sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
How so?Well that was off topic.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How so?Well that was off topic.
How so?
See post #72 for his interpretation.It didn't addess dopp's response to your post. It wasn't even in the same universe.
He didn't interpret the text, so you have no basis for asserting that his understanding of the text doesn't fit with rest of the Bible.
I have a whole post that can back up my claim. Perhaps you could address my points in that thread.And your claim that your interpretation is done in light of the whole Bible is merely a claim to authority, and it's empty.
See post #72 for his interpretation.
I have a whole post that can back up my claim. Perhaps you could address my points in that thread.
I have a whole post that can back up my claim. Perhaps you could address my points in that thread.
The issue flowed from there.Ah, you weren't quoting #72.
I see. You're correct, end of discussion. Thanks Daddy.I see. I don't know if I'll address your points... for me it's a simple reading issue and one doesn't need a complex hermeneutical argument or debate.
In other words, if you can't understand the text from my post and dopp's, there's no hope for further discussion.
The issue flowed from there.
I see. You're correct, end of discussion. Thanks Daddy.
You're correct, end of discussion.
In light of all the stump threads.
I am a Chrisitan. So ask me a question about Chrisitanity which may stump me.
You know what to do.
-Why do old Baptist Ministers ware white belts and shoes after Labor Day ?
Maybe you're confusing those guys with Mark Twain?
I will give you that one :bow: now....
Why don't Southern Baptists make love standing up ?
I will give you that one :bow: now....
Why don't Southern Baptists make love standing up ?
Cuz it might lead to dancing.
There ya go. I haven't heard that in a good long while.
I'm not sure I even understand what the discussion would be. The text says what it says. I have no interest in debating his theology.Well, at least between us on that topic.
Dopp is fair game. :beach:
doppelgänger;2380376 said:I'm not sure I even understand what the discussion would be. The text says what it says. I have no interest in debating his theology.
I don't do theology.
The interesting thing about Romans 1-2 is that the primary, if not the only, scripture from the NT cited to condemn homosexuality is that very same list at the end of Romans 1. In context, what Paul is saying is that if you claim that "God" will judge any of those activities as sin or profess to condemn people who do any of those things, when in fact, because of the "riches" of God's kindness and forebearance they will not be judged - then the only person who is going to be judged is YOU, for showing contempt for those riches.Well, at least between us on that topic.
Dopp is fair game. :beach:
It's in spite of the teachings, but because of the religions supposedly based on them.The essence of hypocrisy is saying one thing and doing another. Pertinent to your comments about jugmentalism, all religions preach that we should not be judgmental, but they all are. An interesting question is whether this is in spite of the religion or because of it.