How can you be a True Christian™ if you don't take the Eden story literally?

[dybmh]

Clearly true, but if it was it only supports my claim of you ignoring refutations.

ignored.

 

[dybmh]

Who said it came into being?

If it didn't come into being, then the claim that God is immoral is false. If there is no agency, then there is agent to criticise. Your post is completely out of context and irelevant.

 

[dybmh]

Clearly not true, but even if you did ignore that post it only supports my claim of you ignoring refutations.

ignored

 

[Subduction Zone]

You have done nothing so there was nothing for me to deny. That is just a ploy to get me off your back since you have no evidence of me evading anything people say.
Which others? @dybmh already said I am not guilty of evasion. If the atheists here are honest they know I never evade anything. I don't even have anyone on ignore!

What? Really? Then what were you complaining about? You just did what you are accused of doing.

 

[Trailblazer]

There is no evidence for you. There is plenty of evidence for those who have looked with wise eyes and understood truth.

If there is 'plenty of evidence' it should not be difficult to produce it.
That is just more evasion. Any just person can see that.

 

[dybmh]

What? Really? Then what were you complaining about? You just did what you are accused of doing.

nope.

 

[Subduction Zone]

If it didn't come into being, then the claim that God is immoral is false. If there is no agency, then there is agent to criticise. Your post is completely out of context and irelevant.

Wow! You still do not understand how a hypothetical can be used in a debate.

 

[Subduction Zone]

nope.

That only works if one has made substantive posts.

 

[dybmh]

How did what originate? Are you asking a creationist question?

you claimed that the physical laws came from the universe. now you don't know what you're talking about? is this more faux-buddism?

 

[dybmh]

Wow! You still do not understand how a hypothetical can be used in a debate.

asked and answered

hypothetically, if there is no creation, there is nothing immoral about God
hypothetically, if there is no agent creating, there is nothing immoral about the agent

 

[Trailblazer]

The one answer we can give right now is that it appears to have always been that way. And the concept of before then does not exist.

Isn't that what I said in the post where I quoted Baha'u'llah? Creation has always existed.

 

[Subduction Zone]

If there is 'plenty of evidence' it should not be difficult to produce it.
That is just more evasion. Any just person can see that.

Others are onto you too. Your game won't work with them. I told you that I was not the only one that noticed this behavior of yours.

 

[dybmh]

That only works if one has made substantive posts.

ignored.

 

[ppp]

If there is 'plenty of evidence' it should not be difficult to produce it.
That is just more evasion. Any just person can see that.

It's all in the Messages of the Forum. Go read and you will see. If your spleen is true.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You have done nothing so there was nothing for me to deny. That is just a ploy to get me off your back since you have no evidence of me evading anything people say.
Which others? @dybmh already said I am not guilty of evasion. If the atheists here are honest they know I never evade anything. I don't even have anyone on ignore!

The one person supporting you is evidence against you. Look at his posts. And no, we all know that you evade all sorts of things.

Just try and stop doing that for a while. That is all that I ask.

 

[dybmh]

Others are onto you too. Your game won't work with them. I told you that I was not the only one that noticed this behavior of yours.

no... those are posters with the same faux-atheist devotion to the same faux-athiest god you are prostrating to you in this debate.

they're not noticing anything except that you need some backup. against two intelligent and persistent individuals. But of course, faux-atheism cannot bring anything intelligent by defintion. it's nothing but a void.

 

[Trailblazer]

What? Really? Then what were you complaining about? You just did what you are accused of doing.

Try to stay on task. I am not denying anything because there is nothing for me to deny since I did not do what you accused me of - evasion.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Isn't that what I said in the post where I quoted Baha'u'llah? Creation has always existed.

Yes, it is and if the thread was not moving so fast I would have given you clearer credit for that.

But be careful of words like "creation". That term places a burden of proof upon you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

no... those are posters with the same faux-atheist devotion to the same faux-athiest god you are prostrating to you in this debate.

they're not noticing anything except that you need some backup. against two intelligent and persistent individuals. But of course, faux-atheism cannot bring anything intelligent by defintion. it's nothing but a void.

More false claims that you can't support.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Try to stay on task. I am not denying anything because there is nothing for me to deny since I did not do what you accused me of - evasion.

When you deny the obvious you are the one taking us off track.