TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Lets say that a prophet said that a purple polkadotted zebra was going to be born. Then it was born. That proves the prediction. Lets say that a series of correct predictions, that makes it even less likely of being a coincidence. You said that no test exists. Isn't the fact that a prediction (or many obscure and unlikely predictions) come true is an indication of the truthfulness of predictions.
Well, it's a bit complex actually. See, consider the statement: "the causal chain can't be just asserted - it needs to be demonstrated".
Suppose indeed that some "prophet" in some religious scriptures claims that some god talked to him and "revealed" these predictions to him. And let's say those predictions are as detailed as those in your example and that they indeed came out.
Does this "prove", or even "support" that a god exists and that this god revealed those predictions to him?
Nope. That was a bare anecdotal claim before confirming the predictions and it remains one after it.
At best, it warrants more investigation into the claims. But confirming the predictions does not confirm the anecdotal claim of how they were obtained.