Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well if you are a true follower of christ we should be trying to follow the example that was set for us.@Paul Chavez did you mean to say it is I who am starting a movement for myself?
Oh boy! I can hear the laughter!
By the way matthew 24:14 this good news of the kingdom will be preached. Then the end will come. Matthew 28:19 and many more passages. We follow christ example, and he preached the good news of the kingdom.@Paul Chavez did you mean to say it is I who am starting a movement for myself?
Oh boy! I can hear the laughter!
By whom? Who set the example?Well if you are a true follower of christ we should be trying to follow the example that was set for us.
Somebody tells them. You should not believe your teachers who say that there is only one right way to know John 3:16.As for the john 3:16, how do people come to know this information?
Jesus made no disciples.By the way matthew 24:14 this good news of the kingdom will be preached. Then the end will come. Matthew 28:19 and many more passages. We follow christ example, and he preached the good news of the kingdom.
I'm sure there is people that read John 3:16 and their life was affected, but it's a relationship that builds your faith not just John 3:16. The whole idea of why Jesus came to die for our sins and getting to know why it seems as though Yahweh was mean in the Hebrew scriptures is such an awesome experience that is.By whom? Who set the example?
Somebody tells them. You should not believe your teachers who say that there is only one right way to know John 3:16.
I agree to a certain point. But the truth is the truth, even if I didn't like the person and they have a point no problem.If someone is told about John 3:16 by someone who is at work doing so and the person telling it is not friendly or likable it is not so effective as hearing it come from a friendly and free person. Agree?
Is it the truth that Jesus appointed the governing body to feed everybody righteousness at the table of Jehovah?I agree to a certain point. But the truth is the truth, even if I didn't like the person and they have a point no problem.
But see, here's the problem. Modern Bibles say John 17:3 says "know". But look it up and you will see to know is much too simple a word to explain what Jesus meant.. http://biblehub.com/greek/1097.htmHere is my problem and a reality we face
1. Every christian should be glorifying YHWH and Jesus.
2. Many attach certain things to god and his son.
3. For many people it does not matter what John 3:16 because of the misunderstandings of the god of the old testament.
4. John 17:3 would also go with John 3:16, we can't isolate passages.
Yes, "God" thought him worthy to be added to the Bible. You're quoting a Catholic whom WT condemns. There is a difference. How in the world can you quote someone as having truth when you condemn everything they stand for?
Well I will definitely say that Jehovah selects individuals to do his will. The governing body is sanctifying gods name better in comparison to other religions, in my opinion. When we are talking about magnitude.Is it the truth that Jesus appointed the governing body to feed everybody righteousness at the table of Jehovah?
But see, here's the problem. Modern Bibles say John 17:3 says "know". But look it up and you will see to know is much too simple a word to explain what Jesus meant.. http://biblehub.com/greek/1097.htm
Matthew 7:14
I believe God selects individuals to use and accomplishes something through them.Is it the truth that Jesus appointed the governing body to feed everybody righteousness at the table of Jehovah?
But see, here's the problem. Modern Bibles say John 17:3 says "know". But look it up and you will see to know is much too simple a word to explain what Jesus meant.. http://biblehub.com/greek/1097.htm
Matthew 7:14
Sanctify is not the same as popularize. They are somewhat of opposite meaning.Well I will definitely say that Jehovah selects individuals to do his will. The governing body is sanctifying gods name better in comparison to other religions, in my opinion. When we are talking about magnitude.
I do study the greek and look and lexicons. Read our translation in the 2013 NWT. Coming to know you is more proper.
Sanctifying gods name was part of Jesus prayers matthew 6:9.
John 4:11 Peter 2:21. Jesus made no disciple. Not even one.
1 John 2:6 Jesus made not one disciple.
John 13:15
Regardless who else even speaks about Jehovah on the same level?Sanctify is not the same as popularize. They are somewhat of opposite meaning.
First of all, that scripture is about what the Pharisees thought he was doing not what Jesus said he was doing. Secondly, the meaning does not convey that he was transforming people, but that they were going to him despite the Pharisees' warning.John 4:1
Jehovah has given all authority to God's son. How much do you speak of him?Regardless who else even speaks about Jehovah on the same level?
Yes. But the questions are these.First of all, that scripture is about what the Pharisees thought he was doing not what Jesus said he was doing. Secondly, the meaning does not convey that he was transforming people, but that they were going to him despite the Pharisees' warning.