Majikthise
nude
L - Lesbian
G - Gay
B - Bisexual
T - Trans
I - Inquiring
Q - Queer
I hope that helps
Thanks!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
L - Lesbian
G - Gay
B - Bisexual
T - Trans
I - Inquiring
Q - Queer
I hope that helps
Here in California, they had a proposition (Prop 8) which asked if the definition of the word marriage should mean one man and one woman....it passed. The gays are fighting tooth and nail to have it overturned.
How is anyone, religious or not supposed to "keep out of the way" when it is on the ballot?
After all, weren't we voting on the accepted meaning of a word?
That wont happen.
"a." had been the definition since the first dictionary.
"b" has been added in the last 10 years.
The vote was clear: people wanted the old definition to stick.
I agree that it should never have been on the ballot...here's why: The Bible says homosexuality is wrong, therefore, christians CANNOT vote to condone same-sex marriage. If the government just said- "Hey same-sex marriage is lawful", it would fall under the category of "give unto Caesar that which is Caesars'" and I'd be fine with it.
I really don't give a rat's arse what people do....but if "forced" I will take the Bible's side every time.
There is considerable debate among Christians as to whether the Bible actually says homosexuality is wrong or not. I believe the verses used to condemn homosexuality have been taken out of context. For this reason, many Christians can, and do, condone same sex marriage.I agree that it should never have been on the ballot...here's why: The Bible says homosexuality is wrong, therefore, christians CANNOT vote to condone same-sex marriage.
It does make the point that if the subject is "sin", the discussion will inevitably turn to homosexuality (though we did give gluttons a run for their money for a couple of pages!). As a Christian myself I find it troubling that so many followers can be so obsessed over one perceived sin (emphasis on "preceived"), while turning a blind eye to some very well established sins. Dishonesty has become commonplace in our society, via politics, our legal system, media, and advertising. Nobody cares. People literally eat themselves to death. Nobody cares. And don't even get me started on greed and avarice.Typical day at RF.
Leviticus 18:22 should settle it with Jews and Christians
And see, this is where context matters. Can you tell me to whom this command was made (Lev 18:22), and why? Also, have you read Leviticus in its entirety? Why are Christians so quick to point to this one verse, while dismissing out of hand everything else written in this book?Leviticus Leviticus 18:22 should settle it with Jews and Christians
"Thou shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination."
But they still seem divided. It's their own morality conflicting with 'God's morality.' They can't truly believe what the bible says. Such conflict would surely peak their interest and fascination. That's why it is so discussed
We are not talking about a a robeluke 6:30 Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. 31 Do to others as you would have them do to you.
The same rights that come with such a government we have.Why not? It isn't your responsibility to police the morals of others, so regardless of whether or not you agree with or accept gay marriage, what right do you have to prevent it from happening?
The same rights that come with such a government we have.
It isn't your responsibility to police the morals of others,
:yes::clap:clap:clap:yes:i got new for ya, the pledge doesn't say... liberty and justice for the majority....
We still have the right to try and stop such a degrading thing as "homosexual marriage". Just like the government has the right to stop the traffic of illegal street drugs.i got new for ya, the pledge doesn't say... liberty and justice for the majority....
The problem is that you have to present a legitimate legal argument against same sex marriage.We still have the right to try and stop such a degrading thing as "homosexual marriage". Just like the government has the right to stop the traffic of illegal street drugs.
i got new for ya, the pledge doesn't say... liberty and justice for the majority....
this is an arrogant ideal...
I don't think a religion that mandates putting another group down to make its believers feel superior should be valid.
Ever.
I think followers of a religion based on the Bible should do what the Bible says.
I don't give an ants' arse about Biff and Barry and their hurt feelings.
Really. I don't.
I think followers of a religion based on the Bible should do what the Bible says.
I don't give an ants' arse about Biff and Barry and their hurt feelings.
Really. I don't.