Nice try.
The fact of the matter is that I am currently on both sides of this particular fence.
I am currently paying child support and I am supposed to be receiving child support.
You keep going on about it not being fair.
I have asked you what you base it on.
you have thus far flat out refused to explain how it is unfair.
you seem to be so concerned with the paying of child support that you seem to be completely ignoring the fact that the other party is actually raising the child.
Instead, you keep claiming that because the custodial party COULD give up their responsibility that the non-custodial parent SHOULD be released from their responsibility.
And you are claiming to be arguing over the "fairness" of it all?
It's the kind of rhetoric displayed by deadbeat parents, men and women, who are obligated to pay child support. What I'm seeing in the arguments about men's rights to be free from paying child support is that there should be no such thing as deadbeat dads, and that men relinquishing their obligation to child support is exactly the same as a woman's bodily right to terminate a pregnancy.
"So, if she's not a murderer when she terminates a pregnancy, then I shouldn't be a deadbeat dad if I refuse to pay child support for a child *I* didn't want. If she can't be demonized for killing a child, then I shouldn't be demonized for running away from that child....see?"
The mental gymnastics to justify a comparison is truly remarkable, isn't it?