Actually, you hit the nail on the head - "recreationally". That is a pretty good term, perhaps not perfect however.
I will not deny, perhaps due to DNA after eons of ancestors who drank fermented fruit, rice, potatos, et all, after all this was perhaps more safe than other things and could be stored for long periods of time, some have an ability to drink in reason with no effect and "thanks" to their ancestors as it was an ability "inherited" if you will, dead ender drunks probably died before they could afford to reproduce and thus those who had the ability lived longer and populated the gene pool more often.
But it seems alcoholism itself can be inherited. So I don't know what to say to those who have that DNA other than alcohol must be avoided.
Now let us take cannabis - some advanced yogis and renunciates can and do use it, not for "recreation", but for meditation or religious purpose. But this is not for the average idiot, such savants have advanced training, teaching, control - they know what they are doing.
There are examples in alcohol as well, but the same applies. You cannot just make up your own excuses, nor some "religion" out of thin air. You need the teaching from those who handed it down, training if you will, teaching, the method.
Driving a car can be dangerous. Only those trained how to drive a car should drive a car. Only those trained in the proper use, should drink as part of a meditation or "practice".
So recreational use, or what I would term "untrained use", is the problem. And the teacher(s) must come from an authorized disciplic succession. However, there are very few - probably none - such teachers in the West.