How did the Egyptians build the pyramids?

[Jimmy]

If a man could walk up a smooth sided pyramid he would slide down. You can't walk up so steep a slope. You can't drag stones on slopes even approaching so steep.

Pyramids were stepped first then covered with limestone from the top down.

 

[cladking]

The pyramids were covered with a limestone casing to make the sides smooth.

If a man could walk up a smooth sided pyramid he would slide down. You can't walk up so steep a slope. You can't drag stones on slopes even approaching so steep.

 

[cladking]

Pyramids were stepped first then covered with limestone from the top down.

Yes. The sides of the steps were 70 degrees.

You can't walk up 70 degrees either.

 

[Jimmy]

Yes. The sides of the steps were 70 degrees.

You can't walk up 70 degrees either.

 

[cladking]

Yes. The sides of the steps were 70 degrees.

Ironically they were also about 135 degrees because the desert heat is extreme and the blistering sun will make it like an oven with heat radiating from the stones. So 50 men dragging stones up a 70 degree side is your story and you're sticking to it.

This is where Egyptologists usually evoke the power of superstition to do anything at all.

 

[cladking]

https://www.religiousforums.com/attachments/img_7071-jpeg.100475/

The person who drew this was no scientist. The ropes aren't even attached to the load because there's no means to attach a single line. Those pulling from behind are doing nothing because the coefficient of friction between rope and wood is so high that they are just puling the post.

Not only is there no evidence of ramps at Giza but there is no evidence they had ramps with posts in the way of the workers. This is just nonsense dreamed up by Egyptologists trying to save their precious ramps. First they dumped water on sand to hold them down and then Lehner banished thousands of workers to hold them down at night by simply invoking the phrase "they mustta slept on them". It just goes on and on. I debunked ramps, all ramps, back in 2010 based on logic and evidenc4e and have already proven (shown) that stones were pulled up one step at a time from above. It doesn't matter any longer what any Egyptologist believes because they aren't even allowed to see the evidence. Hawass will not allow publication of the infrared study so their opinion is moot. Professional opinion is now based on old evidence. This is a simple fact and no spell or incantation can change this fact.

Egyptology has gone the way of the horse and buggy. Soon enough they will be a punchline for jokes.

 

[cladking]

Egyptology has gone the way of the horse and buggy. Soon enough they will be a punchline for jokes.

I predicted the results of the infrared study and campaigned for years to get Egyptology to allow real scientists to come in and do it. Now it's been another ten years since the study was done but Zahi Hawass won't allow even Egyptologists to see it because he thinks "it might confuse the public".

He's right. It will confuse them right into seeing the facts. It will confuse them awake.

 

[Jimmy]

https://www.religiousforums.com/attachments/img_7071-jpeg.100475/

The person who drew this was no scientist. The ropes aren't even attached to the load because there's no means to attach a single line. Those pulling from behind are doing nothing because the coefficient of friction between rope and wood is so high that they are just puling the post.

Not only is there no evidence of ramps at Giza but there is no evidence they had ramps with posts in the way of the workers. This is just nonsense dreamed up by Egyptologists trying to save their precious ramps. First they dumped water on sand to hold them down and then Lehner banished thousands of workers to hold them down at night by simply invoking the phrase "they mustta slept on them". It just goes on and on. I debunked ramps, all ramps, back in 2010 based on logic and evidenc4e and have already proven (shown) that stones were pulled up one step at a time from above. It doesn't matter any longer what any Egyptologist believes because they aren't even allowed to see the evidence. Hawass will not allow publication of the infrared study so their opinion is moot. Professional opinion is now based on old evidence. This is a simple fact and no spell or incantation can change this fact.

Egyptology has gone the way of the horse and buggy. Soon enough they will be a punchline for jokes.

Nah. 50 men. Cakewalk

 

[Jimmy]

https://www.religiousforums.com/attachments/img_7071-jpeg.100475/

The person who drew this was no scientist. The ropes aren't even attached to the load because there's no means to attach a single line. Those pulling from behind are doing nothing because the coefficient of friction between rope and wood is so high that they are just puling the post.

Not only is there no evidence of ramps at Giza but there is no evidence they had ramps with posts in the way of the workers. This is just nonsense dreamed up by Egyptologists trying to save their precious ramps. First they dumped water on sand to hold them down and then Lehner banished thousands of workers to hold them down at night by simply invoking the phrase "they mustta slept on them". It just goes on and on. I debunked ramps, all ramps, back in 2010 based on logic and evidenc4e and have already proven (shown) that stones were pulled up one step at a time from above. It doesn't matter any longer what any Egyptologist believes because they aren't even allowed to see the evidence. Hawass will not allow publication of the infrared study so their opinion is moot. Professional opinion is now based on old evidence. This is a simple fact and no spell or incantation can change this fact.

Egyptology has gone the way of the horse and buggy. Soon enough they will be a punchline for jokes.

 

[cladking]

Nah. 50 men. Cakewalk

I saw a video of some college professor who said the same thing. He got a bunch of healthy young graduate students out to show how easy it is. They couldn't even drag a little tiny stone up a ramp. Dr Lehner tried the same trick building a 1: 1000 scale model of G1 and failed so badly he had to have almost all the work done by machinery. They did manage to drag one stone up the ramp but it was a small one.

And you just ignored the fact that even if you were right that it would be easy with 50 men (you aren't) but this would mean you'd need well over 150 million men dragging stones and even twenty years isn't long enough to get so many men on the pyramid.

