Triumphant_Loser
Libertarian Egalitarian
Here I think many of us can agree.
Always a good thing to find some common ground. :yes:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Here I think many of us can agree.
So...back to topic.
I still have seen nothing to take down what I believe of Genesis.
Chapter Two is a telling of selection and manipulation.
The terms indicate methods and means far beyond the understanding of the authors.
But we know such things can happen.
I still object to the scientific impossibility that plants and vegetation can be created before the sun, as the Genesis account states, and yet somehow survive at temperatures of around -450 degrees Fahrenheit. (Which would probably be around how cold Earth's atmosphere would be if there were no sun.) They would literally freeze the moment they were created.
Yes, there is something special about the name JESUS--it means Saviour.
Why are you taking it so literal. Obviously God kept them warm over night, and then in the morning made the Sun and stars... and black holes, supernovas, asteroids and comets, all to make it appear that we are nothing but an insignificant bleep on the cosmic radar screen. But no, we are the most important thing in the universe. He created it all for us. His majesty is every where. Like in the stars exploding in space and things getting sucked into some mysterious void. So silly Triumphant Loser, just because there was no Sun doesn't mean it was cold. God's love would have been sufficient to keep them warm. After all, it was just one night.I still object to the scientific impossibility that plants and vegetation can be created before the sun, as the Genesis account states, and yet somehow survive at temperatures of around -450 degrees Fahrenheit. (Which would probably be around how cold Earth's atmosphere would be if there were no sun.) They would literally freeze the moment they were created.
When did Christians first start calling Jesus, Jesus? What was wrong with his Hebrew name? Or, whatever Jesus is in Greek? Why aren't those names special?Yes, there is something special about the name JESUS--it means Saviour.
Always a good thing to find some common ground. :yes:
I still object to the scientific impossibility that plants and vegetation can be created before the sun, as the Genesis account states, and yet somehow survive at temperatures of around -450 degrees Fahrenheit. (Which would probably be around how cold Earth's atmosphere would be if there were no sun.) They would literally freeze the moment they were created.
Doctors are your savior. All through the education system you hate
They will save your life with the science you hate.
I have a healthy respect for education and science---.
---rightly understood.
When did Christians first start calling Jesus, Jesus? What was wrong with his Hebrew name? Or, whatever Jesus is in Greek? Why aren't those names special?
You factually hate science and education and trash it when ever you can.
Which is the problem. You do not understand it. YOU pervert it.
In contrast to the false assumption/opinions you keep projecting to me, I have a healthy respect for education and science---rightly understood.
All you have to do for me to believe as you(in regards to evolution), IS for you to produce just one of the earth's elements FROM NOTHING(none of the existing ones). Next, Produce "LIFE" from that material.
The only advancing that Scientist have done in those areas is in the "TIME" for their "Theories" to have occurred.
What language is "Jesus Christ"? All I'm asking is why don't you use the Hebrew word or the Greek word? Aren't they more likely to be the real word that God intended?Originally Posted by sincerly View Post
Yes, there is something special about the name JESUS--it means Saviour.
Jesus was named long before there was a follower of Jesus Christ and they were called "Christians".
A rose by any other name is still a rose.
I mentioned the thing about no rain, but a mist, in Genesis 2. What is your Bible-based scientific view of rain or no rain before the flood? I read this in Answers in Genesis:Originally Posted by sincerly View Post
I have a healthy respect for education and science---rightly understood.
It makes it sound like Christians change their unchanging Biblical view sometimes. That can't right, because then Christians might someday have to admit things like the Earth going around the Sun, or, God forbid, something like evolution being true.The answer is obvious. Yes, it did! No, it didnt! Wait, which answer is right, or is a third option possible?
Scripture says tantalizingly little about climate conditions before the Flood. Based on a few indirect verses, early creationists speculated that a vapor canopy covered the earth until the first rain fell during the Flood. In time, this view became dogma for some Christians. Later, when mathematical modeling failed to support the canopy theory, many creationists abandoned the idea of a canopy and no-rain-before-the-Flood. In time, the belief that it rained before the Flood became a new dogma. In such cases, how should a Bible believer respond?
...Was there rain before the Genesis Flood? I dont believe there was, at least near the Garden of Eden. But only time will tell if modeling efforts are successful in supporting a canopy prior to the Flood. If the modeling is not successful, then rain probably fell before the Flood, at least far from the Garden of Eden. Whatever explanation is true, the Bibles accuracy is not in question. Any combination of these models would be consistent with the biblical account, or perhaps an alternative set of conditions, which we have not yet discovered, drove the pre-Flood climate.
You FLAT deny, and attack what is taught in EVERY credibe school across the whole world.
Not just one obscure school, ALL of them.
Doesnt that make you an educational terrorist?
What language is "Jesus Christ"? All I'm asking is why don't you use the Hebrew word or the Greek word? Aren't they more likely to be the real word that God intended?
There are many schools/learning institutions which do not teach evolution as a fact
.
My logic tells me
.
Shalom outhouse, maybe you need to bring in one of your "experts" to respond for you. Blessings in The Name, ImAHebrew.Shalom outhouse, Yeshua BELIEVED Moses existed, and that he (Moses) even WROTE about His (Yeshua's) future death, burial, and 3rd day resurrection that He would fulfill:
Outhouse, why do you continue to foolishly deny what the historical Moses wrote in Numbers 19 concerning the suffering, death, burial, and 3rd day resurrection of Yeshua? Will your mind ever be "opened" to understand what is WRITTEN by Moses? Blessings in The Name, ImAHebrew.