How can you be a True Christian™ if you don't take the Eden story literally?

[Subduction Zone]

not true. as usual. faux-atheism at its finest... worst... least... whatever

You were not involved in that thread so how would you know?

 

[dybmh]

No, ignorant people making false accusations does not make one notorious.

Yup. They do. Woh. Such deep interactions. Your religious beliefs and gods you're promoting are so... inspiring.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yup. They do. Woh. Such deep interactions. Your religious beliefs and gods you're promoting are so... inspiring.

Projection. I am the one without religious beliefs.

 

[dybmh]

You were not involved in that thread so how would you know?

As far as I can tell, you have again lost track of the topic of the convo. like I said, you seem to need to build up some intellectual fortitude.

I've heard that excessive self-pleasure diminishes a person's ability to think straight and follow converstations. Maybe give that a rest? And then come return to the thread, and I'll let you know if I notice any additional brain power resulting from adaquate blood flow to the brain.

 

[Trailblazer]

Refusing to honor a demand that would do no good is not deflection.

That is the worst case of deflection I have ever seen...
That you think it would 'do no good' is not the real reason you won't present the evidence.
You won't present it because there is nothing to present.
Why not just present the evidence or admit you are wrong and move on.

Judge to prosecutor: Can you present the evidence that the accused is guilty?
Prosecutor to judge: I have evidence but it would do no good to present it.

And yes, in the "evidence for god" thread this occurred endlessly.

Then you should be able to find it and present it - me evading questions that were asked of me.

P.S. Me not providing evidence for God that you accept as evidence of God is not me evading peoples' questions.
Everyone on this forum knows I am always presenting 'what I believe is evidence for God' whenever I am asked what it is:
Messengers of God

If you don't believe it is true then ignore it. If you are not guilty of this people will stop pointing out your past.

Why should I ignore false accusations?

 

[dybmh]

Projection. I am the one without religious beliefs.

HAH! You are absolutely dogmatic, faithful in the nonsense you pump out. You worship a void, a cavity in your chest where your Christian heart used to be. It's always hungry, it's never satisfied. It needs to repeatedly preach about faux-atheism, and recruit. It needs to pleasure itself both physically emotionally intellectually, you are a living breathing vessel for a god which you are invoking here in every post.

 

[F1fan]

Isn't that what I said in the post where I quoted Baha'u'llah? Creation has always existed.

Creation is a religious concept in that context, and isn’t based in fact.

 

[dybmh]

Creation is a religious concept in that context, and isn’t based in fact.

So what? If the claim from the faux-atheist is God can't be because the world is... then the faux atheist claim is void, as usual, if they deny that creation is from God.

 

[Subduction Zone]

As far as I can tell, you have again lost track of the topic of the convo. like I said, you seem to need to build up some intellectual fortitude.

I've heard that excessive self-pleasure diminishes a person's ability to think straight and follow converstations. Maybe give that a rest? And then come return to the thread, and I'll let you know if I notice any additional brain power resulting from adaquate blood flow to the brain.

Oh my. More projection.

When you refuse to argue rationally, as you do you will only convince yourself.

 

[Trailblazer]

Creation is a religious concept in that context, and isn’t based in fact.

That's true.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So what? If the claim from the faux-atheist is God can't be because the world is... then the faux atheist claim is void, as usual, if they deny that creation is from God.

Let's watch the name calling. No one has claimed that you are pretending at your beliefs. You are clearly breaking the rules with that claim.

And no atheist has claimed to refute god. Now your version of god may have been refuted, but that doesn't mean all versions of God have been refuted.

 

[Subduction Zone]

HAH! You are absolutely dogmatic, faithful in the nonsense you pump out. You worship a void, a cavity in your chest where your Christian heart used to be. It's always hungry, it's never satisfied. It needs to repeatedly preach about faux-atheism, and recruit. It needs to pleasure itself both physically emotionally intellectually, you are a living breathing vessel for a god which you are invoking here in every post.

No, I merely reason rationally. Just because you are wrong is no excuse to name call.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That is the worst case of deflection I have ever seen...
That you think it would 'do no good' is not the real reason you won't present the evidence.
You won't present it because there is nothing to present.
Why not just present the evidence or admit you are wrong and move on.

Judge to prosecutor: Can you present the evidence that the accused is guilty?
Prosecutor to judge: I have evidence but it would do no good to present it.

Then you should be able to find it and present it - me evading questions that were asked of me.

P.S. Me not providing evidence for God that you accept as evidence of God is not me evading peoples' questions.
Everyone on this forum knows I am always presenting 'what I believe is evidence for God' whenever I am asked what it is:
Messengers of God

Why should I ignore false accusations?

And that was explained to you countless tines by many posters not to be evidence.

Your court of law analogy doesn't work because you were "found guilty" a long time ago.

 

[dybmh]

Oh my. More projection.

When you refuse to argue rationally, as you do you will only convince yourself.

ignored

 

[Subduction Zone]

ignored

I doubt if you are. You simply have no response.

You should at least try to make a logical argument.

 

[dybmh]

Let's watch the name calling. No one has claimed that you are pretending at your beliefs. You are clearly breaking the rules with that claim.

actually no it's not.

And no atheist has claimed to refute god. Now your version of god may have been refuted, but that doesn't mean all versions of God have been refuted.

not true. you can't kep track of the conversation or the claims being made, and even if you could you would flip and twist them and pretend you didn's say them in a dazzling ( sarcastic ) display of faux-atheism.

 

[dybmh]

I doubt if you are. You simply have no response.

You should at least try to make a logical argument.

ignored.

what you say has to have some truth to it for it to have any effect on me.

 

[dybmh]

No, I merely reason rationally. Just because you are wrong is no excuse to name call.

What ever I'm saying is only insulting if it is true.

You defintely do not reason rationally. Making a hypothetical about God, then undermining it immediately is proof of the religious beliefs and god you ignorantly serve.

 

[dybmh]

And that was explained to you countless tines by many posters not to be evidence.

Your court of law analogy doesn't work because you were "found guilty" a long time ago.

Dude! The fact that what YOU'RE saying is not evidence is the reason that your argument fails.

 

[Subduction Zone]

actually no it's not.



not true. you can't kep track of the conversation or the claims being made, and even if you could you would flip and twist them and pretend you didn's say them in a dazzling ( sarcastic ) display of faux-atheism.

actually no it's not.



not true. you can't kep track of the conversation or the claims being made, and even if you could you would flip and twist them and pretend you didn's say them in a dazzling ( sarcastic ) display of faux-atheism.

Perhaps you were the confused one? You have demonstrated that time and again with my arguments.

Also do you think that it would be okay if others called you a "fake Jew"? I am not going to, but I wonder how you would react if someone did that to you.