How can you be a True Christian™ if you don't take the Eden story literally?

[dybmh]

Oh please pay attention.

To your infantile intellect. No problem. It's like watching a toddler toddle. Maybe visit a library. Start in the childrens section and com back when you're advanced to young adult.

Don't forget the "Choose your own adventure books". They defeat that nonsense atheist "but, but free-will, can't be, cause reasons"

 

[Subduction Zone]

Pay attention to what? You did not answer the question: How can something come from nothing?

I don't know. Only theists claim that. Ask them.

 

[dybmh]

But you cannot reason rationally. You were given a rational y. If you did not understand it you should ask questions.

Says the blind man stumbling around looking for his rear-end.

Here's a reason. You have no credible or important arguments to make. When you come up with one, please return and I will happily hand them to you ground and reprocessed for disposal where they belong.

 

[Subduction Zone]

but how did natural come into being?

What? You are making less and less sense. It appears that "natural" always existed.

 

[Trailblazer]

But you cannot reason rationally. You were given a rational y.

That is deflection, a common atheist tactic. Throw it back on me when you cannot answer my questions....
This is not my first rodeo, been doing this for 10.5 years.

If you did not understand it you should ask questions.

I did ask questions but I got no answers.

 

[dybmh]

I don't know. Only theists claim that. Ask them.

^^ Deaf dumb and blind.... do you know how to play pinball?

 

[dybmh]

but how did natural come into being?

a one sentence argument, takes only one sentence to defeat. bah-bye atheism

 

[Subduction Zone]

To your infantile intellect. No problem. It's like watching a toddler toddle. Maybe visit a library. Start in the childrens section and com back when you're advanced to young adult.

Don't forget the "Choose your own adventure books". They defeat that nonsense atheist "but, but free-will, can't be, cause reasons"

You can't refute someone with "infantile" arguments. You are projecting again. All that your argument demonstrated was your own lacks.

 

[Trailblazer]

What? You are making less and less sense. It appears that "natural" always existed.

Appears to whom? Have any scientists ever proven that?

 

[dybmh]

You can't refute someone with "infantile" arguments. You are projecting again. All that your argument demonstrated was your own lacks.

You're back from the library so soon? Please present to class? Here I'll get you started, since you look like you need help.

A
B
C
D

Do you like green eggs and ham?

Oh, you didn't go to the library to build up those brains of yours? Please go do that, and come back when you have something intelligent to share.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That is deflection, a common atheist tactic. Throw it back on me when you cannot answer my questions....
This is not my first rodeo, been doing this for 10.5 years.

I did ask questions but I got no answers.

No, you have been given endless answers. You refuse to understand them. And please don't accuse others of what you are guilty of.

 

[Trailblazer]

I don't know. Only theists claim that. Ask them.

Which theists claim that something came from nothing?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Appears to whom? Have any scientists ever proven that?

Anyone that has studied nature.

And there is no "proof" in science. Scientists are surprisingly open to the possibility of a god. But the burden of proof ( and that refers to who must provide evidence ) are those that claim a god exists. So far they have not provided any rational reliable evidence.

 

[Trailblazer]

No, you have been given endless answers. You refuse to understand them.

More deflection and evasion.

And please don't accuse others of what you are guilty of.

You are projecting, unless you can show me a post where I did not answer a question someone asked me.

 

[dybmh]

No, you have been given endless answers. You refuse to understand them. And please don't accuse others of what you are guilty of.

No... you refuse to read them. remember. 119 words, a short paragraph is too much for you. And if it's not that, its some ther excuse. All you have are excuses. This forum is for intelligent conversation, not whining. I think there's an atheist-dir for that. Or perhaps go hide in the eros room. Or, isn't there an atheist hide-y hole you could scurry off to to lick your ... wounds.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Which theists claim that something came from nothing?

Most Christians. There is even a Latin term for it. Creation ex nihilo. Many Abrahamic religions share that belief.

 

[Subduction Zone]

More deflection and evasion.

You are projecting, unless you can show me a post where I did not answer a question someone asked me.

If you can't be honest then there is no point having a discussion with you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No... you refuse to read them. remember. 119 words, a short paragraph is too much for you. And if it's not that, its some ther excuse. All you have are excuses. This forum is for intelligent conversation, not whining. I think there's an atheist-dir for that. Or perhaps go hide in the eros room. Or, isn't there an atheist hide-y hole you could scurry off to to lick your ... wounds.

I read it. It was nonsense. I even explained to you why it failed. More than once.

 

[dybmh]

Anyone that has studied nature.

Irrrrrrrrelevant in a theological debate. Your science is meaningless. no one cares about it. It's only useful for puffing up the atheist cavity where your Christian heart used to be.

And there is no "proof" in science.

Good. Then. you just defeated your own argument. the debate will never be over. What a stupid thing to say. Are you practicing cowardly-faux-buddhism also?

Scientists are surprisingly open to the possibility of a god.

Well then. Why are you being so unscientific?

But the burden of proof ( and that refers to who must provide evidence ) are those that claim a god exists. So far they have not provided any rational reliable evidence.

There is no burden of proof in modal logic. All of your faux-atheist gotchas are modal logic. There is no burden. Wake up and smell the coffee. Those faux-atheist arguments are all done.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Irrrrrrrrelevant in a theological debate. Your science is meaningless. no one cares about it. It's only useful for puffing up the atheist cavity where your Christian heart used to be.



Good. Then. you just defeated your own argument. the bebate will never be over. What a stupid thing to say. Are you a cowardly-faux-buddhist also?



Well then. Why are you being so unscientific?



There is no burden of proof in modal logic. All of your faux-atheist gotchas are modal logic. There is no burden. Wake up and smell the coffee. Those faux-atheist arguments are all done.

LOL!! You started off with the same old error.


Try again.