metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
There's a fairly common misconception that the purpose of peer-review is to seek conformity, whereas it is in reality the opposite. What it does is to allow other scientists to check out the evidence presented and then allow them to throw in their own evidence and two cents.
Thus, to put out the evidence and analysis of just one person, or even one group, as if it were a slam-dunk fact is really missing what the purpose of the process really is.
Thus, to put out the evidence and analysis of just one person, or even one group, as if it were a slam-dunk fact is really missing what the purpose of the process really is.