Again, people with psychosis don’t conclude that “someone resurrected” that has never been reported.
Why is this so hard to understand?
From: Paul had psychosis
You don’t get
Paul and the disciples concluded that Jesus resurected
Told you, you would ignore me.
There are many many reports of resurrection. It was especially popular around the time of Jesus. Persian resurrection first, which the Jews picked up on and then Greek resurrection with a spirit body, which the Christians picked up on.
The disciples are people from a story and any who are real are people who bought into a trending story and were primed by already believing Judaism and now the natural extention of it, Christianity.
This had been happening in every nation the Greeks occupied and introduced Hellenistic religion into. Israel was the last.
Paul also came across a new Jewish mystery religion and bought into it. Like thousands of others pushing a religion he added visions of the new savior deity.
Muhammad saw an angel, Joe Smith saw an angel, people make claims of sightings quite often. It's not uncommon.
Paul didn't conclude anything. He made a claim he saw an arc-angel. Probably because he bought into the mystery religion offshoot of Judaism. He heard Jews now have their own savior deity and embraced it. The "visions" are probably the same as Joe Smith and Muhammad. And any other claims of visitations by deities. Like Abhay Charanaravinda Bhaktivedanta or
Swami Prabhupada who had several real visions of Lord Krishna. Yes he also wrote letters, wrote for a publication and was tasked with spreading the message of
Chaitanya Mahaprabhu in the English language. Hmmmm, sound familiar?
Paul and the disciples concluded Jesus resurrected because it's part of the new myth that was created several decades earlier.
A son or daughter of a supreme God who undergoes a passion and often a resurrection to defeat death and confer the benefits to the followers is what Hellenistic Greek salvation is. The hub of Christianity is Antioch, the center of Hellenistic culture.
Current books demonstrating Jesus is a Greek deity:
David Litwa, Lesus Deus
Richard Miller, Resurrection and Reception in Early Christianity
Dennis McDonald, The Gospels and Homer
Hellenistic religion, any of the various systems of beliefs and practices of eastern Mediterranean peoples from 300 bc to ad 300. The period of Hellenistic influence, when taken as a whole, constitutes one of the most creative periods in the history of religions. It was a time of spiritual
www.britannica.com
-the seasonal drama was homologized to a
soteriology (salvation concept) concerning the destiny, fortune, and salvation of the individual after death.
-his led to a change from concern for a religion of national prosperity to one for individual
salvation, from focus on a particular
ethnic group to concern for every human. The prophet or
saviour replaced the priest and king as the chief religious figure.
-his process was carried further through the identification of the experiences of the soul that was to be saved with the
vicissitudes of a divine but fallen soul, which had to be redeemed by cultic activity and divine intervention. This view is illustrated in the concept of the paradoxical figure of the saved saviour,
salvator salvandus.
-Other deities, who had previously been associated with national destiny (
e.g., Zeus, Yahweh, and Isis), were raised to the status of
transcendent, supreme
-The temples and cult institutions of the various Hellenistic religions were repositories of the knowledge and techniques necessary for
salvation and were the agents of the public worship of a particular deity. In addition, they served an important sociological role. In the new,
cosmopolitan ideology that followed Alexander’s conquests, the old nationalistic and ethnic boundaries had broken down and the problem of religious and social identity had become
acute.
-Most of these groups had regular meetings for a communal meal that served the dual role of
sacramental participation (referring to the use of material elements believed to convey spiritual benefits among the members and with their deity)
-Hellenistic philosophy (Stoicism,
Cynicism, Neo-Aristotelianism, Neo-Pythagoreanism, and Neoplatonism) provided key formulations for
Jewish,
Christian, and
Muslim philosophy,
theology, and
mysticism through the 18th century
- The basic forms of worship of both the Jewish and Christian
communities were heavily influenced in their formative period by Hellenistic practices, and this remains fundamentally unchanged to the present time. Finally, the central religious literature of both traditions—the Jewish
Talmud (an
authoritative compendium of law, lore, and interpretation), the
New Testament, and the later
patristic literature of the early Church Fathers—are characteristic Hellenistic documents both in form and content.
-Other traditions even more radically reinterpreted the ancient figures. The cosmic or seasonal drama was interiorized to refer to the divine
soul within man that must be liberated.
-Each persisted in its native land with little perceptible change save for its becoming linked to
nationalistic or
messianic movements (centring on a deliverer figure)
-and
apocalyptic traditions (referring to a belief in the dramatic intervention of a god in human and natural events)
- Particularly noticeable was the success of a variety of prophets, magicians, and healers—
e.g., John the Baptist, Jesus,
Simon Magus,
Apollonius of Tyana,
Alexander the Paphlagonian, and the cult of the healer Asclepius—whose preaching corresponded to the activities of various Greek and Roman philosophic missionaries
This describes the change from OT to NT exactly yet is also describing what happened to many religions similar to Judaism in the Mediterranean . You could not get a more reasonable explanation. The idea that this one version is actually real, despite all the obvious reasons the myths were added on from Greek sources (also the Greeks invaded, another criteria for the creation of a mystery religion) is quite absurd.