Trailblazer
Veteran Member
I fully agree.A greater purpose is to make life worthwhile for others. And the reciprocity of doing so makes life better for self. That's the ideal.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I fully agree.A greater purpose is to make life worthwhile for others. And the reciprocity of doing so makes life better for self. That's the ideal.
There's a good and valuable distinction.As in - "Did you have a happy life?"
It seems to be ambiguous. Sorry. I made an additional notation in the OP.Fair enough, then I suppose, though I still feel fulfilment is distinct from happiness.
It is eternal. It is called eternal life.But if life were eternal then that would be the greatest purpose.
This is happiness in the sense of contentedness, or fulfillment.
"Are you happy in life?" is not asking if you are always merry. It is asking if your life is, on balance, a fulfilling one.
Many people have argued that a long life would be grand, but an eternal life would be a horror. I tend to agree. A few hundred years would be nice.Forever true love is the hardest to live. Goodbye sucks. But if life were eternal then that would be the greatest purpose.
It is eternal. It is called eternal life.
So the goal is just survival of the species even if the species is not fulfilling any purpose above personal happiness?Happiness is not the goal in my book. To me the goal is continuing the species, and that includes cleaning up the mess so the species can thrive
That all depends upon what that life is like. We cannot know that on this side of the divide.but an eternal life would be a horror.
So the goal is just survival of the species even if the species is not fulfilling any purpose above personal happiness?
Personal happiness is not the goal in my book either.
Confirmation is not what makes it so.... It is either so or it is not so...Oh, as far as i know, no one has ever confirmed that so how can you honestly say "it is...". Surely you mean "you believe it is..."
I can go along with that because it makes logical sense to me.I think so, without it humanity would be a line in a history book
How does being more than a line constitute a greater purpose? I understand that it is a purpose. But greater?I think so, without it humanity would be a line in a history book
We can't know much on this side of the divideThat all depends upon what that life is like. We cannot know that on this side of the divide.
Confirmation is not what makes it so.... It is either so or it is not so...
I believe and I know it is so. How I know is not something most people can understand, especially atheists.
How does being more than a line constitute a greater purpose? I understand that it is a purpose. But greater?
Sometimes I think I would like to know, but Baha'u'llah explained why we are not allowed to know.....We can't know much on this side of the divide
And yet somehow I prefer it that way.
I don't buy that there is or could be an "ultimate" purpose. But setting that aside...More than greater, the ultimate purpose of life.
Think about what i wrote, who would be there to read the book. How would the book exist in the first place if there were none to write it
Is there a greater purpose than personal happiness? What is that purpose?
I typed it in bigger letters.And how is it greater?
"Are you happy in life?" is not asking if you are always merry. It is asking if your life is, on balance, a fulfilling one.