You are just imagining it mustta been easy because the pyramid is there and they mustta used ramps.

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

I can certainly understand and sympathize. Believers look at everyone who doesn't accept ramps as some sort of alien life form squirming in mud.

If you want to learn more about my beliefs as an Ancient Astronaut theorist, I suggest researching the lives and beliefs of these three men: Jacques Vallée, J. Allen Hynek, and Erich von Däniken. They are all influential pioneers in Ufology and have had a significant impact on the Ancient Astronaut theory.

 

[cladking]

If you want to learn more about my beliefs as an Ancient Astronaut theorist, I suggest researching the lives and beliefs of these three men: Jacques Vallée, J. Allen Hynek, and Erich von Däniken. They are all influential pioneers in Ufology and have had a significant impact on the Ancient Astronaut theory.

You've probably seen this;

The Tulli Papyrus

In the year 22, in the third month of winter, in the sixth hour of the day, the scribes of the House of Life noticed a circle of fire that was coming from the sky [...] From the mouth it emitted a foul breath. It had no head. Its body was one rod long and one rod wide.¹ It had no voice. And from that the hearts of the scribes became confused and they threw themselves down on their bellies [...] then they reported the thing to the Pharaoh [...] His Majesty ordered [...] has been examined [...] and he was meditating on what had happened, that it was recorded in the scrolls of the House of the Life. Now after some days had passed, these things became more and more numerous in the skies. Their splendor exceeded that of the sun and extended to the limits of the four angles of the sky [...] High and wide in the sky was the position from which these fire circles came and went. The army of the Pharaoh looked on with him in their midst. It was after supper. Then these fire circles ascended higher into the sky and they headed toward the south. Fish and birds then fell from the sky. A marvel never before known since the foundation of their land [...] And Pharaoh caused incense to be brought to make peace with Earth² [...] and what happened was ordered to be written in the Annals of the House of Life so that it be remembered for all time forward.

 

[Jimmy]

I saw a video of some college professor who said the same thing. He got a bunch of healthy young graduate students out to show how easy it is. They couldn't even drag a little tiny stone up a ramp. Dr Lehner tried the same trick building a 1: 1000 scale model of G1 and failed so badly he had to have almost all the work done by machinery. They did manage to drag one stone up the ramp but it was a small one.

And you just ignored the fact that even if you were right that it would be easy with 50 men (you aren't) but this would mean you'd need well over 150 million men dragging stones and even twenty years isn't long enough to get so many men on the pyramid.

You are just imagining it mustta been easy because the pyramid is there and they mustta used ramps.

Who knows maybe they used what you suggested earlier. I’m not really interested in it

 

[cladking]

Who knows maybe they used what you suggested earlier. I’m not really interested in it

All the evidence suggests linear funiculars were used. All this evidence survives in ruins and in the cultural context. Egyptology has sold us a bill of goods because it's easier than using science. They are afraid of the truth and afraid to upset the applecart still hitched before the horse. They are afraid of political repercussions. They are afraid of the effects on society and religion. They are terrified at the effect it could have on the meek.

They are afraid of the truth and their own shadow.

 

[Jimmy]

All the evidence suggests linear funiculars were used. All this evidence survives in ruins and in the cultural context. Egyptology has sold us a bill of goods because it's easier than using science. They are afraid of the truth and afraid to upset the applecart still hitched before the horse. They are afraid of political repercussions. They are afraid of the effects on society and religion. They are terrified at the effect it could have on the meek.

They are afraid of the truth and their own shadow.

Well, I don’t think anybody’s frightened

 

[cladking]

Well, I don’t think anybody’s frightened

Perhaps not but I can't understand why they haven't acknowledged my existence since 2010 when they referred to "other unscientific theories on the net" or ever even once acknowledged there is a theory of linear funiculars. Not even once! Instead they scoff at nonsensical things like magic and sharpening razor blades. They lump everything that isn't a ramp into the category of "crazy" and dismiss it out of hand. They insult, belittle and demean all such ideas even when they come from REAL scientists with REAL evidence.

 

[cladking]

Well, now that I have my very first piece of evidence this is all proven and I won't hear the word "ramp" any longer.

The Pyramid Funicular - T.A.Czarnota - Revision 7 - 2024

This hypothesis concerns the construction of The Great Pyramid of Giza. Primarily focusing on how the blocks of the Pyramid were raised up to the construction zone after arriving at its base. This hypothesis also seeks to provide an explanation for

www.academia.edu

This is a real relief. Who can argue with anything that is found on the net?

 

[cladking]

Well, now that I have my very first piece of evidence this is all proven and I won't hear the word "ramp" any longer.

The Pyramid Funicular - T.A.Czarnota - Revision 7 - 2024

This hypothesis concerns the construction of The Great Pyramid of Giza. Primarily focusing on how the blocks of the Pyramid were raised up to the construction zone after arriving at its base. This hypothesis also seeks to provide an explanation for

www.academia.edu

This is a real relief. Who can argue with anything that is found on the net?

And it's all scientificy with et als and everything. This proves it and Egyptology et al can pack their kits and kaboodle and go home.

I'm hardly surprised I'm not an et al. I've never believed in et als. Professors used to wonder why I had no et als but they aren't necessary when you base your work on facts and logic instead of professional opinions. I might never be an et al and I'd have been proud to know it.