I explained to you why that is appropriate, but you declined to discuss the matter. For you, empiricism begins with the world outside of the body. I include my body. Wisdom is the acquisition of information about how reality works from the individual perspective including what brings lasting satisfaction or as close as we can achieve that. I discovered empirically that strawberries taste good to me and that Brussels sprouts don't. Those experiences are reproducible and predictable notwithstanding that they are subjective. And that information is certainly at least as useful as knowing how to drive a car.That user is a subjectivist as he includes subjective experinces in empiricism if I recalled correctly.
I've also explained why I don't consider objective reality as important as one's subjective reality. It's the other way around. The former is what we imagine lies outside of the mind and which we try to represent as a mental map. Its value is in helping control that inner experience. You've got that reversed. You seem to see subjectivity as flawed or inferior to objectivity.
You don't upset me. You confuse me and seem to confuse yourself.And because he doesn't like that I point that out I have put him on ignore, so I don't answer his posts and upset him.
And I don't mind being on your ignore list.