• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How are they not defaming Jesus?

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Who knows if a historical Jesus even existed. There is certainly very little consensus on what he would be like, do or say.

I am not sure that it is even possible to defame a character that may easily be fully fictional.
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
I am not sure that it is even possible to defame a character that may easily be fully fictional.
Oh, but of course it is. Take what happened recently with Marvel and Captain America. It was revealed in a massive story arc plot-twist that the (fictional) hero of the American spirit, a role model to many people and a symbol of just patriotism was a Hydra (Nazi) agent all along. It was huge, and outraging, and threw everything people knew and thought right out the window. People were genuinely angered by this, that it would even be considered and written.

I don't know the fate of that story arc, but I know that it was absolutely rejected by a lot of people. Being a purely fictional character, this is and was easy to do. But the character of Captain America was, if not for a moment, defamed and tarnished. And fictional or not, that defamation did affect quite a few people on various levels.

But I've got no clue what soviet is on about.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
But I've got no clue what soviet is on about.

It is a standard if not always lampshaded part of Islaamic doctrine that Jesus necessarily did exist and was a genuine prophet with a message from God.

At the same time, the Qur'an insists also that the Christian claims that Jesus was somehow God or God's son are entirely misguided. Similarly, it insists that the idea that God would allow his dear prophet Jesus to be crucified is nonsense.

If it sounds like a confused, even contradictory stance towards Christian beliefs, then you are not alone.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
It is a standard if not always lampshaded part of Islaamic doctrine that Jesus necessarily did exist and was a genuine prophet with a message from God.

At the same time, the Qur'an insists also that the Christian claims that Jesus was somehow God or God's son are entirely misguided. Similarly, it insists that the idea that God would allow his dear prophet Jesus to be crucified is nonsense.

If it sounds like a confused, even contradictory stance towards Christian beliefs, then you are not alone.
More to the point, Luis, is why would non-Muslims give a rat's hindquarters about what a so-called "prophet" said almost 600 years after the events took place? I can't imagine that Muhammad's stance on Jesus won him many early Christian supporters.
 

12jtartar

Active Member
Premium Member
Jesus is getting defamed daily. They paint pictures of him either holding a cross or wearing it around his neck, and then, they sell those paintings on the markets. During his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God, and none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. By producing pictures of him holding a cross and claiming that he was God is a defamation of his character. This reminds me of situation where you have a pack of wolfs ripping their pray apart. Everyone gets a little piece of it and everyone is happy. Jesus never promoted any crosses in his lifetime, and never call himself God.

How are they not defaming Jesus?

sovietchild,
You are absolutely right, but there is more to this than what you mentioned. Every time a person calls himself a Christian and then does things that God condemns, he is causing people to blaspheme the name of God, Romans 2:23,24. You cannot do that with impunity!!!
 

Jedster

Flying through space
Were you there? Do you have a time-machine we're not aware of? Because unless the answer is "yes" to either of those, I'm pretty sure you're just making baseless assumptions.
The Romans used crosses long before the time of Jesus.
People who came to Jerusalem on holiday may have bought ornaments in the shape of crosses just as I am sure one can buy a necklace with a guillotine in France.
Jesus could have been a seller of said ornaments. I mean in those days, as in these days, it's a way to make a living.:)
 

McBell

Unbound
sovietchild,
You are absolutely right, but there is more to this than what you mentioned. Every time a person calls himself a Christian and then does things that God condemns, he is causing people to blaspheme the name of God, Romans 2:23,24. You cannot do that with impunity!!!
valid point.

the thing is, who has it right?
Imagine the look on everyone's face if Jesus came back and said that Westboro Baptist Church got it right and everyone else was just plain flat out wrong?
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
Jesus is getting defamed daily. They paint pictures of him either holding a cross or wearing it around his neck, and then, they sell those paintings on the markets. During his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God, and none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. By producing pictures of him holding a cross and claiming that he was God is a defamation of his character. This reminds me of situation where you have a pack of wolfs ripping their pray apart. Everyone gets a little piece of it and everyone is happy. Jesus never promoted any crosses in his lifetime, and never call himself God.

How are they not defaming Jesus?
Maybe Jesus deserves to get defamed. Just throwing that out there.
 

McBell

Unbound
Jesus is getting defamed daily. They paint pictures of him either holding a cross or wearing it around his neck, and then, they sell those paintings on the markets. During his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God, and none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. By producing pictures of him holding a cross and claiming that he was God is a defamation of his character. This reminds me of situation where you have a pack of wolfs ripping their pray apart. Everyone gets a little piece of it and everyone is happy. Jesus never promoted any crosses in his lifetime, and never call himself God.

How are they not defaming Jesus?
define "defamed"
 

sovietchild

Well-Known Member
define "defamed"

Paint some buddy who they are not. I wonder if Jews were the ones who defamed him in the first place.

The Romans used crosses long before the time of Jesus.
People who came to Jerusalem on holiday may have bought ornaments in the shape of crosses just as I am sure one can buy a necklace with a guillotine in France.
Jesus could have been a seller of said ornaments. I mean in those days, as in these days, it's a way to make a living.:)

This can serve as defamation. There is no records of Jesus making a profit from selling crosses in the market places.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
... The Green Lantern though maybe it could be argued that Ryan Reynolds did a pretty good job of that.

Hey! I rather liked that movie. But then again, I always set the bar really low when I'm watching a comic book made into a "movie". Especially from DC.... ;)
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Paint some buddy who they are not. I wonder if Jews were the ones who defamed him in the first place.

Ah, the ever-popular recourse to suspecting Jewish People for no good reason. Muslims seem to love it. I wonder why.

Mind you, the Gospels do defame the Jewish People in, for instance, Matthew 28:15.
 

sovietchild

Well-Known Member
Ah, the ever-popular recourse to suspecting Jewish People for no good reason. Muslims seem to love it. I wonder why.

Mind you, the Gospels do defame the Jewish People in, for instance, Matthew 28:15.

Why did they chose to slay Jesus? Maybe, because he got defamed. Defamation always been around.
 

sovietchild

Well-Known Member
Are you always so casual about this rather ironic act of accusing other of being defamers?

No, but I am however currently reading a book called "narcissist you know" it talks about bullies who spread rumors about their target.

So, why do you think they chose to slay Jesus?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
I don't believe there was ever a historical Jesus as such. Everything in the Gospels and early epistles feels like alegory to me.
 
Top