Homosexuality not included.

[McBell]

Let's not forget what homosexuality IS. It is not just love and commitment and unicorns. Be aware of what it is you are supporting.
If you find the visual aspect of it I provided, uncomfortable....good.

Again, you are not presenting anything coherent.

Perhaps it is because I am not in your choir?

 

[Fester]

Logic, it seems, escapes you.

Not at all. You're attempting to paint homosexuality as nothing but sex acts. If that is true, then heterosexuality is nothing but sex acts, either. If heterosexuality includes attraction, affection, and love, as well as sexuality, then homosexuality does as well.

That is logic.

 

[waitasec]

Let's not forget what homosexuality IS. It is not just love and commitment and unicorns.

what's the problem here...?
if you are not a homosexual don't be one, that would be unhealthy.
seems pretty logical to me

Be aware of what it is you are supporting.

and what that might be, tolerance?

 

[waitasec]

You'd like to think I "always focus on sex". However, this is the first time I've brought it up.
I loved my father and brothers. I've never had sex with them, though. Does that make me a homosexual?

Loving your mother and sisters doesn't necessarily make you straight, either. Your point, whatever it may have been, is lost.

Logic, it seems, escapes you.

seriously?
you can't see how your weak argument was refuted?

bzzzzz
wrong try again....

 

[waitasec]

Not at all. You're attempting to paint homosexuality as nothing but sex acts. If that is true, then heterosexuality is nothing but sex acts, either. If heterosexuality includes attraction, affection, and love, as well as sexuality, then homosexuality does as well.

That is logic.

well said...

 

[espo35]

Not at all. You're attempting to paint homosexuality as nothing but sex acts. If that is true, then heterosexuality is nothing but sex acts, either. If heterosexuality includes attraction, affection, and love, as well as sexuality, then homosexuality does as well.

That is logic.

No. It is not JUST sex acts. But someone "accused" me of focusing on that part of it, which I refute.

You are 100% correct in saying homosexuality includes love an affection AS WELL AS sex acts.

Which was my exact point.

 

[espo35]

You always focus on sex. Get your mind out the gutter and focus on LOVE!

This is the post I am refuting. It implies that "love" should be the focus.

I replied that I loved my father, yet neither us are/were homo.

So, obviously, there IS MORE to being homo than just love.

Logic.

In this case, it would also include anal and/or oral sex on another man.

Which you boys seem to be all for.

(for whatever reason).......

 

[waitasec]

No. It is not JUST sex acts. But someone "accused" me of focusing on that part of it, which I refute.

You are 100% correct in saying homosexuality includes love an affection AS WELL AS sex acts.

Which was my exact point.

what a load of crap.
nice back pedaling....
this is what you said

Hey, if you boys want to feel good about having men cram their members down your waiting anii, that's grand.

Enjoy.

you seemed to have over looked everything else

 

[espo35]

what a load of crap.
nice back pedaling....
this is what you said




you seemed to have over looked everything else

Your reading comprehension is selective....at best.

But I'll stick by my statement....because THAT is what you are supporting when you support homosexuality.

If you really do support that of which man on man, anal sex is clearly a part....then OWN it.

 

[waitasec]

Your reading comprehension is selective....at best.

But I'll stick by my statement....because THAT is what you are supporting when you support homosexuality.

If you really do support that of which man on man anal sex is clearly a part....then OWN it.

again nothing but pure hot stinky horse pucky
i support the other things too of which you clearly deny....

 

[Fester]

This is the post I am refuting. It implies that "love" should be the focus.

I replied that I loved my father, yet neither us are/were homo.

So, obviously, there IS MORE to being homo than just love.

Logic.

In this case, it would also include anal and/or oral sex on another man.

Which you boys seem to be all for.

(for whatever reason).......

What troubles me is that you actually see this as sound reasoning.

Obvously there's more to being straight than just love. But I don't see you telling straights "if you want to stick your penis in vaginas, be my guest". That is the caliber of remark you made to gays that is causing the fuss here.

 

[espo35]

What troubles me is that you actually see this as sound reasoning.

Obvously there's more to being straight than just love. But I don't see you telling straights "if you want to stick your penis in vaginas, be my guest". That is the caliber of remark you made to gays that is causing the fuss here.

It is sound reasoning.

Look- here's my stance:

1. Homosexuality is not Biblically acceptable.

2. Homosexuality usually includes sex with the same gender.

Those are facts....like them or not.

That's it.

 

[waitasec]

It is sound reasoning.

Look- here's my stance:

1. Homosexuality is not Biblically acceptable.

2. Homosexuality usually includes sex with the same gender.

Those are facts....like them or not.

That's it.

1...then you shouldn't be a homosexual

2...really? i'm glad you cleared that up for us




obviously you are ignoring the pink elephant in the room...
careful, you might step in it's doo doo....
oh wait, you just did :sorry1:

 

[Me Myself]

How many pages has it been that homosexuality has been discussed in the "homosexuality not included" thread?

 

[espo35]

1...then you shouldn't be a homosexual

2...really? i'm glad you cleared that up for us




obviously you are ignoring the pink elephant in the room...
careful, you might step in it's doo doo....
oh wait, you just did :sorry1:

I'll take that as a rather childish concession.

 

[waitasec]

I'll take that as a rather childish concession.

well if your intention was to lower the bar, and to not be taken seriously
you did that all by yourself....

good job well done :clap

 

[espo35]

well if your intention was to lower the bar, and to not be taken seriously
you did that all by yourself....

good job well done :clap

If stating facts is "lowering the bar", I bet you suck at the Limbo.

 

[Carpenter Rabbi]

Espo, do you have any evidence for homosexuality "usually" including sex with the same gender any more than heterosexuality "usually" including sex with the opposite gender (If, by usually, you mean more than 50% of the time of homosexuals is spent having sex with the same sex)?

 

[waitasec]

If stating facts is "lowering the bar", I bet you suck at the Limbo.

what facts have you stated...?
that homosexuality requires having sex with someone of the same gender?
like i said, i'm glad you're here to tell us these things...

that the bible does not accept homosexuality?
well lets see here, the very same bible condones the beating of a slave with in an inch of their lives and the selling off of their children, so i wouldn't give the bible any validity as far as what is and isn't moral....

 

[A. T. Henderson]

The same rights that come with such a government we have.

That is simply not the case. The rights given you by your government do not include the right to interfere with the civil liberties of others: that is specifically and clearly prohibited.