• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Halloween, celebrating Satan's birthday?

tumbleweed41

Resident Liberal Hippie
Satan did not have a birthday. Originally created as Lucifer, he dates back to the beginning of time. Angels don't have birthdays because they were never born.

As a troll, you succeed in causing annoyance.

Lucifer is the Latin Vulgate translation of the description of a Babylonian King in Isaiah.
The word is not used anywhere in the Bible as a name for Satan.
 

tomato1236

Ninja Master
Halloween is terrific, in theory. I just hate dressing up. But the candy, parties, ghosts, devil worship and pure evil are all good fun.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Alas, I was away for Halloween this year, but even in the airport, some dressed up for the day. I went for subtlety....my Mambo
(a wicked Australian company) shirt with evil green grinning pinnaples on it. I hope that all had a perfectly revolting Halloween!

Btw, some costume suggestions.....I bet:
Tomato1236 would make a killer tomato.
Meow Mix & Katzpur would both be felinacious Cat Women.
Smoke would be a wrathful wraith.
Wirey....wherever he is....could dress up & act like a normal person.
Midnite Pete could go as the revolting one....to slither a mile in my shoes.
Tumbleweed would be....what else?...a tumbleweed!
 
Last edited:

McBell

Unbound
Lucifer is the Latin Vulgate translation of the description of a Babylonian King in Isaiah.
The word is not used anywhere in the Bible as a name for Satan.
Lucifer is a title and means "morning star".
Jesus also once carried the title of Lucifer for a time.
Satan merely means "adversary".

Interesting how neither one of the titles is ever used as a name in the Bible...
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
Revelation 22:16

You mean this one?

ego Iesus misi angelum meum testificari vobis haec in ecclesiis ego sum radix et genus David stella splendida et matutina


'Cause the word "Lucifer" is nowhere to be seen.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member

Hey, you said that Jesus bore the title of Lucifer for a time, and when an explanation was asked for, you cited a verse.

And seeing as the word "lucifer" does not occur in that verse, it is not an example of Jesus bearing that name.

If you want a verse where it's at least implies Jesus being called Lucifer, here you go:

et habemus firmiorem propheticum sermonem cui bene facitis adtendentes quasi lucernae lucenti in caliginoso loco donec dies inlucescat et lucifer oriatur in cordibus vestris

Translation: (NAST)
19 We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.

2 Peter 1:19
 

EtuMalku

Abn Iblis ابن إبليس
Isaiah 14:12 -- (King James and related versions)
"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning?

(Hebrew Bible)
"O Morning-Star, son of the dawn!"

The King James Version is based on the Vulgate, the Latin translation of Jerome. Jerome translated the Hebrew helel (bright or brilliant one) as "Lucifer," which was a reasonable Latin equivalent.

Then we have Jesus: Revelation 22:16
"I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star."
 
Top