Genesis 2

[sincerly]

Originally Posted by sincerly View Post
Disobedience/disbelief/doubt will be prevalent as long as this world stands.
All those who do not distinguish between what is False and what is Truth will not advance to that next level--the NEW earth.

That's OK, I will stick with the one REAL life were given.

Anything ales at this time is imagination.

And "this life" one has is real and ends in death---a very short life-span when compared to eternity as promised on the earth made new.

Yes, the imagination of mankind has been shown to be evil and destructive of its own life---through disobedience and doubt.

 

[outhouse]

Originally Posted by sincerly View Post
Disobedience/disbelief/doubt will be prevalent as long as this world stands.
All those who do not distinguish between what is False and what is Truth will not advance to that next level--the NEW earth.




.

LEARN THE QUOTE FEATURE


It is one thing to face scientific ignorance, not being able to figure a simple quote feature is a bit too much from someone just proselytizing faith.

 

[sincerly]

Originally Posted by sincerly View Post
Hi TL, Reason is the result that has been understood when knowledge has rightly been seen in the light of wisdom.
No supreme being is found in investigating the "big-bang" Theory of evolution Nor in the spontaneous appearance of "Life".

Why do people insist that belief in the big bang and biological evolution are mutually exclusive from the belief in God? I believe in the big bang and evolution, and reject creationism and intelligent design (just as 99.9% of the scientific community does) all while believing in a deity.

Hi TL, There is a difference between "GOD" and "deity/god/reason".

It's the .1% who are NOT the "Scientific community" who make up the majority of the people and it is the remnant of those who see and understand "life" comes from "life" and one can not "get something" from "nothing".

 

[sincerly]

LEARN THE QUOTE FEATURE


It is one thing to face scientific ignorance, not being able to figure a simple quote feature is a bit too much from someone just proselytizing faith.

I quoted from my previous post very adequately and to my satisfaction---thank you. I have been defending the Scriptural account of Creation of all things. It is you who has been proselytizing man-made theories/opinions.

 

[Thief]

Hey what ever gets your through the night.

Just keep faith a safe thing attributing what ever you want with no evidence.

Not what I want....just what is.

no evidence?....of course not.

 

[outhouse]

no evidence?....of course not.

Exactly, that places the context into the same one imagination and wishful thinking lies in.

 

[outhouse]

I quoted from my previous post very adequately and to my satisfaction.

To bad. Its not about what you think or your satisfaction.


If we left things up to you, doctors would train I a bible

 

[sincerly]

Originally Posted by sincerly View Post
I quoted from my previous post very adequately and to my satisfaction.

To bad. Its not about what you think or your satisfaction.

I use/or quote from sources. I trust that you are NOT saying that I must "quote" as expressed by you. We still(for a while longer) have the ability to freely choose our own methods to do things---even to disobey the GOD who Created us human beings.

If we left things up to you, doctors would train I a bible

Doctors train in accordance to the way we Humans "were fearfully and wonderfully" Created by the Creator GOD.

 

[sincerly]

Originally Posted by Thief View Post

no evidence?....of course not.

Exactly, that places the context into the same one imagination and wishful thinking lies in.

And the "context" was IAP statement where they admitted that "many detail" were still unknown="no evidence".

And the IAP statement is placed in, as you admit in, "the same one imagination and wishful thinking lies in."

 

[JM2C]

Oh please... Religious people have perfected the art of "imagining vain things." Finding Virgin Marys in their grilled cheese sandwiches and images of Jesus in the mold on their shower curtain and such... When is the last time you've heard of an atheist/agnostic/deist finding an image of Carl Sagan or Charles Darwin in their grilled cheese sandwich?

You are talking about Catholics here. As a Born Again Christian I don't do that. God is a Spirit: and they That worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth.

 

[outhouse]

Doctors train in accordance to the way we Humans "were fearfully and wonderfully" Created by the Creator GOD.

No god mythology is used in training any credible doctor.


Creation is pseudoscience, and thus not any part of any credible university.

 

[Thief]

There's a lot of science in Chapter Two.

I find it remarkable the notion of anesthesia, surgery, cloning, genetic manipulation, are all present.

Eve is a clone....she had no navel.
Adam was given his twin sister for a bride.

That's a lot of detail for a myth.

 

[outhouse]

There's a lot of science in Chapter Two.

There is only religion.

And primitive science, now perverted to pseudoscience by way to many ignorant people.

I find it remarkable the notion of anesthesia, surgery, cloning, genetic manipulation, are all present.

Eve is a clone....she had no navel.

You don't have a clue if there was even an Eve at all.

Adam was given his twin sister for a bride.

That's a lot of detail for a myth.

They had to explain what they did not know.

It is only man that perverts the original context in a specific time period.

 

[Triumphant_Loser]

There's a lot of science in Chapter Two.

I find it remarkable the notion of anesthesia, surgery, cloning, genetic manipulation, are all present.

Eve is a clone....she had no navel.
Adam was given his twin sister for a bride.

That's a lot of detail for a myth.

No... Eve was not a "clone," or else she would have been genetically identical to her source (Adam), which is not true because she was obviously female, and Adam was male, so scientifically speaking, she was not a clone. Try again.

 

[Thief]

No... Eve was not a "clone," or else she would have been genetically identical to her source (Adam), which is not true because she was obviously female, and Adam was male, so scientifically speaking, she was not a clone. Try again.

Like this.....
Put the Man to sleep....anesthesia.
Cut a rib out of him....surgery.
Increase that sample to full stature....cloning.
Force the clone to form as a female....genetic manipulation.

She would be his twin sister.
She would have no navel.

 

[gnostic]

cloning is not making a sister.

if god was using cloning, there would be another Adam (2 Adams); in another word, cloning would result in two males, not one-male and one-female.

clearly you don't understand what cloning is, thief.

 

[Thief]

cloning is not making a sister.

if god was using cloning, there would be another Adam (2 Adams); in another word, cloning would result in two males, not one-male and one-female.

clearly you don't understand what cloning is, thief.

Don't skip the source of the material.....
Don't skip the manipulation....

You assume less of me than you should.

 

[outhouse]

Like this.....
Put the Man to sleep....anesthesia.
Cut a rib out of him....surgery.

Your god is so weak he had to act like a human to do something???


Nice you placing limits on gods


Now if could place limits on imagination, you would have something.

 

[outhouse]

clearly you don't understand what cloning is, thief.

That's just the beginning of lack of understanding in my opinion.

You have the mythology trail down, where he refuses to accept it. Perversion of the original scripture seems to be the norm here.

 

[Ouroboros]

Your god is so weak he had to act like a human to do something???

Nice you placing limits on gods

And placing limits on "spirit" as well. I guess "spirits" have to use physical means to achieve anything.

Now if could place limits on imagination, you would have something.