to a point, soul and spirit are one ,,,,,,,to a point. the spirit is little more than bio-chemical electricity .when that is gone the body or soul is known to be dead. every living animal has the same bio-chemical electrical force .as one dies so does the others.
Cataway, think of a DEVICE, a SYSTEM, as the SOUL / PERSON that is software directing hardware.
Think of the SPIRIT as the computer programme of the device… the SOFTWARE that instructs the hardware of the device how to function and what to do.
Think of the BODY as the hardware, thd MACHINERY, that can do nothing except what the software instructs it to do.
The hardware / machinery is created … it’s an UNLIVING DEVICE… The DEVICE exists but is nonfunctional because there is no SOFTWARE to animate it. Then when the software programme is put into the device, the machinery is ENLIVENED and the device becomes a LIVING DEVICE… an ANIMATED Soul… a LIVING SOUL.
Now here is the controversy that pervades the understanding - which it appears is the struggling point of the understanding:
- The software cannot be KILLED (off) because of is just bits and bytes. It’s stored in a copy outside the machinery hardware
- The hardware CAN be killed!!! Damaged so it no longer can be operated by the software within it. The software ‘evaporates’ from the machinery hardware and the machinery is useless and ‘decays to rust and dust
- The Device STILL EXISTS as a blueprint so IT IS NOT KILLED
- But if the SOFTWARE is DESTROYED from its stored position then there can be no way to resuscitate the system … there can be no way to reanimate the hardware - the hardware decays to rust and dust - therefore THE WHOLE DEVICE is thence DESTROYED because BOTH software and hardware are destroyed
‘Do not fear them who can KILL the machine but cannot kill the Software; Fear Him who can DESTROY both The Device and the Software in fire’.
Note the difference between ‘KILL’ and ‘DESTROY’. What can or cannot be DESTROYED.
Kill is linked to Die / DEAD. A DEAD (Killed) person is one in whom the spirit is made to be removed from the body by way of it not able to communicate with the body it was in and the external stimuli it receives through the senses in the body. As a result the body, which cannot by itself make sense of itself and its environment, decays for want of sustenance. The spirit is resting with God like software on the ‘software shelf’ awaiting a renewed body to be put into.
As long the SOFTWARE / SPIRIT exists the DEVICE / PERSON / SOUL exists. And there is the great error in the understanding:
- Because the SOUL exists BECAUSE the SPIRIT exists, many believe that the SOUL IS THE SPIRIT…
- Because the Soul exists AND ITS SPIRIT exists, many think the Soul IS ANOTHER part of…. (Another part of what??? The PERSON??)
No! It is simply the DESPERATION to CLAIM there are three parts to a human being because Man is image of God and TRINITY says there are three PERSONS in / as God… so man must… also be three parts.
This wrongful aspect only arises AFTER the question was asked:
- ‘If man is image of God - and God is three - how is it man is only TWO PARTS: Body and Spirit?’
Thus, the great trinitarian deceit machine went into overdrive and came up with the solution that:
- Man is three parts: Soul / Spirit / Body
But they haven’t worked out what ‘SOUL’ is in relation to ‘Spirit’… and you see the GREEK for Soul is effectively the SAME AS the HEBREW for the ‘Soul’.
And, in Latin, some 1100 years after the Jesus’ birth, the term ‘PERSON’ came into use as a replacement for ‘SOUL’. But we still use remnants of ‘Soul’, meaning ‘Person’ in everyday usage:
- ‘I searched the burning building and there wasn’t a Soul left in there’ : ‘There was no PERSON (PEOPLE) in there!’
- ‘Oh my soul…’ : ‘Oh ME…’
It gets really tedious reading clearly wrongful ideology from those desperate to maintain their belief. I wonder how they hurt their ‘image of God’ humanity when they claim against the godliness that is in that image of God: Truth and Righteousness, and the Love of such!? It becomes simply a game of ‘how deceitful can I be… I don’t want to admit my understanding is false so I’ll just write a load of nonsense and hope to frustrate the opposition till THEY make an error and I can seize on it and pound them to dust by forever pushing it back in their face…’You made an error before.. why should we believe you again??’