Pogo
Well-Known Member
Medicaid....what about those who can't afford Medicare?
my little avacado
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Medicaid....what about those who can't afford Medicare?
Outside of misusing the word "socialized", I agree, because what many other nations have is not true "socialized" medicine where everyone works for the government...would love to see a non-politically motivated study done that did a real comparison between socialized medicine and what the US has..
Or another possibility: in a socialized medical system, the portion of health care costs currently going to things like stock buybacks would be freed up to spend on things like stable, predictable funding for medical research.Let’s not ignore that the United States leads the world in medical innovation and technology. There must be some reason for that, and I sometimes wonder if we go too far down the socialist route, if the United States will lose its innovative edge to the detriment of the world.
What makes me really happy is that the Millennials and the Gen Z are mostly childless. The Gen Z almost entirely.Medicaid.
my little avacado
In a socialized healthcare system the money circulates because it is issued by the State. It doesn't end up in the pockets of greedy insurance companies.Or another possibility: in a socialized medical system, the portion of health care costs currently going to things like stock buybacks would be freed up to spend on things like stable, predictable funding for medical research.
Yeah whateverOutside of misusing the word "socialized", I agree, because what many other nations have is not true "socialized" medicine where everyone works for the government.
Yeah, the US government.Let’s not ignore that the United States leads the world in medical innovation and technology. There must be some reason for that, and I sometimes wonder if we go too far down the socialist route, if the United States will lose its innovative edge to the detriment of the world.
copy for youI'm against insurance companies, CEOs that get wealthy while patients suffer etc. Medical innovation needs to be taken into account as you note.
I missed the question in too many posts. They are government employees at various government levels from local to national.Yeah whatever
You never answered my question...how are the police and fire socialized
Thank YouI missed the question in too many posts. They are government employees at various government levels from local to national.
People have to pay for healthcare regardless of what system you use, but a socialized system has been shown to be more efficient, and less expensive.Cons
- Increased taxes: Socialized medicine may require higher taxes.
In a private system people who don't have the money or insurance that will pay for their medical procedure often choose to wait while they save up enough money, and those are the lucky ones.
- Wait times: There may be wait times for medical procedures.
A stable reliable healthcare system is good for the economy. A healthier workforce is better for the workers, and better for the employers.
- National debt: Socialized medicine may add to the national debt.
Some individuals might lose some choice, but most would have expanded options. It certainly would be a more equitable system.
- Reduced choice: Some argue that individuals would lose some choice under socialized medicine.
I don't see any evidence of this at all. But even if it were so, it would still increase the quality of care for the majority, who would suddenly have some access, rather than none.
- Quality of care: Some fear that the quality of care would erode if doctors and nurses became government employees.
Why doesn’t that happen in existing socialist focused countries? Why don’t those countries lead in medical innovation?Or another possibility: in a socialized medical system, the portion of health care costs currently going to things like stock buybacks would be freed up to spend on things like stable, predictable funding for medical research.
Exactly.As Americans, we are spoiled to short wait times, private or semi private rooms, etc. Many countries that offer socialized medicine also hope (or even require) that the citizens carry private insurance as well.
Not sure how you think that is in any way related to how health care plans are run.Let’s not ignore that the United States leads the world in medical innovation and technology. There must be some reason for that, and I sometimes wonder if we go too far down the socialist route, if the United States will lose its innovative edge to the detriment of the world.
Exactly socialism. Taxes are collected from everyone and used to provide necessary services to everyone, free of charge. That's exactly socialism. If you'd like to claim that fire and police services aren't a form of socialism, please post a picture of someone's police or fire bill. There isn't one, because they're socialism. Just like schools. Roads. Power distribution. The military. Snow removal. Garbage collection. Park lawn mowing. All of it, all socialist.Thank You
Not the same as socialized medicine, not even close, but OK.... and does not make the system Socialism.... but OK...... seems, at least, IMO, a silly example to use to justify socialized medicine or socialism.... But then the same could be said for the military or any city, county, municipality, state, federal government employee.... anyone receiving, unemployment or Government assistance....
stop, your Canadian, and obviously know little abot TexasExactly socialism. Taxes are collected from everyone and used to provide necessary services to everyone, free of charge. That's exactly socialism. If you'd like to claim that fire and police services aren't a form of socialism, please post a picture of someone's police or fire bill. There isn't one, because they're socialism. Just like schools. Roads. Power distribution. The military. Snow removal. Garbage collection. Park lawn mowing. All of it, all socialist.
The problem is a bunch of right wing nut jobs have tried to equate "Socialism" with "Evil". And it's working. The great thing about people who get their education from social media is how easy it is to trick them into voting against their own best interests. Socialism is nothing more than the members of a rational society pooling resources so they can all live. Sharing a plow and horse in a village in the old days was socialism. Giving incredibly rich people the opportunity to sit on a slightly larger pile of treasure while a poor person looses everything because they were unlucky enough to get sick is the actual opposite of socialism.
I was unlucky enough to get very sick, like maybe going to die sick. I was lucky enough to live in the Socialist Worker's Paradise of Canuckistan, so my medical bills throughout the whole thing were primarily some prescriptions and parking at the hospital (which should be f$%^ing free if you're sick). I still have all my money, my house, my car, and do you know why? I live in a country where a guy named Tommy Douglas (distant relative of Donald and Keifer Sutherland, as fate would have it) said being sick shouldn't break you and make you poor. It's bad luck, and no one deserves to be destroyed because they're unlucky.