Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why don't you see the figurative?Oxen aren't on crosses.
For if the blood of goats and oxen and the ashes of a young cow, sprinkled on the defiled, sanctifies to purity of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, cleanse your consciences from dead works to serve the living God!Goats are also sacrifices. None is ultimate.
Why don't you see how ridiculous the figurative you invent is?Why don't you see the figurative?
I'll quote Harry Potter if you'd like. Or maybe some Hamlet. It is about as relevant.For if the blood of goats and oxen and the ashes of a young cow, sprinkled on the defiled, sanctifies to purity of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, cleanse your consciences from dead works to serve the living God!
Heb. 9:13-14
This doesn't say that God can become a man.God in His divine nature cannot die, but God in His human nature he could. YHWH became man, and as man he was crucified.
Zech 12:10 And I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem the spirit of grace and supplication; and they will look upon me whom they have pierced, and they will mourn over him like the mourning over the only son, and bitterly grieve over him as one bitterly grieves over the firstborn.
This isn't very convincing. You'll need something stronger than a chart on a website to change the name of the letter from Aleph to El.Yes, the original name of the first letter was El. Hebrew Alphabet Chart |
You're claiming that God is symbolically called an Ox, but your link doesn't show that at all. Where on the link does it say that? In fact, the link makes a stronger case to claim the opposite. Besides, if you're claiming that Jesus was an Ox, then that weakens the claim that Jesus was the lamb led to slaughter in Isaiah 53:7. So which is it? Is Jesus a lamb or an ox?In the Hebrew language, God is symbolic called an ox for its strength. Also because the ox was used as a sacrifice in the Tanakh God is called an ox for God is the final and ultimate sacrifice. He is the ox on the cross.
God is of course not literally an ox. God is also called lion, leopard, bear, and rock in the Tanakh, but only symbolic and not literally.
This doesn't say that God can become a man.
And yet, anytime the Tanach talks about the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob, it always uses the singular.Elohim is a plural word. The Jewish word Elohim hints at the Trinity. It's the plural form of the word eloah. The word Elohim is in the very first sentence of the Bible.
If you'd like to discuss it, please quote the verse and look for the name of God in the verse. If I recall correctly the verse says "messanger".God became a man when he appeared to Abraham in the tent. The Bible doesn't describe Abraham's experience as a vision. Abraham plead to God for Sodom and Gommorah. He had a relationship with God. It wasnt a vision.
You don't know much of Hebrew, do you?Elohim is a plural word. The Jewish word Elohim hints at the Trinity. It's the plural form of the word eloah. The word Elohim is in the very first sentence of the Bible.
Are you looking for a figurative Messiah or a real one?Why don't you see the figurative
Why don't you see that this is circular reasoning?For if the blood of goats and oxen and the ashes of a young cow, sprinkled on the defiled, sanctifies to purity of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, cleanse your consciences from dead works to serve the living God!
Heb. 9:13-14
Not as a godperson equal to the other two.
Adam, of course, was not a Christian, but you might want to look at Luke 3:38.
What are the differences?
And yet, anytime the Tanach talks about the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob, it always uses the singular.
You don't know much of Hebrew, do you?
The word elohim can be a singular or a plural. One looks at the verb, pronoun or adjective to see. In the first sentence of the bible, the verb is in the singular so the noun is in the singular.
Yes, that verse has a plural, but it isn't involved with the word elohim. The text readsIn the Bible verse let us make man in our image, Elohim is used in the plural. The verse about God creating the heaven and the earth does not reference Elohim.
Yes, that verse has a plural, but it isn't involved with the word elohim. The text reads
And Elohim said "Let us make man in our image". Elohim is still singular (as evidenced by the "said" verb which is in the singular). If I say to my class "let's make ice cream sundaes that we can eat" I am still singular.
If you'd like to discuss it, please quote the verse and look for the name of God in the verse. If I recall correctly the verse says "messanger".
No, it is not a plural word. It is a word which can be plural and can be singular. When it is used as a singular, it is singular. When it is used as a plural, it is plural. English has words like this also:Elohim itself is a plural word. There doesn't have to be a mention of the Trinity for there to be a plural word.