Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I didn't say you could succeed, I said you're trying. I am living evidence of your failure.how can i " MAKE" you do anything? you say i am tring to make you conform.
And I love how my choice in love is compared to / thou shall not kill. (nice)i love how wearing my socks is compared to / thou shall not kill. ( nice):thud:
What slipped in where? You do know that the things you quoted were all written this century, right?its funny how all those litle things just " slipped " in there.
mabey from our forefathers?:drool:
That says nothing about their right to control those of us who disagree with them.
here we go with this " controling" thing again.
like the geico caveman says " WHAT".
I didn't say you could succeed, I said you're trying. I am living evidence of your failure.
You are not aware of any ways that anyone can make anyone else do things?
And I love how my choice in love is compared to / thou shall not kill. (nice)
You have as much say about other people's romantic choices as I do about your fashion choices.
btw, and in a small aside, if you are wearing mixed fibers, God also has something to say about your fashion choices. They're an abomination!
I'm always surprised when religious folks use as their second debate point the rationale that being gay isn't normal because they can't naturally reproduce. So what? You want to discriminate against a body of people because they can't make babies?
That's like saying you want to discriminate against genuises...they're a minority population genetically. You wouldn't think of discriminating against them.
What about adult natural blondes? I can assure you that an adult natural blonde is definitely a minority on the planet genetically. You wouldn't think about telling them they can't get married.
No, your reasoning always comes back to religion. You cannot push your religious convictions on others. How would you like it if I told you because you were a genius you're a sicko and can't get married? Seems ludicrous doesn't it? Well, think about it a bit longer because that's exactly the correlation between a genius and a gay. Both are a minority genetically and neither is "wrong" in nature.
What slipped in where? You do know that the things you quoted were all written this century, right?
Your position is that since you believe that your holy book proscribes gay sex as a sin, it is therefore morally wrong. It doesn't follow, unless you agree that you should give up your socks and your bacon and eggs as immoral.can you give me evidence of me trying to conform you?
Me, did you miss it?who said same sex is a " romanitc choice"
Who else?and by the way these are MY OPNIONS.
And I think you should decide what you should do, and I should decide what I should do, as long as I'm minding my own business and not trying to make you do it too.i think you should not commit murder, i think you should not have sex with a sheep, and i think you should not sleep with the same sex.
Because it matters to you.and if my bible does not matter to you , why try and Quote it?
Not at all. You contend that it's not "natural" to have sex with a man. My previous argument still stands for atheists as well. Anyone who uses the argument that homosexuality is not natural has no logical reason to back it up. What's considered natural? Something that shows up in nature in abundance? Is that your definition of "natural"?
can you give me evidence of me trying to conform you?
who said same sex is a " romanitc choice"
and by the way these are MY OPNIONS.
i think you should not commit murder, i think you should not have sex with a sheep, and i think you should not sleep with the same sex.
and if my bible does not matter to you , why try and Quote it?
What are you referring to? It might help if you use the quote function.
Your position is that since you believe that your holy book proscribes gay sex as a sin, it is therefore morally wrong. It doesn't follow, unless you agree that you should give up your socks and your bacon and eggs as immoral.
Me, did you miss it?
Who else?
And I think you should decide what you should do, and I should decide what I should do, as long as I'm minding my own business and not trying to make you do it too.
Because it matters to you.
so a murder is ok, as long as he minds his own business , the guy screwing the sheep on tv is ok. the gay pride march that says it not " wrong" to have same sex is ok?
just do it in your house and keep your march and your rainbow bumber sticker to yourself.
i will mind my business if you mind yours.:angel2:
But you are not minding your business, you are minding mine. You are telling me the public school system should come under your moral guidelines. You are telling me that any lifestyle other than your own must remain behind closed doors. You are telling me what I can and cannot do. That is what is wrong. That is why you are wrong. Believing what you want is fine, having your own opinions are fine, living your life and teaching your children your beliefs is all fine. Now allow me the same options and give me the same respect.
Funny how those good Christian people who care so much about the Bible never take the time, in between judging us, and attacking us, and lying about us, and voting to keep us third-class citizens, never think to repent of their own hardheartedness, and never take time to read that Bible.the bible seems to be the basis for " morals" for most of this country.
When you're older, you'll understand things better.Yes I have (a logical reason).The logical reason is sex has been "designed" by evolution/nature to reproduce.Yes,sex is great/enjoyable but the underlying reason for it is reproduction.You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise.
I love sex,BUT,I also realise what its for.You are correct,I am saying it is purely for the procreation of the species (any species come to that).You are wrong in saying that I think having sex for any other reason than procreation is wrong.You are getting mixed up with your personal reasons and the underlying reasons for sex.The underlying reason for sex is for reproduction,nothing more.Your genes are only interested in that.You as a person may (or may not) have other personal reasons but in the universal scheme of things they are insignificant.
As regards everyone becoming homosexual this is just an hyphothesis of why reproduction is the prime reason for sex ie if it happened we would die out.
Enjoy your sex.elaborate it with as much emotive reasoning you want,BUT don't deny why its there, REPRODUCTION.
ps sorry for the late reply,been down to the pub .
Did he say Homosexuality is not natural?When you're older, you'll understand things better.
[
http://www.massresistance.org/media/video/brainwashing.html
and you were saying...........:rainbow1:
Are you aware that homosexuality is found in the animal kingdom? How can that be if every creature under the sun is meant to reproduce?Yes I have (a logical reason).The logical reason is sex has been "designed" by evolution/nature to reproduce.Yes,sex is great/enjoyable but the underlying reason for it is reproduction.You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise.
Why not ? Because heterosexuality is the norm.Homosexuality is not ,Its just the genetic message getting distorted in the brain.About the only thing normal about it is the number of times it happens.
[
http://www.massresistance.org/media/video/brainwashing.html
and you were saying...........:rainbow1: