Certainly not part of mainstream Islam or they wouldn't have destroyed countless Krishna temples, lol.Is that part of Islam belief as a whole or a "denomination" within Islam?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Certainly not part of mainstream Islam or they wouldn't have destroyed countless Krishna temples, lol.Is that part of Islam belief as a whole or a "denomination" within Islam?
The motive IS the action. We can change the words but the concept is the same.
A person doesn't learn to swim by reading a book and then jumping in the water. Of course knowledge helps know what everything is but the lesson isn't in the book, it's the actual practice.
The lesson is the practice not the result of it.
Understand?
I'm saying compassion (for example) IS the action or deed. Understand?
If I took a knife and killed someone just because, no motive, or anything like that, should I consider it neutral unless I have a motive behind it?
For me, the act of killing is bad regardless the person's motives. The act is the motive.
I understand that. Do you understand what I'm saying, though?
Regardless of how you take care of the lamb, the taking care of is the most important part not the motive behind it.
I put more emphasis on action because within the action is the compassion and love or the evil if you like. If not, then in your view, you can have abortion as long as it's for the right reasons.
I'm dating. The lady I am with we've been together for a good month and a half. She has a lot on her plate and we were getting close but then I decide that even though I'm still infatuated, there is a lot of things she has to handle with her family before going into any relationship. My decisions and motives mean nothing in and of themselves. You can see this as good another person can say its bad.
However, the good/bad part I only know because of the action I do. When I actually talk to her, that action alone is how she interprets what I do is good or bad. We can talk all day long but until there is an action, motives, decisions, etc don't stand up.
A lot of traditionalist who marry and want to part stay married because they made a physical vow to stay married until death do they part. That physical vow is much stronger than saying "I love you today now I don't tomorrow."
Physical is very important. Actions are the motives. Intimacy can't be intimacy unless you are intimate. Murder isn't considered a murder unless you actually murder someone. Motives are in the killing.
Governments have their own "morals." I don't agree with war regardless of how good the reasons are and how the statistics raise up for killing people.
That act of killing is immoral to me and no logistics or decisions can be separate from the action itself.
Understand?
How, exactly do Bahais worship, loverofhumanity?
You said that knowledge helps you know. That's an admission by you that theoretical knowledge is required apart from just practical. You also agree that they go hand in hand. The thing is you're basically agreeing that our deeds cant just be mindless acts but are premeditated.
Really we are agreeing just in different words.
You said that knowledge helps you know.
That's an admission by you that theoretical knowledge is required apart from just practical.
You also agree that they go hand in hand.
The thing is you're basically agreeing that our deeds cant just be mindless acts but are premeditated.
Haha. Really? I know Bahai try to see similarities but you also got to see differences to. Not all of us have the same compassion.
I said knowledge is motive or compassion.
Never mentioned theoretical. I just said knowledge is practice.
You keep missing it. They ARE each other. Not hand in hand. Not a reflect of. No. They are one.
No. I never said that. That is something you put together from your understanding of what I said not what I actually said. That's why interpretations arent good without having clarification first.
Killing is a deed.
Taking care of is a deed.
If I killed someone who was trying to attack me, that is immoral. Yes, self defense, sure. But the act of killing is immoral.
The reasons, motives, etc have nothing to do with it separate from the act itself.
Same thing with the lamb story you gave me. Regardless of the reasons the farmer takes care of the lamb, the act of "Taking care of someone or animal" is the motive itself.
If a killer and a non-killer saved a child from drowning and the former still felt killing is right and the latter felt it is wrong, would that change the moral action of actually saving the child...
or would you judge that child's salvation based on the motives of the people who saved them?
Until an act has been carried out the thought is still in the mind. And it can remain there for as long as is needed to reflect upon whether taking a certain course of action is wise or not.
The act is not the thought until the thought becomes a decision. The act and th decision may be the same but the thought may take on all sorts of reasoning and reflection before any decision is made.
Usually before translating a thought into an action, further reflection is required upon possible consequences of how the translation compares to the desired result. Then acting we see what are the consequences. But we think about it first before acting or should.
Through prayer and meditation.
Maybe. Maybe not. You think you might be free, but maybe, maybe not.
There is a siddhi for realised mystics who can travel like that. Consciously, not in a dream.
