YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
Unlike the writer of the OP who is just blowing smoke out of their hind-quarters.I am replying that Jesus cannot be defamed through such things as pictures and words, and I am producing references about it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Unlike the writer of the OP who is just blowing smoke out of their hind-quarters.I am replying that Jesus cannot be defamed through such things as pictures and words, and I am producing references about it.
Oh, but of course it is. Take what happened recently with Marvel and Captain America. It was revealed in a massive story arc plot-twist that the (fictional) hero of the American spirit, a role model to many people and a symbol of just patriotism was a Hydra (Nazi) agent all along. It was huge, and outraging, and threw everything people knew and thought right out the window. People were genuinely angered by this, that it would even be considered and written.I am not sure that it is even possible to defame a character that may easily be fully fictional.
What did he call him self?
But I've got no clue what soviet is on about.
More to the point, Luis, is why would non-Muslims give a rat's hindquarters about what a so-called "prophet" said almost 600 years after the events took place? I can't imagine that Muhammad's stance on Jesus won him many early Christian supporters.It is a standard if not always lampshaded part of Islaamic doctrine that Jesus necessarily did exist and was a genuine prophet with a message from God.
At the same time, the Qur'an insists also that the Christian claims that Jesus was somehow God or God's son are entirely misguided. Similarly, it insists that the idea that God would allow his dear prophet Jesus to be crucified is nonsense.
If it sounds like a confused, even contradictory stance towards Christian beliefs, then you are not alone.
Jesus is getting defamed daily. They paint pictures of him either holding a cross or wearing it around his neck, and then, they sell those paintings on the markets. During his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God, and none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. By producing pictures of him holding a cross and claiming that he was God is a defamation of his character. This reminds me of situation where you have a pack of wolfs ripping their pray apart. Everyone gets a little piece of it and everyone is happy. Jesus never promoted any crosses in his lifetime, and never call himself God.
How are they not defaming Jesus?
The Romans used crosses long before the time of Jesus.Were you there? Do you have a time-machine we're not aware of? Because unless the answer is "yes" to either of those, I'm pretty sure you're just making baseless assumptions.
valid point.sovietchild,
You are absolutely right, but there is more to this than what you mentioned. Every time a person calls himself a Christian and then does things that God condemns, he is causing people to blaspheme the name of God, Romans 2:23,24. You cannot do that with impunity!!!
Maybe Jesus deserves to get defamed. Just throwing that out there.Jesus is getting defamed daily. They paint pictures of him either holding a cross or wearing it around his neck, and then, they sell those paintings on the markets. During his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God, and none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. By producing pictures of him holding a cross and claiming that he was God is a defamation of his character. This reminds me of situation where you have a pack of wolfs ripping their pray apart. Everyone gets a little piece of it and everyone is happy. Jesus never promoted any crosses in his lifetime, and never call himself God.
How are they not defaming Jesus?
define "defamed"Jesus is getting defamed daily. They paint pictures of him either holding a cross or wearing it around his neck, and then, they sell those paintings on the markets. During his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God, and none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. By producing pictures of him holding a cross and claiming that he was God is a defamation of his character. This reminds me of situation where you have a pack of wolfs ripping their pray apart. Everyone gets a little piece of it and everyone is happy. Jesus never promoted any crosses in his lifetime, and never call himself God.
How are they not defaming Jesus?
define "defamed"
The Romans used crosses long before the time of Jesus.
People who came to Jerusalem on holiday may have bought ornaments in the shape of crosses just as I am sure one can buy a necklace with a guillotine in France.
Jesus could have been a seller of said ornaments. I mean in those days, as in these days, it's a way to make a living.
... The Green Lantern though maybe it could be argued that Ryan Reynolds did a pretty good job of that.
Hey! I rather liked that movie. But then again, I always set the bar really low when I'm watching a comic book made into a "movie". Especially from DC....
Paint some buddy who they are not. I wonder if Jews were the ones who defamed him in the first place.
This just in, Christians the world over think that Jesus is their buddy, when in reality he's just their guy.Paint some buddy who they are not.
Ah, the ever-popular recourse to suspecting Jewish People for no good reason. Muslims seem to love it. I wonder why.
Mind you, the Gospels do defame the Jewish People in, for instance, Matthew 28:15.
Are you always so casual about this rather ironic act of accusing other of being defamers?Why did they chose to slay Jesus? Maybe, because he got defamed. Defamation always been around.
Are you always so casual about this rather ironic act of accusing other of being defamers?