If I can be of help yes!
Not "am I right or wrong," but, what do you think? Agree? Disagree? Reasons?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If I can be of help yes!
Who wrote the Bible?
Can someone produce just 'ONE' verse from the Bible that mentions who wrote the Bible???
I searched and searched (Google) I can't find anything!!!!
One verse that authenticates authorship!
One verse that commands that author/prophet to write that book by GOD
Thanks in advance, will read enlightened answers later....
I dunno. The Gospels are beautiful stories, but the narrative is so heavily borrowed from other myths (the myth of focus being the Osiris myth of Egyptian mythology)
that it's pretty clear that it is fiction, even though most scholars agree that there was a man named Jesus (Yeshua) who went around teaching some of the things that the gospels record.
However, the Trojan War was an historical event; it's just that they were fighting over trade routes instead of some woman.
If you are referring to Iliad I have not read that book and so I cannot comment.Not "am I right or wrong," but, what do you think? Agree? Disagree? Reasons?
Why not?
So?
Extremely dishonest.
I dunno. The Gospels are beautiful stories, but the narrative is so heavily borrowed from other myths (the myth of focus being the Osiris myth of Egyptian mythology) that it's pretty clear that it is fiction
I know that, but I was worried that my post would run too long. Thanks for posting this.
Seems like several authors is a Biblical trademark. lol
Thank you for the correction.
Thank you for the extension. I actually don't know much about Paul's letters, which is why I wasn't able to portray much detail. Would you mind citing some sources, because I'd like to read more on the subject.
While technically accurate the negative semantic load of this term would not have been in the minds of the authors' audience. Copying, with or without citation, paraphrasing or no, was very common.
Not entirely correct. For one, evidence from research into the reliability or oral transmissions makes it possible (and some scholars have argued for it) that Q was an "oral text" so to speak.
Second, both Matthew and Luke have material unique to each (often called M and L in NT scholarship).
That is almost certainly part of it. However, each author not only had his/her own opinions, they also had an audience. John's gospel is the most theological in nature, and shows perhaps the most redaction of the Jesus tradition. He was clearly addressing specific issues which were present in either his community or in the christian community at large (some have postulated his work addresses a proto-gnostic christology/theology/cosmology).
The synoptics on the other hand show more interest in preserving the tradition as is (Matthew being the most likely to show redaction of the three). Mark's gospel does rather resemble a work such as the one Papias describes John Mark as writing (whereas our matthew is clearly not the one he was talking about, being originally written in greek, not hebrew). Luke is the most self-consciously historical, and his comments in the prologue to luke and acts place him squarely in the greek historical tradition.
In other words, the gulf between John and the synoptics is partly to be explained by their respective dates, audience, and styles, not just beliefs and access to particular traditions.
The typo here makes it difficult to understand you (I hate to point out such mistakes, particularly since I make them constantly, but I would like to know what you are trying to say here).
No it hasn't in your case. You either forgot to address the OP or don't know the answer, and you couldn't have made your disposition any clearer!!!
Whatever! Your attitude and accusations are signs of psychotic illness.Your lies and deception got old the first page.
Back off newbie ...Whatever! Your attitude and accusations are signs of psychotic illness.
Your lies and deception got old the first page.
Back off newbie ...
Interesting.Whatever! Your attitude and accusations are signs of psychotic illness.
On Q-
I located two PBS articles on Q and if you want criticism of the Q hypothesis you can purchase
"The Case Against Q" by Mark Goodacre,
"Borrowing" might be a more proper term that doesn't fall victim to hyperbole.
I would like to apologize for mindlessly wandering through what appears to be your domain,
Where was it answered?Interesting.
You ask a question.
Said question gets answered by more than one post.
You claim your question was not answered.
That makes you a liar.
So as you can see, you are STILL being dishonest.
I made no accusation.
I stated a fact.
Your dislike of the fact is completely irrelevant.
I don't understand where this statement comes from.
But thank-you anyways for your input.
Where was it answered?
That someone expresses an opinion doesn't resolve the question posed absolutely.
You have yet to learn manners let alone skills of debating because the latter necessitates intelligence as you clearly lack by your sociopathic behavior. What confirmation does this Forum offer that its members are credited in theology? None! They could all be social outcasts with little intelligence too offer. You see to me everyone could be a freak, like you!
Where was it answered?
That someone expresses an opinion doesn't resolve the question posed absolutely.
You have yet to learn manners let alone skills of debating because the latter necessitates intelligence as you clearly lack by your sociopathic behavior. What confirmation does this Forum offer that its members are credited in theology? None! They could all be social outcasts with little intelligence too offer. You see to me everyone could be a freak, like you!
Such grammar!You have yet to learn manners let alone skills of debating because the latter necessitates intelligence as you clearly lack by your sociopathic behavior.
Why are you searching Google rather than the Bible?Who wrote the Bible?
Can someone produce just 'ONE' verse from the Bible that mentions who wrote the Bible???