sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
the type of prayer, for one thing. Mostly I just pray to God, and God comes as God will.Depends on what,
in the morning for the son
in the evening for his dad.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
the type of prayer, for one thing. Mostly I just pray to God, and God comes as God will.Depends on what,
in the morning for the son
in the evening for his dad.
the type of prayer, for one thing. Mostly I just pray to God, and God comes as God will.
... Mostly I just pray to God, and God comes as God will.
Or...i know you pray to god,but your god is 3 parts,
so when you call god,you call jesus or his father
God is one Being in 3 persons. I can imagine God as a particularity or as a universality, as I need at the time. The others can and do "answer prayer," because they are not "others." They are God.Then why worship something other than God (Jesus(pbuh), Holy Ghost etc.) ? If during prayer you can think of the being as One (God) then you should be able to worship that One being (God) without thinking of the 3 parts ... otherwise, you are only playing with your mind. And as the Bible states that the father is greater than the son, he must have the greater authority to listen and accept your prayers, so why do you need the others ? If the others can't even answer your prayers, how can they save you ? And if you claim that they can, then what is the role of the father - just sitting and watching ?
God is one Being in 3 persons. I can imagine God as a particularity or as a universality, as I need at the time. The others can and do "answer prayer," because they are not "others." They are God.
God is one Being in 3 persons. I can imagine God as a particularity or as a universality, as I need at the time. The others can and do "answer prayer," because they are not "others." They are God.
Worship involves a reciprocity -- a relationship. Jesus evened out the relationship a bit.so when jesus was worshipping the father,he was worshipping himself,
because jesus is part of god (trinity).
I wonder how it is easy to understand that the Trinity isn't a false concept, but still some reject it blindly?i wonder how it is easy to understand that the trinity is a false concept,but
still some accept it blindly.
Finally! 'Bout time!You want to believe that a man born in bethlehem was your god,so good luck,my mission is finished.
Well...Then why did Jesus(pbuh) pray to the Father and preferred the Father's will over his own will as stated above? It clearly shows a higher degree of authority of one over the other.
You seem to assume a lot of authority for the Bible that just isn't there.Also, as you can see the Bible asks you to pray to the Father (not all 3). Does the Bible anywhere state that you should pray to Jesus unambiguously ? If you are supposed to pray to Jesus, I would imagine that the Bible would state that clearly. If it doesn't state that, Jesus must not have the authority to listen to/answer your prayers. And if that is the case, Jesus can't save you either - only the Father(who is the God Almighty) can.
Well...
Jesus was fully human, after all.
You seem to assume a lot of authority for the Bible that just isn't there.
Should it?I asked a simple question : Does the Bible anywhere state that you should pray to Jesus unambiguously ?
Jesus' teachings are from a human POV. Since Jesus, as a fully human being, prayed to the Father, so should we. But Jesus is also ascended now. Therefore, being God, it's OK to pray to Jesus, too.My understanding is that it doesn't, instead, it asks you to pray to the Father as I have shown you from some biblical statements. If I am wrong I'll be happy to accept it on this point, if you can show me from the Bible.
I don't know. That's part of the mystery. If we understood it, we'd be fully Divine.And how can he be fully human and fully God at the same time ?
God.If he was fully human, who was running the show while he was on earth?
Should it?
Jesus' teachings are from a human POV. Since Jesus, as a fully human being, prayed to the Father, so should we. But Jesus is also ascended now. Therefore, being God, it's OK to pray to Jesus, too.
I don't know. That's part of the mystery. If we understood it, we'd be fully Divine.
Why?If that is the case, Jesus should have at least mentioned once that once he ascends back to heaven that you can pray to him.
What is this compulsion you feel to twist Xy into a Biblical religion. It isn't. The Bible is part of the Tradition of the religion, but the religion isn't based upon it. In fact, there were no Greek texts until years after Jesus was gone.Is there any biblical verse that states that ? Or does it always say to pray to the Father ?
So? Should the religion not be "man made?" The religion is there for humanity's sake, not God's.it is as if he didn't complete his teaching and also then the praying to Jesus part is man made.
I didn't ignore it -- you just don't get it. God was running the show. I believe I said that. Don't you think that God is everywhere? God wasn't "just on earth."You ignored this part. If he was fully human, who was running the show while he was on earth
No, I consider God to be One. God doesn't have "parts."(cause you consider God to be 3 parts)?
If God is One, how can God be "incomplete?"In essence an incomplete God was running the show ?
Yup.And fully human.
You ignored this part. If he was fully human, who was running the show while he was on earth (as you know 1 of the 3 was on earth) ? So only 2 of the 3 part of God was running the show (cause you consider God to be 3 parts)? In essence an incomplete God was running the show ?
God's humanity died -- not God's Divinity.God when he decided to die because he love us and want to forgive our sins and
our bad deeds,he programmed the universe to work for 3 days automatically while
he was absent (killing himself),then after the sacrifice and the pains he returned
back to his work,that make sense and easy to understand
It is a spurious doctrine invented in the 2nd century that none of the Disciples or earliest Church Fathers would have had any idea about that involves distorted use and abuse of the grammar of the texts and interpolated verses like 1 John 5:7, and reliant on invented grammar concepts like "Colwell's rule", it is Polytheistic to Orthodox Jews (and rightfully so), and is otherwise an abomination, and in most respects, most Trinitarians use what is actually Modalistic/Sabellian terms to define their belief in what is really just a form of Modalism.
The general concensus of the doctrine is that it is impossible for the human mind to understand, therefore basically dubbing it illogical. It also involves completely rewriting concepts like "Monotheism" and doing away with the idea that the Israelites believed in beings called "gods", and ignoring the anarthrous use of the word "Theos" which means "a god", in both the gospels as well as "Church Father" writings like that of Iraneus and Origen where it is clear that they meant to say "a god" but the Trinitaiian translators render it as "God" as if such grammar does not matter. Without the Trinity, 99% of all so-called "Christian" "churches" would lose their spinal cord and crumble apart. Thus, it is in their vested interest to support this ancient distortion of the scripture. It should also be in the interest of all those against Western so-called "Christianity" to recognize this.
There, explained.
God's humanity died -- not God's Divinity.
God's humanity died -- not God's Divinity.