Doesn't matter if we understand the context or not.
Ah but we do. maybe you dont
The story can still have a meaning, it can still mean something to the people reading it
And I never stated differently [insert facepalm here]
And really, you butcher it just as much with your own version that makes sense to you.
facepalm again, I have never given my full version for you to make such a incorrect ASsumption
you butcher it by focusing on it just as a myth
it is a myth, but im not focusing on that at all. thats not what this thread is about before you went off topic.
as tale written by an author
You mean multiple authors, and multiple compilations and redactions, after using a Mesopotamian legend to begin with.
while ignoring what it means.
Your just being useless at this point
if you spent as much time critiquing youself as you do others, you would get the respect you deserve. Dont let your ego write checks you cant cash.
Im trying to get another member here to view the writings more in line with how it was written, then a christian version based on a literalish reading. I have never ignored the original context and have preached the beauty of its original contents.
The serpent may not be Satan,
you were fine there without all the other dribble
but he is still some sort of adversary
No, false
Not a advasary except if one stretches imagination. AND not in the context of the advasary as in ha-satan
plenty of people do not follow what god states yet they are not advasaries
Because he is going directly against what God wanted. And for that, it is cursed
God punished him, as he plays magic sky daddy with all people and punishes them at will for mistakes far less then the snake.