How Does the Existence of God Negate Darwinian Evolution?

[Subduction Zone]

The Law of Monopoly refutes macroevolution.

What law is that ? I can't seem to find anything in my rule book:

 

[Subduction Zone]

Why would evolution which contradicts the law of monopoly have more explanatory power than God?

Someone is terribly confused

 

[Subduction Zone]

How do orangutans have more gender dimorphism than people? Being a chimp doesn't give them a greater ability to recognize gender. Species has nothing to do with gender recognition. Animals can tell people's gender. They know that people are different from them.

Seriously? You made claim without even looking into it?

 

[exchemist]

The Law of Monopoly refutes macroevolution.

Somebody had better tell all the hundreds of thousands of biologists about this law then, if they've got it all wrong.

Strangely, when I search the internet for this law I find nothing at all. Is it a newly discovered law, then? In what scientific paper can I read about it?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Slavery in the Bible didn't have an ethnic component.

So what?

 

[Skywalker]

The story of Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden is regarded as an allegory. Origen, one of the early Fathers of the Church, thought this back in 200AD. It is hardly a new idea. What is new is the silly notion that it is all to be taken literally. This idea grew up in the c.18th and 19th.

We do not know that the Earth is unique in having plants. We do not know whether there is, or was, life on other planets. We simply do not have the information. There are billions of stars like ours and very likely there are billions of planets like the Earth, too. But we can't see these planets as they are too far away and do not shine. It is quite likely that life has arisen on some of these, but we have no way of telling.

Scientists never found civilizations or plants on earth like planets that have been discovered.

 

[Skywalker]

This is rubbish. Where do you get this nonsense from? We have sequenced the DNA of a Neanderthal, from a preserved bone. We know, for sure, they were a genetically distinct form of human being. More here: Neanderthal genetics - Wikipedia

People with rickets have different genes and features.

 

[exchemist]

Scientists never found civilizations or plants on earth like planets that have been discovered.

This is hopeless. I have literally just explained to you why we have not found such things and why that proves nothing.

 

[Subduction Zone]

This is rubbish. Where do you get this nonsense from? We have sequenced the DNA of a Neanderthal, from a preserved bone. We know, for sure, they were a genetically distinct form of human being. More here: Neanderthal genetics - Wikipedia

We are talking old, I mean significantly old creationist claims. Of course there was a first Neanderthal man discovered. Creationists tried to claim that it was just an old man with arthritis and other such claims. Modern creationists dropped that because we have since found Neanderthals of all ages and both sexes and it simply does not hold up.

@Skywalker , could you please, please, please try to improve the quality of your arguments? At least check some more modern lying sources. And did you explore Biologos? That is a Christian site with articles by actual Christian scientists. It shows you that you do not have to deny reality to be a Christian.

 

[Subduction Zone]

People with rickets have different genes and features.

No, rickets does not change ones genome. Do you even know what rickets is or its cause?

 

[Skywalker]

No, rickets does not change ones genome. Do you even know what rickets is or its cause?

Rickets is related to a deficiency in vitamin D and it affects the bones.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Rickets is related to a deficiency in vitamin D and it affects the bones.

Very good. Thank you for refuting your earlier post.

 

[exchemist]

People with rickets have different genes and features.

You yourself said a short while ago that rickets was due to dietary deficiency, which is correct (lack of vitamin D).

Are you really so ignorant that you actually think dietary deficiency alters your genes?

Do you actually think, at all, before posting?

 

[Skywalker]

Seriously? You made claim without even looking into it?

That exists with orangutans because similar to peacocks, they have unique sexual dimorphism. They are an exception to the rule regarding animals. Look at birds. Male and female birds have different colors to attract mates but they don't have masculine and feminine faces.

 

[Skywalker]

You yourself said a short while ago that rickets was due to dietary deficiency, which is correct (lack of vitamin D).

Are you really so ignorant that you actually think dietary deficiency alters your genes?

Do you actually think, at all, before posting?

Dietary deficiencies have a genetic basis. It's similar to people with cancer having a genetic basis for that.

 

[exchemist]

No, rickets does not change ones genome. Do you even know what rickets is or its cause?

Is @Skywalker serious, do you think, or is he just trolling? Some of the self-contradictions and random rubbish are starting to seem like a wind-up.

 

[exchemist]

Dietary deficiencies have a genetic basis. It's similar to people with cancer having a genetic basis for that.

The clue is in the name: dietary deficiency.

 

[Skywalker]

So what?

People associate slavery with racism and the trans atlantic slave trade. The Old Testament slavery was not to that magnitude.

 

[Skywalker]

Because science is a very very wide field He was an engineer and worked with rather basic physics. He did not work in cosmology and he did not study evolution on a professional basis at all.

Physics and engineering relates to the fine tuning of the universe.

 

[Skywalker]

I am glad that you admit that he was not a valid authority.

How is a NASA scientist any less credible than another scientist?