Gods personal name

[kjw47]

Here are some facts few probably know. They are hidden from most that claim to be those that serve Jesus.

In the OT, Gods personal name was removed( making them altered versions) In nearly 6800 spots. Every spot where- GOD or LORD all capitols. Wicked removed it, they had no right. God inspired his name there.
As well They have found very old fragments of the Greek septuagent(NT) The ones who read them stated--We have proof Gods personal name is in the NT and used by the early christians.
That goes along with Jesus who at John 17:6- teaches that name to his followers, At John 17:26- Promises to keep on making that name known. Along with another prayer to his Father from Jesus at John 12:28--Father, glorify your name. Therefore a voice came out of heaven i both glorified it and will glorify it again.

This proves The Father and the son want that name known and used.
Yet the religions that keep that name out, condemned the ones who put it back-They said the name doesnt belong in the Nt even though there is proof. Proving they are doing the opposite of the Fathers will and what Jesus wants. Jesus lives to do the Fathers will as does every true follower-Matthew 7:21-Jesus is clear-Those living now to do his Fathers will, get to enter his kingdom( be saved)-- so by those religions doing the opposite of the Fathers will have closed up Gods kingdom to all that listen to them=2Corinthians 11:12-15--Run from them.

 

[Rival]

It wasn't removed. You seem ignorant of the reason for not saying the name.

 

[danieldemol]

Here are some facts few probably know. They are hidden from most that claim to be those that serve Jesus.

In the OT, Gods personal name was removed( making them altered versions) In nearly 6800 spots. Every spot where- GOD or LORD all capitols. Wicked removed it, they had no right. God inspired his name there.
As well They have found very old fragments of the Greek septuagent(NT) The ones who read them stated--We have proof Gods personal name is in the NT and used by the early christians.
That goes along with Jesus who at John 17:6- teaches that name to his followers, At John 17:26- Promises to keep on making that name known. Along with another prayer to his Father from Jesus at John 12:28--Father, glorify your name. Therefore a voice came out of heaven i both glorified it and will glorify it again.

This proves The Father and the son want that name known and used.
Yet the religions that keep that name out, condemned the ones who put it back-They said the name doesnt belong in the Nt even though there is proof. Proving they are doing the opposite of the Fathers will and what Jesus wants. Jesus lives to do the Fathers will as does every true follower-Matthew 7:21-Jesus is clear-Those living now to do his Fathers will, get to enter his kingdom( be saved)-- so by those religions doing the opposite of the Fathers will have closed up Gods kingdom to all that listen to them=2Corinthians 11:12-15--Run from them.

Personally I have found running from all religions including Jehovah's Witnesses to be more truthful.

I think if there is salvation then if God is loving logically salvation would be for all since our deeds seem to stem from defects in brain chemistry and or structure, and defective environmental influences, neither of which we have complete control over.

So why would God blame us for that which is out of our control?

In my opinion.

 

[Colt]

Every fringe sect sells some special angle to followers that only they have. They claim unique insight that only they can see, things "hidden" from everyone else.

 

[Fool]

Here are some facts few probably know. They are hidden from most that claim to be those that serve Jesus.

In the OT, Gods personal name was removed( making them altered versions) In nearly 6800 spots. Every spot where- GOD or LORD all capitols. Wicked removed it, they had no right. God inspired his name there.
As well They have found very old fragments of the Greek septuagent(NT) The ones who read them stated--We have proof Gods personal name is in the NT and used by the early christians.
That goes along with Jesus who at John 17:6- teaches that name to his followers, At John 17:26- Promises to keep on making that name known. Along with another prayer to his Father from Jesus at John 12:28--Father, glorify your name. Therefore a voice came out of heaven i both glorified it and will glorify it again.

This proves The Father and the son want that name known and used.
Yet the religions that keep that name out, condemned the ones who put it back-They said the name doesnt belong in the Nt even though there is proof. Proving they are doing the opposite of the Fathers will and what Jesus wants. Jesus lives to do the Fathers will as does every true follower-Matthew 7:21-Jesus is clear-Those living now to do his Fathers will, get to enter his kingdom( be saved)-- so by those religions doing the opposite of the Fathers will have closed up Gods kingdom to all that listen to them=2Corinthians 11:12-15--Run from them.

the name shall not be taken in vain, or exclusive to self, for it is the name of the ALL in all.


ahmi yat ahmi

 

[kjw47]

Personally I have found running from all religions including Jehovah's Witnesses to be more truthful.

I think if there is salvation then if God is loving logically salvation would be for all since our deeds seem to stem from defects in brain chemistry and or structure, and defective environmental influences, neither of which we have complete control over.

So why would God blame us for that which is out of our control?

In my opinion.

The teachings of Jesus is the key. 99% of all religion claiming to be christian do not listen to him. They teach dogma taught in the schools of men.
I haveattended different ones, i learnedabout them, i learned about the Jw,s and i studied Jesus teachings carefully. There is no doubt in all creation, Jesus teachings back the Jw,s as well as true God worship history does as well.

