moorea944
Well-Known Member
My search for the truth about Existence has come to this question?
Any ideas?
Two things.......
1. God doesnt have to prove anything to you.
2. Who are you to demand something from our Creator?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
My search for the truth about Existence has come to this question?
Any ideas?
Someone who has no reason to think 'our Creator' was anything but physics.Two things.......
1. God doesnt have to prove anything to you.
2. Who are you to demand something from our Creator?
You exist. What else to you need?
Why does it matter? What will change if you do discover whether or not He exists?
That’s the thing your getting wrong! What makes you think all this is a program? Or anything related to that! God does not work with Programs..like I said! God works through MATTER..matter is the connecting through particles in which we humans are also made of and uses it in communicating(where emotions are connecting to its experiencing)..this is how connections work through its vibration in its space..and all that stuff! This is ‘The God’ I am referring to..for in many Human minds are too selfish to THINK outside of their knowledge..God is not based on you and your knowledge..God is The All Knowing..meaning God is the Answer..and us Humans are living in it..but THAN now MANY become questions in it ..and here you think you know better than no God!.based on what? Your knowledge from science? The only thing that stands between you and the unknown is science! Science IS MAN-MADE answers for their own questions, and noTHING more than that..and just like humans they make a lot of mistakes in order to get their answers..and as of yet some are finding..still wrong in its place, or even worse! They good at hiding truths(meaning science SPOILS HUMANS[clinching])..but we human beings do not know that..do they?but hey! that is my opinion so it doesn’t matter what I say!Why on earth would an omniscient God, who's known from back before [he] made the universe exactly who would believe, worship, pray to [him], give two hoots whether anyone worshiped [him] or not? If you write a program that prints 'Workman is the greatest!' or I write a program that prints 'Blü 2 is the greatest!', you or I might be pleased that the program works, but hearing a message you or I predetermined is hardly cause for you or me to be chuffed, is it?
Your right! I’ve missed a word ‘experiencing’.You think? I don't. Our emotions are our brain's reactions to our body's biochemicals, which the brain is very largely responsible for calling up. The science is quite clear, based on evidence and repeatable experiment. And if God is omniscient, then as I said, [he] knew everything you or I will ever think, say, do (and why) before [he] made the universe. We can never do anything even an atom's-width, even a Planck time, different to what [he] perfectly foresaw 14 bn years ago.
Yes, but in this case God would bypass evolution and instead DIY, which assumes [he] has some special affection or use for humans, whereas as you know, evolution does not. With overpopulation, Malthus goes hand in hand with evolution too.I have given this supposed God the benefit of the doubt in suggesting that He has interfered in the evolutionary process by creating genetically distinct brand of humans known as atheists so as to slow down the population explosion, but there is no evidence that there is a God who has directed this.
I dare say we won't mourn our species as such nearly as much as we'll mourn the idea of our personal descendants.If humans did go extinct why should we mourn that:
Some religions are tearers-apart; separateness and elite notions are almost the hallmark of the right. But quite a few of the others are ecumenical, and as atheism becomes more prevalent, which is the way it's trending at present, I dare say they'll get more so. If nonbelief were more organized, perhaps constructive conversations between the two outlooks would be easier to bring about; but I'm not certain of that happening on any large scale.something else will most likely take its place as another species, in the same way that no one mourns the extinction of Homo erectus of Homo habilis. The most important thing for us humans is to live peacefully in cooperation with other human beings and create comfort and joy in the way we live our lives. This cannot be achieved with established religions in place tearing humanity apart with their diverse beliefs and practices.
Once God is omnipotent and omniscient, there's no other possibility. I think [he]'s also perfect, so, as I said, there never was a time when God didn't perfectly know everything you'll ever think, do or say, and exactly why you'll think, do or say it. Hence you can never think do or say anything except exactly what God has always known you would. In the alternative, God is NOT omnipotent, omniscient or perfect.What makes you think all this is a program?
Emotions work through our own hormones, our own biochemistry, as triggered by the brain. I can support that statement with enormous amounts of evidence ─ the effects and roles of testosterone or adrenaline and many more are well known. I'm not aware of any evidence supporting what you claim.God works through MATTER .. matter is the connecting through particles(which we humans also are made of and uses for communicating (where emotions are connecting to its experiencing)..this is how connections work through its vibration in its space..and all that stuff!
