What are you on about????It doesn't give children their rights
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What are you on about????It doesn't give children their rights
What total and utter crap
- Open homosexuals are oc not following the religion and are therefore not morally upright
- It leads into the degradation of morals in society in general
I had a really cool dismissal of all this but I deleted it as it was uncivil
- it's forbidden by God
- It's unnatural
- Sodomy is unhealthy
- It doesn't produce children
- It doesn't give children their rights
- Open homosexuals are oc not following the religion and are therefore not morally upright
- It leads into the degradation of morals in society in general
Whose God? Why would the opinion of one's God matter to others who do not share the same beliefs?
- it's forbidden by God
What is natural?
- It's unnatural
Any intercourse practiced irresponsibly can lead to negative consequences.
- Sodomy is unhealthy
Why does that matter?
- It doesn't produce children
What does that even mean?
- It doesn't give children their rights
What if they are not associated with any religion that forbids homosexuality? Why should it matter?
- Open homosexuals are oc not following the religion and are therefore not morally upright
From typical fallacies like cause/correlation, slippery slope, etc. It's also blaming a smaller more vulnerable group for the overall ills of a society, while not addressing broader issues. Maybe from not wanting to take responsibility for one's own actions or behavior.
- It leads into the degradation of morals in society in general
No, not just sex — life.Oh no!
Sex for reasons other than reproduction
The horror!!
I'm not following you hereNo, not just sex — life.
Many animals eat their "brother's" corpse. Why don't you do the same? "It's natural."Oh right, so homosexuality in animals has never been observed!
I said it's unhealthy. Glad we can agree on that one.Not all gays practice sodomy and not all people who practice sodomy are gay
- it's forbidden by God
- It's unnatural
- Sodomy is unhealthy
- It doesn't produce children
- It doesn't give children their rights
- Open homosexuals are oc not following the religion and are therefore not morally upright
- It leads into the degradation of morals in society in general
Many animals eat their "brother's" corpse. Why don't you do the same? "It's natural."
There's only one God. Doesn't matter if it doesn't matter. I never said it "should matter". I said it's been forbidden by God.Whose God? Why would the opinion of one's God matter to others who do not share the same beliefs?
Oh right so sex between two loving and consenting adults is akin to cannibalising one's family members??????Many animals eat their "brother's" corpse. Why don't you do the same? "It's natural."
Children have a right to a mother and a father.What does that even mean?
They aren't morally upright. That matters regardless of their religion. The society needs moral members.What if they are not associated with any religion that forbids homosexuality? Why should it matter?
I'm not writing a book here. The topic is homosexuality.It's also blaming a smaller more vulnerable group for the overall ills of a society, while not addressing broader issues.
It's also not anyone's business but that of those involvedI said it's unhealthy. Glad we can agree on that one.
According to you both are natural.Oh right so sex between two loving and consenting adults is akin to cannibalising one's family members??????
Google it. It's worse. It just wasn't made for that filthy purpose.It's also not anyone's business but that of those involved
And I don't see how it is any more unhealthy than vaginal intercourse
And according to you natural = goodAccording to you both are natural.
It obviously is.What total and utter crap
This is obviously not true