 

[danieldemol]

The teachings of Jesus is the key. 99% of all religion claiming to be christian do not listen to him. They teach dogma taught in the schools of men.

Jesus is just a man. His teachings are the teachings of men.

Fortunately for the modern man we have gained much in collective knowledge and experience since His time.

In my opinion.

 

[kjw47]

the name shall not be taken in vain, or exclusive to self, for it is the name of the ALL in all.


ahmi yat ahmi

Exactly it should not be taken in vain but God and his son want it used by the true followers. Some teachers try to say that saying-Jesus Christ in anger or G dam it is taking it in vain. The biggest part of taking it in vain is by telling others i am a servant of God, then doing wicked acts in front of them. Proving that you are not his servant.

 

[kjw47]

Jesus is just a man. His teachings are the teachings of men.

Fortunately for the modern man we have gained much in collective knowledge and experience since His time.

In my opinion.

Men cannot bring the dead back to life unless Gods power goes through him-Acts 2:22--same with Moses he was just a man but God parted the red sea through him. He couldnt do it without God being with him.

 

[danieldemol]

Men cannot bring the dead back to life unless Gods power goes through him-Acts 2:22--same with Moses he was just a man but God parted the red sea through him. He couldnt do it without God being with him.

There is no evidence Jesus bought the physically dead to life and the evidence suggests Moses is mythological.

In my opinion.

 

[kjw47]

There is no evidence Jesus bought the physically dead to life and the evidence suggests Moses is mythological.

In my opinion.

Moses wrote many of the books in the OT.
The reason Israel and Rome had no written things about Jesus. They would have to admit they killed Gods son.

 

[danieldemol]

Moses wrote many of the books in the OT.

First you would have to establish that Moses existed, and as far as I know it is only non-historical tradition which says Moses wrote any of the OT.

In my opinion.

 

[lukethethird]

Gods personal name
Mister.

 

[Lazy Old Devil]

Jehovah's Witnesses aren't even spelling his name right! It should start with an I!
Mind you, I'm basing that entirely on Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.

 

[dybmh]

.

Men cannot bring the dead back to life unless Gods power goes through him-

True but incomplete. Men can also coerce or make a deal with the Angel of Death to revive the dead. But it comes with a terrible price.

 

[Brian2]

Here are some facts few probably know. They are hidden from most that claim to be those that serve Jesus.

In the OT, Gods personal name was removed( making them altered versions) In nearly 6800 spots. Every spot where- GOD or LORD all capitols. Wicked removed it, they had no right. God inspired his name there.
As well They have found very old fragments of the Greek septuagent(NT) The ones who read them stated--We have proof Gods personal name is in the NT and used by the early christians.
That goes along with Jesus who at John 17:6- teaches that name to his followers, At John 17:26- Promises to keep on making that name known. Along with another prayer to his Father from Jesus at John 12:28--Father, glorify your name. Therefore a voice came out of heaven i both glorified it and will glorify it again.

This proves The Father and the son want that name known and used.
Yet the religions that keep that name out, condemned the ones who put it back-They said the name doesnt belong in the Nt even though there is proof. Proving they are doing the opposite of the Fathers will and what Jesus wants. Jesus lives to do the Fathers will as does every true follower-Matthew 7:21-Jesus is clear-Those living now to do his Fathers will, get to enter his kingdom( be saved)-- so by those religions doing the opposite of the Fathers will have closed up Gods kingdom to all that listen to them=2Corinthians 11:12-15--Run from them.

Fragments of the New Testament with YHWH in them does not give anyone the right to put that name into the New Testament where they think it should be and leave it out where they think it should be left out.

 

[Fool]

Exactly it should not be taken in vain but God and his son want it used by the true followers. Some teachers try to say that saying-Jesus Christ in anger or G dam it is taking it in vain. The biggest part of taking it in vain is by telling others i am a servant of God, then doing wicked acts in front of them. Proving that you are not his servant.

jesus, jehovah is not the name. this is the name that those who are baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are to take but not in vain. jesus was given the name by his earthly parents.

it is one name and not multiple names. it is not a human name; like fred, jane, or jesus, or elijah, or isaiah.

philippians 2:9

 

[kjw47]

First you would have to establish that Moses existed, and as far as I know it is only non-historical tradition which says Moses wrote any of the OT.

In my opinion.

Archeologists have dug up many sights proving many teachings in the OT are true.

 

[kjw47]

.

True but incomplete. Men can also coerce or make a deal with the Angel of Death to revive the dead. But it comes with a terrible price.

Not one living can prove they deal with the angel of death.
The drs try to say this one died for 15 minutes, but they werent dead they still live.

 

[kjw47]

Fragments of the New Testament with YHWH in them does not give anyone the right to put that name into the New Testament where they think it should be and leave it out where they think it should be left out.

What matters is that name belongs there. The ones keeping it out have something to hide because they are deceivers, lacking love for Gods will.