:

There is nothing new in your post--- in your conclusions and the same smiles.
 
Top