It was a shallow report. I told you why
Stupid
Do some real research
I was talking about marriage in America. Polygamy is illegal. Off course ss "marriage" is the trojan horse
For this trail the ss forces admitted that there were no studies for homosexual men parenting and the lesbians studies were limited
That is such a stupid argument. From now I can do what some animals do and justify myself.
Check the court cases. You are wrong once again
You admit that you are a hater. Calling people who disagree with you haters is part of your hate. It is not healthy for you
1. It was a simple report totally unrelated to our discussion showing you that in those states that have embraced the American Ideal of Equality, marriage is totally unaffected.
2. Stupid? Any conspiracy theory is stupid.
3. Why should I do you homework for you. Provide links to your "real research" or admit you have no basis for your argument.
4. Polygamy is indeed illegal, now, but it was once legal, not only in those people here before Europeans, but before 1862 as well, before the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Law, a reaction to the growing Mormon religion, was signed into law.
This is also the Trojan horse YOU introduced into this debate as well. We speak of two law abiding, consenting adults wishing to partake of the same legal institution my wife and I enjoyed for over twenty years.
5. What trial? You keep stating something about studies when no studies have been brought up. Again, links, provide them or admit you have nothing.
6. Strawman.
7. Again, I don't have to do your homework for you. You made the proposition, YOU supply evidence. What court cases support your statements that religious freedom & rights have been effected in the six states that allow Equality.
BTW, there is no inherent right to impose your religion on others, if that's the angle you were looking for.
8. People disagree with me all the time. However, when a person advocates oppressing people for no good reason, that is hate, that is intolerance, that is bigotry, and none of those qualities should be tolerated.
The difference between you and I is that you use your hate to justify oppressing a people merely because a natural, inherent, unchangeable quality of that minority attacks your sensibilities, even though providing that minority with Equality of Marriage doesn't effect you in the least.
My hate is in defense of that minority.