To continue the species.
Without out it there would be no one to be happy
Are you sure?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
To continue the species.
Without out it there would be no one to be happy
I love early BBC budgeting constraints.This belongs here....
All knowledge is not based upon facts we can prove. I cannot prove what I know is the truth so it is not a fact, in the sense of definition #1 below. However, I can know according to definition #2 below.So you dont know but say you do because...
then we are all junkies then.Happiness is just a chemical reaction.
We are. Happiness, love, joy, excitement, anger, sex, etc. all cause dopamine to be released in our brain.then we are all junkies then.
hopeless addicts to some substance we cook up in our glandular labs
breaking bad on a whole new level
hmmmmm.
yes, I am hip to that, tragically so,We are. Happiness, love, joy, excitement, anger, sex, etc. all cause dopamine to be released in our brain.
What should compel me to I consider a purpose that has nothing to do with us to be greater. Or existent?
Not only a slavery not a greater purpose, but it's among the lowest among the reviled purposes.Because I accepted that we don't own the universe, but its the universe that owns us.
Is there a greater purpose than personal happiness? What is that purpose? And how is it greater?
This is happiness in the sense of contentedness, or fulfillment.
"Are you happy in life?" is not asking if you are always merry. It is asking if your life is, on balance, a fulfilling one.
No. there's no greater purpose than personal happiness in the sense of contentedness, or fulfilment.Is there a greater purpose than personal happiness? What is that purpose? And how is it greater? This is happiness in the sense of contentedness, or fulfillment.
It is clearing a doubt."Are you happy in life?" is not asking if you are always merry. It is asking if your life is, on balance, a fulfilling one.
Animals also do the same.To continue the species.
Without out it there would be no one to be happy
Perhaps its like being busy in attaining happiness.Well, ok. Why continue it though if they ain't going to be happy?
I think a greater purpose for humans is for each individual to have the happiness of others in consideration whilst seeking their own, such that what they do doesn't necessarily deprive others of such - which is a tall ask, given that virtually everything we do does tend to affect others. But we are not going to get happier, or contented, overall if we blindly aim just for our own happiness. Fulfilment as an individual - which can vary so enormously anyway - gives us plenty of scope to make our own lives happier. And in my experience, anything that one achieves that harms no other tends to give one the best chance for such, and where perhaps one learns something about oneself or in general. I think it is folly to expect one to live in some state of happiness but just coping with the ups and downs of life would seem a more realistic option - and many cannot do this.Is there a greater purpose than personal happiness? What is that purpose? And how is it greater?
This is happiness in the sense of contentedness, or fulfillment.
"Are you happy in life?" is not asking if you are always merry. It is asking if your life is, on balance, a fulfilling one.
I think a greater purpose for humans is for each individual to have the happiness of others in consideration whilst seeking their own, such that what they do doesn't necessarily deprive others of such - which is a tall ask, given that virtually everything we do does tend to affect others. But we are not going to get happier, or contented, overall if we blindly aim just for our own happiness. Fulfilment as an individual - which can vary so enormously anyway - gives us plenty of scope to make our own lives happier. And in my experience, anything that one achieves that harms no other tends to give one the best chance for such, and where perhaps one learns something about oneself or in general. I think it is folly to expect one to live in some state of happiness but just coping with the ups and downs of life would seem a more realistic option - and many cannot do this.
Look around at all those who exploit others?Evidence, please!
Look around at all those who exploit others?
Well I doubt one can provide any solid evidence on this. It just seems to me that a very small number do affect the lives of others so much more, and often where their behaviour is for self-promotion - an example being the excellent Trump twit. And this tends to apply in so many areas - that some are much more inclined towards their own 'success' as they are in the welfare of any others. For whatever reasons, many do seem to be much more selfish than others, and affecting the lives of so many.Yeah, but that is not evidence. If we follow your reasoning it ends as a feeling in you. I accept that you can do that as you, but I doubt you are a "we". In effect you have stated your opinion for how we ought to do happiness.
Well I doubt one can provide any solid evidence on this. It just seems to me that a very small number do affect the lives of others so much more, and often where their behaviour is for self-promotion - an example being the excellent Trump twit. And this tends to apply in so many areas - that some are much more inclined towards their own 'success' as they are in the welfare of any others. For whatever reasons, many do seem to be much more selfish than others, and affecting the lives of so many.
Learn, discuss, educate others, etc. - all the normal things we do in life - and to use our votes to not vote in the idiots or the oppressors, or to stand up to them when they vote themselves in. But basically, to be honest when looking at evidence or in searching such out, even if one isn't endowed with the best mind. So as not to put one's own needs, desires, or preferences as being higher than others - just in seeing that others have such too and deserve as much of a life as we would want.Yes! But nothing follows from that. In effect you have hit the "is-ought" problem. It is as you described, therefore I, you, we ought to do what?
Learn, discuss, educate others, etc. - all the normal things we do in life - and to use our votes to not vote in the idiots or the oppressors, or to stand up to them when they vote themselves in. But basically, to be honest when looking at evidence or in searching such out, even if one isn't endowed with the best mind. So as not to put one's own needs, desires, or preferences as being higher than others - just in seeing that others have such too and deserve as much of a life as we would want.