Justice in Hinduism comes by the way of the natural law of karma. There is no justice day, or outside force judging anyone. But you're free to believe in that if you wish. It's another indication of how alligned to Abrahamism Bahai is, and how different it is from the dharmic religions.
I think we are the real judges against ourselves. Our actions and behaviour determine our justice.
That's too vague for me. Do you pray like in Islam, like in Christianity? Are prayers in silence, or aloud in Arabic? Or in English?
What type of meditation do you do? Is it guided? How do you sit? In lotus, on a chair, lying down? Do you use mantrams?
It seems, from your answer, that the Bahai practices are just as vague as the Bahai philosophy is. The philosophy is purposefully vague, drawing hither thither from all other religions, picking and choosing, surely the actual practices are more specific? Or not?
Yes that is how karma operates. We create our own future. Many people view karma as only from the past to the present. A better view in my opinion is to realise you're creating it every day. Yes the past to present type explains 'Why is this happening to me?" but for character development purposes, the present to future is more apt. So it's like building a stone temple, for future generations, but in the case of karma, because we believe in reincarnation, it is for yourself too.
But it's not an intellectual exercise either. It's a spiritual process. We have to get rid of the ego/personality in order to build the future.
Yes we can pray like in Islam and like in Christianity or cross legged like in Buddhism. Prayers can be silent, aloud or chanting or in any language we speak.
This really struck me the other day because I have been through similar circumstances long ago and was shocked in a way to read this but agree with the truth in it.
A true Christian will not be quick to believe words which are 'pleasing to the ear'; But will check it with the Written Word.
Come on, really?
The Church meaning the body of christ-the brothers and sisters who believe the same as you do and visa versa. The Church means the People of Christ not a building or denomination.
If you are not one with that body, then I don't see how that's being part of the body of Christ when Christ in scripture says for you all to come together to make him present in his Church (the Mass/the People coming together).
that and...
That is why I am not Christian because it is wrong to pick and choose beliefs. I don't have a religion (a practice with like-minded people) for that very reason. But picking teachings from Christ, reinterpreting them through Bahaullah's eyes, not wanting to be part of his body, then recognize yourself as christian regardless if you name yourself christian or not staggers me.
He provided a way out of our tormented existence resulting from wrong choices. All we have to do is accept it.
Thanks. Good to know you're not using Hindu methods. That would undoubtedly be more confusing.
So just how does a Bahai choose what to do?
It's all up to each individual. Today is a very special Holy Day. The day Baha'u'llah announced in Baghdad that He was the Promised One. The Baha'i day begins at sunset so the holy day began last night. Baha'is come together on such ocassins and choose some readings and prayers and for an hour or two will commemorate such an event.
We also have what is a 19 Day Feast. A Baha'i calendar month is 19 days. So our year is 19 months of 19 days each. At the beginning of each Bahá'í month we come together to have devotions and consultation.
We also have a Universal spiritual educational curriculum that is practised in every country for Baha'is of all ages for children, junior youth and adults.
But all these activities are voluntary. The only obligatory devotions are the daily obligatory prayer and to read a passage at morning and evening. So a Baha'i can make it as simple or as complex as he/she wishes but moderation is highly advised by Baha'u'llah not to tire oneself out by reading too much.
Some people think they can hide or run from their karma, but they can't. We (Hindus) see ego as a very large boulder on the path. When I worked with a board of trustees, or on committees at school, any individual with a large ego wanting to do everything his or her way was just a waste of valuable time for everyone.
"christ, krishna, buddha, and muhammad have the same god"
That is what Ahmadiyya believe, and its clues are very much in Quran/Islam/Muhammad.
Regards
The Ahmadiyya is the reformation movement in Islam by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1835-1908) - the Promised Messiah, Imam Mahdi and the End Time reformer of all revealed religions. Yes, he is the Krishna in Second Coming also.
Regards
@InvestigateTruth is a Baha'i from a Muslim background who can answer all your questions. @loverofhumanity and @arthra are knowledgeable too. The Bab (forerunner to Baha'u'llah) is a Mahdi claimant too so they can't both be right.Is it mentioned in Quran? Please
If yes, then please quote from Quran in this connection.
Anybody, please
Regards