dybmh
דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
ignored.Clearly true, but if it was it only supports my claim of you ignoring refutations.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
ignored.Clearly true, but if it was it only supports my claim of you ignoring refutations.
Who said it came into being?
ignoredClearly not true, but even if you did ignore that post it only supports my claim of you ignoring refutations.
What? Really? Then what were you complaining about? You just did what you are accused of doing.You have done nothing so there was nothing for me to deny. That is just a ploy to get me off your back since you have no evidence of me evading anything people say.
Which others? @dybmh already said I am not guilty of evasion. If the atheists here are honest they know I never evade anything. I don't even have anyone on ignore!
If there is 'plenty of evidence' it should not be difficult to produce it.There is no evidence for you. There is plenty of evidence for those who have looked with wise eyes and understood truth.
What? Really? Then what were you complaining about? You just did what you are accused of doing.
Wow! You still do not understand how a hypothetical can be used in a debate.If it didn't come into being, then the claim that God is immoral is false. If there is no agency, then there is agent to criticise. Your post is completely out of context and irelevant.
That only works if one has made substantive posts.nope.
How did what originate? Are you asking a creationist question?
asked and answeredWow! You still do not understand how a hypothetical can be used in a debate.
Isn't that what I said in the post where I quoted Baha'u'llah? Creation has always existed.The one answer we can give right now is that it appears to have always been that way. And the concept of before then does not exist.
If there is 'plenty of evidence' it should not be difficult to produce it.
That is just more evasion. Any just person can see that.
That only works if one has made substantive posts.
It's all in the Messages of the Forum. Go read and you will see. If your spleen is true.If there is 'plenty of evidence' it should not be difficult to produce it.
That is just more evasion. Any just person can see that.
The one person supporting you is evidence against you. Look at his posts. And no, we all know that you evade all sorts of things.You have done nothing so there was nothing for me to deny. That is just a ploy to get me off your back since you have no evidence of me evading anything people say.
Which others? @dybmh already said I am not guilty of evasion. If the atheists here are honest they know I never evade anything. I don't even have anyone on ignore!
Others are onto you too. Your game won't work with them. I told you that I was not the only one that noticed this behavior of yours.
Try to stay on task. I am not denying anything because there is nothing for me to deny since I did not do what you accused me of - evasion.What? Really? Then what were you complaining about? You just did what you are accused of doing.
Yes, it is and if the thread was not moving so fast I would have given you clearer credit for that.Isn't that what I said in the post where I quoted Baha'u'llah? Creation has always existed.
More false claims that you can't support.no... those are posters with the same faux-atheist devotion to the same faux-athiest god you are prostrating to you in this debate.
they're not noticing anything except that you need some backup. against two intelligent and persistent individuals. But of course, faux-atheism cannot bring anything intelligent by defintion. it's nothing but a void.
When you deny the obvious you are the one taking us off track.Try to stay on task. I am not denying anything because there is nothing for me to deny since I did not do what you accused me of - evasion.