Your God differs from many other versions of God. That huge range of variation is telling evidence that God exists only as a concept in an individual brain, and has no objective existence, no?This is ‘The God’ I am referring to..for in many Human minds are too selfish to THINK outside of their knowledge..God is not based on you and your knowledge..God is The All Knowing..
I thought the answer was 42. What is the question to which your particular version of God is the answer?meaning God is the Answer..
there never was a time when God didn't perfectly know everything you'll ever think, do or say, and exactly why you'll think, do or say it.
In the alternative, God is NOT omnipotent, omniscient or perfect.
and what exactly are you trying to prove? I’m saying the body is reacting to its experiencing and expresses to the mind of what has been felt..the mind cannot deny its emotion..so what are you trying to prove wrong? we’ll just keep it at that! I have no need of your evidence..having evidence does not matter for me they do not mean anything..and for my so called evidence your requesting..you may not be aware of your own but I am, I don’t need science to explain me TO ME..I am my own Body TO LEARN. you can believe in what you LIKE, but myself I believe that LOVE matters most!. And I’ve always followed through this mind set of..there is not such thing being LIKE is right, But only a matter of being wronged! I have my own faith in God and that’s where my sources come from.Emotions work through our own hormones, our own biochemistry, as triggered by the brain. I can support that statement with enormous amounts of evidence ─ the effects and roles of testosterone or adrenaline and many more are well known. I'm not aware of any evidence supporting what you claim.
Concept? yes!..if you think about it’s the mind that is in control of everything..It is the power of thought! That will access one more control of 10% of the mind.Your God differs from many other versions of God. That huge range of variation is telling evidence that God exists only as a concept in an individual brain, and has no objective existence, no?
Its answer can be in many different forms depending on the formula and its equation. And God is to answer it ‘The Solution’..in all directions, movements, timing..etc..I thought the answer was 42. What is the question to which your particular version of God is the answer?
Without time, change is impossible, so thought and all other processes are impossible. The only thing you have without time (assuming you can be said to have anything) is perfect stasis.First of all...before there was TIME, there was PERFECT!
An old theological question: how can imperfection arise from perfection?And before Time started God knew of how all are to think, do and say..for God recognises it was not PERFECT.
With all due respect, don't be silly.Time was casted because of our Sinning..
But we're working on it. What has God done lately?Your getting confused in who’s Perfect..God is perfect..it was us humans that weren’t perfect!..
Unfortunately I have no idea what a real god is, and no one seems able to tell me, so I can't answer your question. (Imaginary gods, no sweat, of course, one or more for each imagination. Real gods, no one finds, knows, speaks of, describes them ─ not a peep.)Do you believe in GOD?
I'm saying that the brain is an evolved physical object that at present we partially understand. So far there's nothing to suggest any non-physical element is involved ─ assuming any useful meaning can be attached to the words 'non-physical' in this context.and what exactly are you trying to prove?
I didn't ask you what the answer was ─ you'd already said it was God.Its answer can be in many different forms depending on the formula and its equation.
1. No God does not have to prove anything to me, but He must not expect devotional reverences from me and singing songs of praises for the good fortune that I have.Two things.......
1. God doesnt have to prove anything to you.
2. Who are you to demand something from our Creator?
Yes, but in this case God would bypass evolution and instead DIY, which assumes [he] has some special affection or use for humans, whereas as you know, evolution does not. With overpopulation, Malthus goes hand in hand with evolution too.
We care for our children and grandchildren as a human trait: that is all that one needs to know in evolutionary terms.I dare say we won't mourn our species as such nearly as much as we'll mourn the idea of our personal descendants.
I agree.Some religions are tearers-apart; separateness and elite notions are almost the hallmark of the right. But quite a few of the others are ecumenical, and as atheism becomes more prevalent, which is the way it's trending at present, I dare say they'll get more so. If nonbelief were more organized, perhaps constructive conversations between the two outlooks would be easier to bring about; but I'm not certain of that happening on any large scale.
He? Are you sure it is a He?I believe He already has.
The way he phrased it seems a bit odd to me, but personally, I see absolutely nothing wrong with with establishing a standard of evidence that a god-claim would need to meet in order to be reasonably believable, then not believing in that god unless the standard is met.Two things.......
1. God doesnt have to prove anything to you.
2. Who are you to demand something from our Creator?