• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How can you be a True Christian™ if you don't take the Eden story literally?

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
Who said it came into being?

If it didn't come into being, then the claim that God is immoral is false. If there is no agency, then there is agent to criticise. Your post is completely out of context and irelevant.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You have done nothing so there was nothing for me to deny. That is just a ploy to get me off your back since you have no evidence of me evading anything people say.
Which others? @dybmh already said I am not guilty of evasion. If the atheists here are honest they know I never evade anything. I don't even have anyone on ignore!
What? Really? Then what were you complaining about? You just did what you are accused of doing.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
There is no evidence for you. There is plenty of evidence for those who have looked with wise eyes and understood truth.
If there is 'plenty of evidence' it should not be difficult to produce it.
That is just more evasion. Any just person can see that.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
If it didn't come into being, then the claim that God is immoral is false. If there is no agency, then there is agent to criticise. Your post is completely out of context and irelevant.
Wow! You still do not understand how a hypothetical can be used in a debate.
 

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
How did what originate? Are you asking a creationist question?

you claimed that the physical laws came from the universe. now you don't know what you're talking about? is this more faux-buddism?
 

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
Wow! You still do not understand how a hypothetical can be used in a debate.
asked and answered

hypothetically, if there is no creation, there is nothing immoral about God
hypothetically, if there is no agent creating, there is nothing immoral about the agent
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You have done nothing so there was nothing for me to deny. That is just a ploy to get me off your back since you have no evidence of me evading anything people say.
Which others? @dybmh already said I am not guilty of evasion. If the atheists here are honest they know I never evade anything. I don't even have anyone on ignore!
The one person supporting you is evidence against you. Look at his posts. And no, we all know that you evade all sorts of things.

Just try and stop doing that for a while. That is all that I ask.
 

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
Others are onto you too. Your game won't work with them. I told you that I was not the only one that noticed this behavior of yours.

no... those are posters with the same faux-atheist devotion to the same faux-athiest god you are prostrating to you in this debate.

they're not noticing anything except that you need some backup. against two intelligent and persistent individuals. But of course, faux-atheism cannot bring anything intelligent by defintion. it's nothing but a void.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Isn't that what I said in the post where I quoted Baha'u'llah? Creation has always existed.
Yes, it is and if the thread was not moving so fast I would have given you clearer credit for that.

But be careful of words like "creation". That term places a burden of proof upon you.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
no... those are posters with the same faux-atheist devotion to the same faux-athiest god you are prostrating to you in this debate.

they're not noticing anything except that you need some backup. against two intelligent and persistent individuals. But of course, faux-atheism cannot bring anything intelligent by defintion. it's nothing but a void.
More false claims that you can't support.
 
Top