Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
They don't happen by way of divine intervention.
I believe the true God gives his intelligent creatures the gift of free will. He does not make us robots, unable to do what we choose. So the correct question would be:If God is willing and able to prevent evil, God would prevent the wicked rebels.
So let's revise the question:
Is God willing to prevent wicked rebels, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh wicked rebels?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
They don't happen by way of divine intervention.
I believe that as people created by God, we are accountable to him for what we do. Christians are not authorized to harm anyone. (Matthew 5:43-45) The nation of Israel was authorized to wage war against God's enemies. They themselves came under God's judgment when they turned to worshipping false gods.The bible actually does talk about killing those who worship other gods.
Oh this is a new topic.
He is able to prevent evil as much as anything else, but does not desire to, not out of malevolence, but because it serves a positive purpose. It punishes the wicked and returns the righteous to G-d. Rather, if we would not desire to do wicked things, we would not need evil. Alternatively, if we would repent before the whip strikes, there'd be no need for the whip.
Theoretically, G-d could take away the desire to do wicked, but its that desire to be wicked that we need to overcome that is what G-d uses to test us so that He can reward us. So although evil is temporarily uncomfortable, in the long term, it has positive benefit and is thus good.
I was thinking about that, but I think he's talking about phenomena rather than free will.As to our inclination -
רבי נחמן בר שמואל בר נחמן בשם רב שמואל בר נחמן אמר הנה טוב מאד זה יצר טוב והנה טוב מאד זה יצר רע, כי יצר הרע טוב מאד, אתמהא, אלא שאלולי יצר הרע לא בנה אדם בית ולא נשא אשה, ולא הוליד ולאו נשא ונתן
Then why do christians think maricles come from god?
I don't believe in miracles either. I was just curious.I can't speak for other people, just myself.
I do not believe in miracles or divine intervention (that is a part of deism). If God gave us free will (which is my belief) then we make our own choices and suffer the consequences, whether they are good or bad. If God intervened, then it would no longer be free will. I can't imagine a creator deity giving us life, but then treating us like a bunch of automatons that are subject to Its whims/mood swings/pride/jealousy. Are we nothing more than ants on an anthill, waiting to see if God is going to use a magnifying glass on us in an attempt to burn us with the sun's rays, because It has nothing better to do? The universe is a vast place, and I doubt God is overly concerned what one, tiny, mud ball of a planet has going on.
I have yet to see or hear about a true, divine miracle. Don't bother linking any stories as I have probably read them. I remain skeptical.
~~~
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
-Epicurus
~~~
For those that subscribe to such rhetoric and think it warrants discussion, then please discuss this thing called evil. Don't be shy.
I have a hard time wrapping my head around the idea that just because an entity of some sort (lightning, the sun, the wind, Athena, etc.) is not the ultimate, maximum, universal, etc., it should not be granted any acknowledgment, respect, honor, etc....I guess I no longer see things as either/or along that continuum...there are lots of things that are bigger/more powerful/awesome/etc., than me, and if someone wants to classify them as deities I don't see a problem...Sure they aren't the ultimate; so what?Well, it'd certainly be helpful to have an operational definition of "evil." Not that this would help me address the OP, though. The moment I ran into the word "God" my brain went "what?" and then when it hit the word "evil" it went "really?" - then made its way to "oh... another one of these problem of evil arguments that doesn't apply to my theology. Okay."
I believe the true God gives his intelligent creatures the gift of free will. He does not make us robots, unable to do what we choose. So the correct question would be:
Is God able but not willing to create robots that cannot serve him out of love? Yes, because God is a loving Father, not a puppet master.
Well, it'd certainly be helpful to have an operational definition of "evil." Not that this would help me address the OP, though. The moment I ran into the word "God" my brain went "what?" and then when it hit the word "evil" it went "really?" - then made its way to "oh... another one of these problem of evil arguments that doesn't apply to my theology. Okay."
~~~
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
-Epicurus
~~~
~~~
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
-Epicurus
~~~
God is never responsible for evil, IMO,
This means God gave us the ability to choose the course we will follow