• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Homosexuality. Why is it wrong?

JacobEzra.

Dr. Greenthumb
Fail because neither can infertile heterosexuals. Are infertile heterosexuals a threat to the human race? Should they be allowed to marry and have sex?
lol would it make you feel better if I said yeah? jk jk

If their was more homosexuals then heterosexuals, what would be the outcome?
 

Many Sages One Truth

Active Member
lol would it make you feel better if I said yeah? jk jk

If their was more homosexuals then heterosexuals, what would be the outcome?

Well since there isn't, that's not really relevant to homosexuality in the present context is it? Even if there were, big deal, we need a population decrease. I think though that the laws of evolution pretty much prevent from there ever being the majority homosexuals.'

Do you see how you have to grasp for straws when trying to find a moral reason to condemn homosexuality? Homophobia is what's unnatural. Humans are the only species that display hostility toward homosexuals of their species.
 

JacobEzra.

Dr. Greenthumb
Well since there isn't, that's not really relevant to homosexuality in the present context is it? Even if there were, big deal, we need a population decrease. I think though that the laws of evolution pretty much prevent from there ever being the majority homosexuals.'

Do you see how you have to grasp for straws when trying to find a moral reason to condemn homosexuality? Homophobia is what's unnatural. Humans are the only species that display hostility toward homosexuals of their species.
There is a moral reason to condemn homosexuality. Its not natural. But hey, whatever.

I am not grasping for straws. Just a lack of understanding :rolleyes:

Just seems to destroy the reason we are given sperm
 

Storm

ThrUU the Looking Glass
There is a moral reason to condemn homosexuality. Its not natural. But hey, whatever.

I am not grasping for straws. Just a lack of modernism :rolleyes:
Except that it is, and even if it weren't, all sorts of unnatural things are morally neutral or positive.
 

JacobEzra.

Dr. Greenthumb
Except that it is, and even if it weren't, all sorts of unnatural things are morally neutral or positive.
But is the natural reason of having sperm to be used in that way?

Just like it is unnatural for sperm to be caught in condem, it is unnatural to go elsewhere but the vagina. Its the seed of life.
 

Storm

ThrUU the Looking Glass
But is the natural reason of having sperm to be used in that way?

Just like it is unnatural for sperm to be caught in condem, it is unnatural to go elsewhere but the vagina. Its the seed of life.
1) Would you care to address my point?
2) So female homosex is just fine, right?
3) That's just prudish.
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
Homosexuality is wrong because people are taught it's wrong and yucky, and they fear things that are different. Any other "arguments" they parrot are rationalizations after the fact - they are not reasons they think homosexuality is wrong.

Also, many closeted homosexuals express extreme homophobic views as a self-defense mechanism.
 

Nerthus

Wanderlust
No female homosex is not okay.

It's definitely okay with me. And, to be honest that's all I really care about. I don't care about whether you think it's okay, or whether your church thinks it's okay - as long as I am happy with it -that's good enough for me.
 
Top